Please post your specs and ONLY valid scores of the 3Dmark benchmark you like or all as. Please DO NOT post unvalid scores are totally incorrect and useless.
Ati 5850M GDDR3 Overclocked
Intel i7 QM740
8GB 1333 ram
-------------------------
3DMark 11:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6548409 (NR 9 in the world with same GPU)
Firestrike:
http://www.3dmark.com/cg/423450 (NR 1 in the world with same GPU)
Cloud Gate:
http://www.3dmark.com/is/474483 (NR 1 in the world with same GPU)
Icestorm:
http://www.3dmark.com/is/474483 (NR 5 in the world with same GPU)
Vantage:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/4690301 (NR 10 in the world with same GPU)
-
beaten to it
was mainly for clevo laptops but you can compare in the links below. -
-
thats got to be seriously overclocked to get the highest score in the world on firestrike.
nice to see its a XMG laptop though -
i remember there is one member his 7970m can oc to 1100/1560 stock voltage. hope he can run fire strike to show us
-
haha its the fastet 5850M ever to be recored on firestrike not the fastet of all GPUs
-
Sager NP9150
i7-3740QM @ 3.9GHz
GTX 680m @ 1000/2400 (stock voltage)
Drivers 314.22
3DMark Vantage
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3740QM Processor,CLEVO P1x0EM score: P28189 3DMarks (P28189)
3DMark 11 P
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3740QM Processor,CLEVO P1x0EM score: P7901 3DMarks (P7901)
3DMark 11 X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3740QM Processor,CLEVO P1x0EM score: X2730 3DMarks (X2730)
IceStorm
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3740QM Processor,CLEVO P1x0EM (103184)
Cloud Gate
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3740QM Processor,CLEVO P1x0EM (20080)
Fire Strike
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3740QM Processor,CLEVO P1x0EM (5111)
By the way, invalid scores are not totally incorrect and useless. It just means Futuemark hasn't gotten off their lazy butts and confirmed the drivers. Beta drivers show up as "invalid". Even WHQL drivers show up as invalid sometimes. -
Sager NP6110
i7-3610QM @ 3.1GHz
GT 650m @ 1260 GPU / 1175 DDR3 vRAM
Drivers 314.22
3DMark Vantage
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO CO. W110ER score: P12171 3DMarks (P12171)
3DMark 11
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO CO. W110ER score: P3135 3DMarks (P3135)
Ice Storm
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO CO. W110ER (87723)
Cloud Gate
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO CO. W110ER (10618)
Fire Strike
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO CO. W110ER (1903) -
Many times unvalid drivers dont render the tests as they should. Like i used the 13.1 drivers on firestrike and got a very high score because the drivers did not render everything corretly according to a developer at 3DMark so that why 13.1 and many other drivers are not aprooved. Sure some drivers render all corretly and are not aprooved because they are too new. It takes them about a week of testing before they aproove new drivers. If its not aprooved by than it means it does not render the tests properly. You can look on 3dmark results yourself and search up different GPU's and you will see more crazy unvalid results like a 4870 beating a 680GTX on gpu score etc just because the drivers does not render the test corretly.
by the way thats great results on the 650m -
I've had WHQL drivers on numerous occasions show invalid results, and beta drivers show valid results when it resulted in crazy high numbers too. Their approval process is spotty at best is all I was trying to say. Sometimes people need to run beta drivers to make everything else run better, or run at all, but not approved by 3DMark, so I doubt people will care to change drivers just for a benchmark vs actual playing games. So while I think it's fair to request VALID results, it's not fair to say ones listed as INVALID are totally incorrect and useless.
-
I think unvalid drivers are useless because there are to much bull results when you look at unvalid result and to many ppl using drivers that get u crazy scores and than brag about it etc. Lazy to write more about it but seeing the forum is pretty much dead i dont rly care anymore anyways
-
Pretty much dead?
-
-
What are your VALID 3DMark scores?
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Bob, May 10, 2013.