Hi, i have HWMonitor and RMClock. HWMonitor says my DV5 has an idle temp of around 38C while RMClock says i have around 23C. which one should i trust?
-
-
Are you reading the correct sensor in RMClock? HW Monitor's temperature is more reasonable, so I would go with that.
-
HWmonitor is better , i really dont think its 20 c where you keep your laptop as well
...38c sound right and usually HWmonitor is the best to get... as far as accurate readings
-
I prefer HWmonitor
-
you can actually trust both.*
programs detect the temp sensors of the CPU... from each core
each core will have different temps.... ranging up to 10 C degree differences at times.
RMclock will show CPU0 temp, CPU1 temp, etc... in separate charts (buttons on bottom of the monitoring section)
if you set RMclock to have a tray icon for CPU temp, it will take the average temp of all cores and display that value in the tray.
HWmonitor is very basic.. showing the temps from each core.
I would rather just have the average temp.
*there is another reason why there might be a discrepancy because RMclock has not been update for a while now and might not fully support the CPU you have if it did not exist during the time of release. -
Try using Everest. You can set it to start with windows in the task tray, shows all temps very nicely. Also shows CPU temp, not the core temp which is always lower than CPU temp. This is the temp that your fan monitors.
-
pcwizard2008
-
HW Monitor runs in sinc with my gpu control centre temparatures, so thats accurate enoguh for me.
-
HWMonitor is correct.
RMclock doesnt have the Tjunction max specs for newer CPU's thats why there is an offset. It is over a year old since last updated!
To fix it you just need to edit the RMclock registry and tweak the offset. -
HwMonitor. Its always been the most accurate for me. RmClock is just good for CPU settings.
Should i go with HWMonitor or RMClock?
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by zijin_cheng, Mar 25, 2009.