The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Playing Games Installed vs Not Installed

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Valour549, Nov 11, 2014.

  1. Valour549

    Valour549 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    16
    If u play a game where u simply copy an entire folder over and launch the game from there, compared to properly installing the game on ur laptop, is there any difference at all in terms of launch speed or performance?

    In particular I'm talking about on an SSD. I feel like pasting a folder in an SSD and running from there won't be as fast as properly installing a program in ur SSD. Might be wrong though.

    Thanks in advance for any thoughts or expertise on this matter.
     
  2. fatboyslimerr

    fatboyslimerr Alienware M15x Fanatic

    Reputations:
    241
    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Sounds good but might there be registry conflicts?
     
  3. Redbeard

    Redbeard Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    154
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    41
  4. D2 Ultima

    D2 Ultima Livestreaming Master

    Reputations:
    4,335
    Messages:
    11,803
    Likes Received:
    9,751
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Most new games require actual installation. Some games don't; the launch speed doesn't change too much. Especially on a SSD; at worst it'd be like 1/4 second or something.
     
  5. Apollo13

    Apollo13 100% 16:10 Screens

    Reputations:
    1,432
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    81
    It depends on the game. If the game looks up files in the registry, it may well fail to run without a proper installation. If it runs everything locally, then there shouldn't be any speed difference, since it's just looking in its folder, anyway.
     
  6. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Most games rely on registry entries and also sometimes on tertiary programs installed/running (i.e Punkbuster, .Net, etc) that would come with the installation process. As far as performance, it wouldn't really matter. As noted, Starcraft 2 doesn't care, a lot of people run it off their USB thumb drives.
     
  7. saturnotaku

    saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,879
    Messages:
    8,926
    Likes Received:
    4,706
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Fixed that for you.

    If you're running a game from Steam, where you put the game doesn't make a difference since it's downloading all the files it needs. Where what you want to do wouldn't work so well is with games on physical media due to the aforementioned registry conflicts.
     
    D2 Ultima likes this.
  8. maxheap

    maxheap caparison horus :)

    Reputations:
    1,244
    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Steam games can be copy-pasted because Steam has its own registry entries after installation and the copy-pasted game communicates through Steam.
     
  9. James D

    James D Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,314
    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    231
    I alway do it... keep games on drive D and sometimes reinstall OS on drive C. Game will create registry entries when first launched.
    But my Documents folder is on drive E so I never delete it when install OS.

    The only game which didn't run was Halo so I keep extracted registerstrings for it.