****The Official 3DMark Comparison List!!! Post you scores here!***

I thought this would be a cool thread to have, so basically just name you graphics cards and other specs (or just graphics card), resolution tested at (or other settings you changed if you think they mattered) and your score.... try to put your graphics card number ( GeForce 8600, Radeon 4800, etc), resolution tested at and your score in bold for easier viewing!
POST BOTH 3DMARK 06 AND VANTAGE IF YOU WANT!!!
Please post type of memory and how much! Ex: 1.7GB GDDR3

I'll start

Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Score in 3DMark 06: 5012
Resolution: 1366x768

See other specs in sig

CURRENT RECORD HOLDER FOR 3DMARK 06 IS!!! Aeris with his SLi Geforce 8800m GTX 14108!!!

CURRENT RECORD HOLDER FOR 3DMARK VANTAGE IS!!! [/B Kevin Jack2.0 with his GeForce 9800m GT scoring 11259
Comparison for 3DMark 06! (Lowest to highest)
GeForce 9300m GT 256mb - 1901 - AppleUser
GeForce 9200m GS GDDR3 - 2787 - Manic Penguins
GeForce 8600M GT 256MB - 4226 - Signal2Noise
GeForce 9600m GS - 4500 (1280x1024) -ARom
GeForce 9600m GS DDR2 OC'd - 4500 (1280x1024) - FragZero
Mobility Radeon HD 3670 512MB GDDR3 - 5012 (1366x768) - Hoodoomoo
GeForce 8600m GT GDDR3 - 5258 - cathy
GeForce 9600m GT 256MB - 5615 - namakiki
GeForce 9700m GT - 5700 (1280x1024) - plasma
Geforce 8800m GTS - 7101 - xxEricxx
Sli GeForce 8600m GT - 7743 - JosePerez
GeForce 9700m OC'd - 8738 - Dude55
GeForce 9800m GTS (1280x1024) - 8750 - Red Dragon
GeForce 9800m GTS 1GB OC'd - 9499 - SemiGamer
GeForce 8800m GTS 512MB - 9600 - narsnail
GeForce 9800m GT 512mb - 9701 - NapalmSilyPuddy
GeForce 9800m GS DDR2 - 9902 - Reaper05
GeForce 9800m GS 512MB GDDR3 - 9973 - CA36GTP
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 OC - 10147 - Redlance
SLi GeForce 8800m GTX OC'd - 11080 (1280x1024) - Mangus72
Crossfire Mobility Radeon HD 3870- 12600 MR.Moo
SLi GeForce 8800m GTX - 13071 - dtwn
SLi Geforce 8800m GTX - 14108 (1280x1024) - Aeris

Comparison for 3DMark Vantage!
SLi Geforce 8800m GTX - 10535 - Aeris
GeForce 9800m GT - 11259 - Kevin_Jack2.0

 

GeForce 9600m GT 256MB

Score in 3DMark 06: 5,615 @ 1280x800? (need to check, but I only have the freeware version and my screen's native resolution is 1280x800)

Processor: P8600
RAM: 2GB @ 667MHz

 

Nvidia 9800m gs@590-1490-815

3d mark 06(9902) FTW
default res 1024x768

 

specs in sig

8738 3dmark 06

regular default res

 

Dual 8600m GT Stock Clocks (475/950/702)

3dMark06 Score = 7011 at 1440x900

3dmark06 Score = 7743 at 1280x800

T7250 2.0 Ghz 2MB Processor
2 GB Ram 667 Mhz

 

X7800 @ 2.8 Ghz
8800m GTS

9600 Points

 

What drivers are you using?

 

Modified 9.1 Drivers, when i used 8.5 i got around 4800, what do you get?

 

Everyone should also post the resolution that they did the test in.

 

Nvidia 9600M GS, P8400, 4GB RAM

Score in 3DMark 06: 4500

(1280*1024)

 

nVidia 9800M GTS 1GB Vram (715/960/1750)
P8400 2.2ghz
4GB RAM
Dox 182.11 Drivers.

3Dmark06: 9499
Res the test was in: 1280x1024.

 

3Dmark06: 1901

default all

 

T8300 2.4GHz
8600M GT GDDR3 (600/1200/900)
169.04 drivers

3DMark06: 5258 @ 1280x1024

 

agreed, i'll put that in the original post

 

t9400 2.5ghz
ddr3 1066mhz

12,600 default res

i got the highest so far

 

P8400 + 9800GTS @ 1280 x 1024 W/Nvidia Drivers = 8750

 

3DMark 06 Score: 9701
GPU, CPU, etc in sig

 

Screenshots?

 

yes screenshots are VERY welcome, provide PROOF of course

 

Here is a wide range of 3D Mark 06 scores at different resolutions. T7700 2.4GHz, 8800m GTX SLI overclocked to 612/1512/950

3D Mark 06 1280x1024 11080

3D Mark 06 1280x1024 4xAA 16xAF 10627

3D Mark 06 1440x900 10915

3D Mark 06 1440x900 4xAA 16xAF 10358

3D Mark 06 1920x1200 10418

3D Mark 06 1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF 9638

 

Acer Aspire 8930G

3DMark06 (1280 by 1024): 5700

T9400, 4GB DDR3, 9700m gt, 320GB 5400rpm

 

Sager NP9262: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.67 GHz + x2 Nvidia GeForce 8800m GTX's @ Stock on SLi (Dox's 185.20 - Quality modded ForceWare Drivers).

