The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Radeon 7500 Vs Laptop GPU

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by WolfHunter, Aug 24, 2006.

  1. WolfHunter

    WolfHunter Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Right now i have a Radeon 7500 in my desktop, im curious to know if these laptop gpus are better than the one in my desktop, like the Intel accel 950 or radeon 200m? which one runs better, because im playing war 3 ft on my desktop and i think it runs fine in my opinion, but im looking for a laptop and curious if its gonna run worse or better? in my computer i got 1gig of ram, 100gb hd and my radeon 7500... thanks
     
  2. Dustin Sklavos

    Dustin Sklavos Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,892
    Messages:
    1,595
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    The GMA 950 will be worse, the Radeon X200M will be much better.

    But keep in mind the X200M is low man on the totem pole as far as notebook graphics are concerned; any one of the modern dedicated graphics parts will deliver substantially improved performance over that 7500.
     
  3. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,441
    Messages:
    58,200
    Likes Received:
    17,914
    Trophy Points:
    931
    The 7500 better than the 950? Since the 7500 cant do DX9 I think the 950 is better.
     
  4. Paul

    Paul Mom! Hot Pockets! NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    759
    Messages:
    2,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I'm going to agree with Meaker. I have the Mobility 7500 in my old Latitude C640, and it's weak. With 32MB of vRAM, it's hard trying to find anything to even install since most these days require at least 64MB. Also keep in mind that Vista's Aero will run on GMA 950 but not on the 7500. And as Meaker said, the 7500 is not DX9; GMA 950 is. Although I will say that my MR7500 overclocked rocked the **** out of Call of Duty and Halo before I saw them on my M90.
     
  5. Chele

    Chele Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yeah I agree to, I hink that both will be better than a 7500.
     
  6. jujube

    jujube Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    181
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Since I had the 7500 myself I'm adding another vote to:

    7500<950< X200m
     
  7. Dustin Sklavos

    Dustin Sklavos Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,892
    Messages:
    1,595
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Feel free to disagree; I've found the GMA to offer VERY inconsistent performance. Some of you are comparing the Mobility Radeon 7500 to the GMA950 and there IS a difference.

    A desktop 7500 will likely have 64MB of dedicated video memory. More than that, it has hardware texture and lighting, a basic feature that the GMA950 still doesn't have and must do in software. Just being DX9 doesn't make it better. The GeForce FX 5200 was a DX9 card, too, you know.

    I can get UT2K4 to run playably and smoothly, albeit at low settings, on a 7500. I cannot say the same for the GMA950, which I found to be choppy at any level of settings.
     
  8. HavoK

    HavoK Registered User

    Reputations:
    706
    Messages:
    1,719
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The GMA is absolutely bizarre at some games, its not just a case of being simply choppy in UT 2K4, it just keeps jumping from 10fps to 40fps, and back down again - even if you're only doing something like walking in an empty room! It's really strange, and even on ultra low settings its the same as mid-high settings....
     
  9. Thaenatos

    Thaenatos Zero Cool

    Reputations:
    1,581
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    231
    ati 200m > Intel gma950. The 200m is significantly faster then the Intel counter part. But niether are for gaming.
     
  10. Lost187

    Lost187 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    i have a 200m and if your just looking to play warcraft 3 it runs great on high settings but i can also play DoW40K at high settings with no slow down and c&C generals at high no slow downs. For RTS's it's okbut i don't think it will be able to play the newer ones like Company of Heroes but i did get the JTF Demo to run smoothly at Medium settings on my 200m
     
  11. KGann

    KGann NBR Themesong Writer

    Reputations:
    317
    Messages:
    2,742
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I use a 7500 Mobility in my Laptop... yes, out of date, I know... but I have had my laptop upgraded a substancial amount, aside from the GPU. I can play BF1942, BF Vietnam, UT2K4, Baulders Gate II, and others with grate FPS at 800x600, medium. Not too bad for a 7500 Mobility!