Dont care if you dont belive me, because ill be posting my own video with proof. ALL of the games like CS:S COD 2 Matrix: PON BF2142 are now playable because of modded drivers:
CS:S (best played on vista): runs great on 640x480 and even 800x600 all maxed with 10 bots (more than 16 = lag)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82-RrmZ5wu4
COD 2 (AA was mistake) totally playable but FPS goes down to 10 at some points in dx9, for dx7 fps usually nvr goes below 20.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BHi_tDGQkw
F.E.A.R: windows 7 modded drivers have made the game playable with textures on high, but there may be a few second pauses at various parts runs great
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waaeqgShSS4
Killing Floor: runs great at medium-high settings but lags a bit when many zombies appear
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIHtDbRIgJQ
Team Fortress 2: runs best on vista runs good on min, able to put textures on high but will lag after 12 players
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-065sIWE5Q0&feature=related
BF 2142 and MatrixON vids coming up ^^
all of this is possible with modded drivers + addgame.reg, post for additional info!![]()
-
I see lag a few too many times in this post for it not to reek.
-
great effort. although it's better to just get a geforce 9200 or something.
-
There's a difference between a game which can run and a game which is playable, maybe for some the former is sufficient for a card to be rated better than junk.
-
But the thread title is a lie, lol. Try playing a modern game. -
well, reek or not, this is actually an improvement (whether small or big)
Any chance this mod going to work on 4500MHD? -
The GMA 950 smelled funny two years ago.
-
Cool, I'm Jealous!
Now I only wish I had a GMA 950! -
usapatriot Notebook Nobel Laureate
I have the X4500 which is far superior to the 950, and it still sucks!
-
So do I.
But it's really not all that bad... for integrated Intel graphics anyway... -
Nice
, maybe you should also try GMABooster, it will raise your Core Clock.
-
rofl guys yeah it does reek ^^ but yeah when i first got my laptop i knew NOTHING about computers, just bought one and had the gma 950 on it. of course get somthing like a 9400 or even lower to play games well. ^^
More Vids:
Half Life 2: maxed settings 800x600= runs BEST on vista
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJaXUh7IT3U
Crysis (LOL): from 5-30 fps (30 fps when you looking at a plain path and only lasts till 1 person comes)with some tweaking you can get a good 15-20 fps on it and 10-20fps when people start coming
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJaXUh7IT3U
Portal: RUNS BEST ON XP totally playable 40-50 fps on a resolution of 640x480 or 800x600 and even 1024x768 fps will go from 30-35 at that point.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHbKkZRKYCU&feature=related
World In ConflictO NOT PATCH or it will get worse with each patch. RUNS BEST ON WIN 7. good game great fps. believe it or not, i lose about 3 fps when i switched the resolution from 800x600 to 1920x1080 on my tv. Settings such as particle and terrian can be put on high, or textures on med. High will run but turn off other settings. Play around with the settings as some settings run better than others. Pixel quality must be on high for better preformance. FPS 15-30. laggy of course when a nuke goes off but will run better if you look at it far away.
NO VIDEO ill post one soon ^^.
World of Warcraft:Tried the game and it works well on settings on min. 20-50 fps. RUNS BEST ON VISTA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dvg_kRuc00&feature=related
(this guy is running on a aspire one, so preformance will increase on better processors+ram)
GTA:SA and GTA vice city:
GTA SA runs on all low 600x600 or even 1024x768 with 20-30 fps. GTA vice city ran at a very good frame rate 25-30+ on 1024x768 with all settings on high. (again running on aspire one so your preformance will be better)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dvg_kRuc00&feature=related
Call of Duty: Runs maxed 640x480 30+ fps 800x 600 25-40 fps. This is fps on action.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJrvbXb_sXo&feature=related
(still aspire one)
adding more games later on ^^ again remember guys this does not mean that you should but a gma 950. (DONT EVER) but that if you have one. Its 0.0000000000001% less of a piece of trash now. If you guys want to modded drivers and how to do the addgame.reg make a post ^^ -
sorry D: the modded drivers are from the GMA 965 (x3100) which is why when you mod your drivers and go to www.srtest.com your video card with be a GMA 965. or somthing else modded by somthing. the X4500 is the best GMA card i believe. So you cant really improve. But there are videos of ppl playing cod waw on an x3100 with 8-20 fps. Would it run better on an X4500MHD? also COD 4 will run silky smooth
-
@AOTGMA950
Which CPU have you got in your Notebook and what RAM(single/dual channel, speed, latency)? -
1.73 ghz core 2 duo T5300 (fairly old) HP PAVILION dv6335ca
Ram: 1GB
2048MB DDR2 System Memory (2 Dimm) (added another GB of ram)
not sure if it is single or dual channel. thats all it says on the website. -
Thanks for the info
-
Can it play crysis?
-
w/ tweaks about 5-30 fps as i believe there is a vid link i posted
-
What did you record with?
-
sorry i put the hl2 link twice here is the vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCthw6QuAm4&feature=related -
he used fraps
-
can I get CoD4 to play on my Dell Mini 9 netbook? and how?
EDIT- funny,google brought up this locked thread http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=372350 -
well you cant run cod 4 without swiftshader ( i hope you know what that is) which runs the game at 4-5fps (it does that for all games) however we need to find a workaround the cod 4 engine because it is not in a regular code. There are people right now that are making modded drivers to fix the problem. the game should be playable because a game that has the same specs (forgot the name) ran on min 25-30fps. If the modded driver is successful we should be able to run cod 4 at an fps of 20-30
-
-
probably thats what they say but it did surpise me when infernal (pixel shader 3 game) ran pretty well :/ maxed 640x480
-
intel needs to leave the gaphics chips to nvidia and ati. intel gma 950 sucked 3 years ago
-
true but what can we do haha xD intel needs monies.
-
-
-
The card still sucks for gaming it dont even have HW transform and lighting nor vertex shaders so tweaking it really is no use
-
in theory there are vertex shading units :/ thats why the 3100 (updated gma 950) has exactly the same preformance issues
-
The x3100 (mobile version) has hardware T&L, but not the 950 nor the 3100.
-
why did they make the 3100..
-
-
So I have a Macbook with GMA 950, with Windows 7. Could you please post where the modded drivers are?
-
sure http://groups.google.com/group/intel9x-gaming you can make an account if you want for help to install and such
-
-
-
@Beric1
Just click on Downloads on the right. -
-
They "work", but they don't WORK.
-
I wholeheartedly recommend an Intel GMA series graphics chip for anyone with a gaming addiction and want to quit.
-
-
-
exception on CS:S on a lot of bots or on COD 2 on dx9 and yes it is useless
-
-
this would maybe have been interesting 2 years ago...
-
-
As I said in my 1st post, there is lag tooo many times in that post for this to be somewhat appealing.
-
alright then someone close this thread
PROOF the gma 950 does NOT reek!
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by AOTGMA950, Sep 4, 2009.