GPU-Z Screenshot:



3DMark 2006 @ Default:



3DMark Vantage @ Default + PhysX (Focus on GPU Score, CPU Score W/O PhysX is around 10,800):



Edit: Shrunk the pictures to 75% their size, now anybody with a resolution above 800x600 should be able to see them with no problems.

 

Hi What prog are you using to determine graphics card scores? Thanks Peter

 

P8400 Core 2 Duo @ 2.64GHz
9800M GS 512MB GDDR3 @ 600/1500/828
DOX 182.05 Drivers

3dMark06 @ 1366x768: 9,574
3dMark06 @ 1280x720: 9,973

 

GT725-074US
P8600 @ 2.4Ghz (turbo mode to 2.8)
Radeon 4850HD 500/800 OC 550 / 900

3dmark 10147
default res

 

Aeris, can you thumbnail those images!

Spec and score in my sig (run at 1280x800)

 

P7350 2GHZ
4GB
9600M GS DDR2 OC 575/1400/450

3Dmark 2006
1366x768 4300 OC 5200 (Native resolution)
1280x1024 3800 OC 4500

max OC 690/1600/510
1366x768 5550

 

Im using catalyst 9.2 and getting 4388 give me a link to your drivers please

 

Hood if you have time you should update the first post with peoples scores

 

Yes i am planning on doing that, i'm a little busy right this minute but i will try to later

 

Q9450 8800m GTX SLI stock, running Nvidia's mobile drivers

1280 x 1024
13071.

I usually run my tests in loop of 3.

 

i just updated it

 

Could you post a 3DMark Vantage comparative as well?, even though 3DMark 2006 is still relevant, but it is now becoming old and does not compare newer systems quite well (3DMark 2006's first two tests are based on Shader Model 2.0...), and with the newer Nvidia Drivers, it seems like that the 3DMark 2006 performance goes down, but the 3DMark Vantage is more optimized and constant.

By the way, Super OC'd Scores (650 MHz Core, 1,650 MHz Shader and 1,050 MHz Memory):

3DMark 2006:



3DMark Vantage:



Edit: Added OC'd Scores.

 

Yes, i'll create a second section in the main post comparing 3DMark Vantage and so that way to can compare computer to computer and compare it to the old 3DMark 06, i'll do that later...

 

See sig.

It's lame, I know.

With laptops I don't experiment that much and I certainly don't bother overclocking the gpu/cpu. I value longevity over pure performance. So my 3DMark06 score will vary solely based on driver versions.

 

Edit: Added OC'd scores to my post above.

Alright, thank you.

That is not a lame score, it is a good score actually.

Heh, I cannot overclock my CPU since the Clevo D901C has its overclocking features (SetFSB, Clockgen, etc... do not work) locked, not like that it would make a very big difference. Me too, I only overclock when I really need it (such as when benchmarking), and my cards are working as if new still.

 

That's quite a nice boost on your cards, Aeris.

 

Thanks, that is quite the max. overclock that I have been able to reach without starting to lose performance. (Without artifacting or block-outs either)

 

I'm not surprised.

30% or more on clocks is impressive.

 

Hehe, yeah, I stayed up for a whole night fine-tuning the clocks so that they could co-exist.

 

updated with new 3DMark Vantage section

 

Thanks. By the way, Kevin Jack's "11000" score was for 3DMark 2006, not Vantage, look at the "Maximum System" score at the left, and compare it to 3DMark 2006's, it is the very same.

Also, there are "SM2.0" and "SM3.0 / HDR" scores in his ORB graph too, which Vantage does not have, only 3DMark 2006.

 

t5550 1.8ghz, 4gb ram, 8800m gts at stock clocks. 3dmark 06=7101

 

Don't forget the resolution.

 

New low score, but my highest (3dmark06) specs in sig, dox 180.84.1 driver

1875

 

New scores with tweaked drivers:

3dMark06 @ 1366x768: 9,662
3dMark06 @ 1280x720: 10,037

 

This is true. The P4776 is my Vantage score.

Once I get my GTX 260M, I expect at least 12k in 06, but not sure how much of a boost I'll get in Vantage.

 

For what it's worth here you go all stock and no OC on anything
14844
not to shabby!

 

5653, 1280 x 1024, very stable OC

512mb 9600 gt ddr2...

 

Video card: 8600M GT DDR2
Processor: T7500 (2.2 GHz)
Drivers: 181.20 Dox optimized
OS: XP SP3
Resolution: 1280x800
Clocks: 596/400 (core/memory) [stock 475/400]
Score: 4212

Props for keeping the list updated - that's the problem with the other attempts at that here, is that they're never updated. May I one suggestion:

*Seperate by resolution as well as by 3dmark version (06/08). That makes for a huge difference in results. Also require resolution to be stated on all submissions. I'd take out any results that don't have a resolution as that's really necessary to know how performance compares to other machines.

Because really, a 1280x800 score compared to a 1280x1024 score makes the card running at 1280x800 look much better than it is. Making the reader sort through the list here half defeats the purpose of it in the first point. Certainly 1280x800 (1366x768, 1400x900, etc.) scores should be accepted - this is a laptop site, after all, but there should be seperate lists for each resolution. And that's half the trouble with the lists on other sites - they only accept 1280x1024 so for most of us laptop users with fewer than 1024 vertical pixels, the comparisons are kind of meaningless.