The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Should i go with HWMonitor or RMClock?

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by zijin_cheng, Mar 25, 2009.

  1. zijin_cheng

    zijin_cheng Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    16
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Hi, i have HWMonitor and RMClock. HWMonitor says my DV5 has an idle temp of around 38C while RMClock says i have around 23C. which one should i trust?
     
  2. MidnightSun

    MidnightSun Emodicon

    Reputations:
    6,668
    Messages:
    8,224
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Are you reading the correct sensor in RMClock? HW Monitor's temperature is more reasonable, so I would go with that.
     
  3. The_Moo™

    The_Moo™ Here we go again.....

    Reputations:
    3,973
    Messages:
    13,930
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    HWmonitor is better , i really dont think its 20 c where you keep your laptop as well :D ...38c sound right and usually HWmonitor is the best to get... as far as accurate readings
     
  4. FoxTrot1337

    FoxTrot1337 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    352
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I prefer HWmonitor
     
  5. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
    you can actually trust both.*

    programs detect the temp sensors of the CPU... from each core

    each core will have different temps.... ranging up to 10 C degree differences at times.

    RMclock will show CPU0 temp, CPU1 temp, etc... in separate charts (buttons on bottom of the monitoring section)

    if you set RMclock to have a tray icon for CPU temp, it will take the average temp of all cores and display that value in the tray.

    HWmonitor is very basic.. showing the temps from each core.

    I would rather just have the average temp.

    *there is another reason why there might be a discrepancy because RMclock has not been update for a while now and might not fully support the CPU you have if it did not exist during the time of release.
     
  6. grbac

    grbac Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    137
    Messages:
    982
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Try using Everest. You can set it to start with windows in the task tray, shows all temps very nicely. Also shows CPU temp, not the core temp which is always lower than CPU temp. This is the temp that your fan monitors.
     
  7. nomoredell

    nomoredell Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    49
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    pcwizard2008
     
  8. catacylsm

    catacylsm Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    423
    Messages:
    4,135
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    HW Monitor runs in sinc with my gpu control centre temparatures, so thats accurate enoguh for me.
     
  9. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    HWMonitor is correct.

    RMclock doesnt have the Tjunction max specs for newer CPU's thats why there is an offset. It is over a year old since last updated!

    To fix it you just need to edit the RMclock registry and tweak the offset.
     
  10. MonkeyMhz

    MonkeyMhz Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    68
    Messages:
    303
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    HwMonitor. Its always been the most accurate for me. RmClock is just good for CPU settings.