The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    VRAM in Applications

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Phase, Mar 17, 2015.

  1. n=1

    n=1 YEAH SCIENCE!

    Reputations:
    2,544
    Messages:
    4,346
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    Trophy Points:
    231
    At least both companies were consistent in having the SE and LE suffixes denote gimped versions. I think the joke used to be LE meant Light Edition?

    But it's funny how 6800 GT > 6800 GTO, but 7900 GTO > 7900 GT. Goddamn was it confusing back in the old days.
     
    TomJGX and Ethrem like this.
  2. octiceps

    octiceps Nimrod

    Reputations:
    3,147
    Messages:
    9,944
    Likes Received:
    4,194
    Trophy Points:
    431
    LE = Lame Edition
     
    TomJGX and n=1 like this.
  3. n=1

    n=1 YEAH SCIENCE!

    Reputations:
    2,544
    Messages:
    4,346
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    Trophy Points:
    231
    SE must be Sucky Edition then
     
    TomJGX and octiceps like this.
  4. octiceps

    octiceps Nimrod

    Reputations:
    3,147
    Messages:
    9,944
    Likes Received:
    4,194
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Exactly ^_^

    On a serious note though, the reason naming schemes were such a minefield was because of how cutthroat the GPU wars between Nvidia and AMD were. As hard as it is to believe nowadays, they had nearly equal market share back then. The extreme segmentation (there was basically another card every $5-10 up and down Nvidia and AMD's lineups) was a result of that.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2015
  5. n=1

    n=1 YEAH SCIENCE!

    Reputations:
    2,544
    Messages:
    4,346
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Was going to say the same about the segmentation, you had almost every possible variation under the sun. Didn't see it as a bad thing though, because it meant more choices and less compromises.
     
  6. octiceps

    octiceps Nimrod

    Reputations:
    3,147
    Messages:
    9,944
    Likes Received:
    4,194
    Trophy Points:
    431
    To be fair though, the abundance of choices didn't mean they made a ton of different GPUs.

    For example, the only differences between 7900 GT, GTO, GTX, and 7950 GT were clock speeds and VRAM amount. Otherwise they were the exact same fully enabled G71 chip.
     
    TomJGX likes this.
  7. n=1

    n=1 YEAH SCIENCE!

    Reputations:
    2,544
    Messages:
    4,346
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    Trophy Points:
    231
    I know, just saying if people wanted to pay a bit more for guaranteed clockspeeds as well as more vram, they had the choice, and the choices were abundant.

    I mean we still have some choices these days, but not nearly as abundant, and certainly can't say the same for vram. Though the lineups are less fragmented and confusing that's true.
     
    TomJGX likes this.
← Previous page