I searched and came up empty. Trying to launch SWBF beta and it requires Nvidia driver 355.60?
I´m on 347.88. Really?
-
-
I thought the so called optimized driver for SWBF3 was 358.50. That's the one I'm using
-
Tinderbox (UK) BAKED BEAN KING
I just ran the beta, apart from virtually all the missions being disabled, why it needs 9gb download i dont know, maybe all the missions are there, they are just disabled so you just get an taste for the game.
But i enjoyed the 1 mission tatooine, and it ran fine on my Intel i3-4010U using it`s integrated gpu and i used the default settings, dying to have another go and cannot wait for the full game.
John -
9GB is nothing these days. BF4 with expansions is like 57GB.
TomJGX and i_pk_pjers_i like this. -
Most of the others.... well.... -
Tinderbox (UK) BAKED BEAN KING
Yikes 57GB, I was happy with the games on my old Amiga computer in the 80`s and they managed to fit an exciting game on an 720k floppy disk, No FPS games those day`s though as far as i can remember, I remmber have an space game called Epic on my Amiga "20mb" Hdd
The Battlefront combat was quit hairy, being attacked by an scout-walker and 20 stormtroopers is fun, and i like the gun section, The great big heavy gun is fun, it has low damage but fires really fast and cools down quick, In the heat of battle I keep moving, it`s a lot harder to shoot a moving target.
John.
-
I'd rather play Destiny. And that says a lot considering my dislike of that game... Yet that is what I did today. The ten people who I was playing with in various teams all said they played the beta and removed it. This game is going to flop.
-
I definitely won't be aiming to get it. -
-
-
-
-
I've enjoyed it so far, and this is only the beta. I realize the game is to be released very soon next month, but I don't see any huge game breaking issues. Performance is great and it looks great IMO. I looked at a YouTube video of Battlefront 2 uploaded this year and I don't see what the craze was about that game versus what I'm seeing here. Obviously there is going to be more maps, and there is definitely a forest map, you can see it in the beta game modes not released yet. In all honesty I've also had zero trouble with the match making service they are running. Getting into a game takes less than 15 seconds typically. Load times seem much faster than BF4, and I have this beta running on my 7200 spinny drive versus the SSD that BF4 is installed to. Unless I see something different or change my mind over the next couple days when the beta is scheduled to end, I will be preordering.
-
I won't pre-order, well only if they offer some great incentives, like free DLC.
-
.
-
Not preordering as well.
However, this is probably the first DICE beta that didn't constantly crash on me every couple of hours. -
But this game has crashed three times; once with a DirectX Error that froze my PC shortly afterward. My system was stock, so I know it wasn't my system's fault. BF4 has also crashed my GPU drivers at stock in the past without being used at max util and it's glitched out my system until I had restarted.
It's why I hate playing BF4 very often. nVidia drivers being cancer or not, the fact of the matter is that if I'm not playing BF4 (or apparently Battlefront) then I don't crash at stock. Folding@home on CPU and both GPUs at 100%? easy pickings. GTA V at max graphics with overclocks? ONE single crash in about 3-4 full days of doing it. Every other game I own at stock? crash-free. BF4/SWBF? problems. I won't blame nVidia for DICE's screwups here. -
killkenny1 Too weird to live, too rare to die.
It's just the matter of time before you click that checkout button...
Star Wars Battlefront requires 355.60
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Mr Najsman, Oct 9, 2015.