The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Question about Laptop LCDs and gaming below native resolution

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by aebrowne84, Sep 22, 2007.

  1. aebrowne84

    aebrowne84 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    First and foremost the build that is sitting in my cart awaiting my CC that is burning a hole in my pocket as I type:

    Vostro 1500
    Windows XP Home
    T5470 1.6 Duo Core
    15.4" Widescreen (S)XGA(+) with TrueLife
    1GB 667mhz RAM
    120GB 5400RPM Hard Drive
    256MB GeForce 8600M GT with DDR2 Memory

    When I first configured the laptop I want I figured WXGA (1280x800) would be sufficient because I didn't expect my laptop to run games higher than that resolution at the settings I desire. Upon further review I had a concern regarding the instances (which may be numerous) in which I won't be able to run a game at my preferred settings due to FPS. If I were to, for example, have to run Oblivion or Bioshock at 960x600 I would not be in native resolution and enjoying the benefits that come with that.

    For example, I understand that if I had an LCD with native resolution of 1600x1200 I would run 800x600 with 4 pixels rendering as if 1. So if I had a native resolution of 1440x900, and were gaming at 960x600, pixels would have to be emulated by a ratio of 1.46:1 and 1.5:1 respectively, or 1.46/1.5 pixels for every 1 (negligible aspect ratio modification). For 1280x800 native running at 960x600 the emulation would be 1.33.


    So my question is, in the very likely event I am gaming below native resolution, would it greatly benefit me to have more pixels to render/emulate the desired resolution, and/or am I totally missing the point as to how all this works?
     
  2. odin243

    odin243 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    862
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    First of all, you won't have to play Bioshock or Oblivion below 1280x800 with that video card.

    However, on upcoming games, it's true that having a higher native resolution will increase the picture quality of a game played at 960x600.

    What you need to decide is if you want to be able to play games at native for a while (with a 1280x800 screen) or if you want to pretty much always play games at below native (with a 1680x1050 screen) but have the extra real estate for other tasks.
     
  3. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    So far, 1680x1050 screen on my Vostro 1500 has been great. Running games @ 1280x800 for the most part and running desktop @ 1680x1050 is flawless. Downscaling has zero issues that I can see. Still looks crisp and clean.
     
  4. oresteez

    oresteez Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    184
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    my post is the same as htwingnut...
    i game at all different resolutions and they all look beautiful...bioshock, quakewars, oblivion..