The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    What setting is more intensive?

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by llmercll, Nov 19, 2009.

  1. llmercll

    llmercll Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    15
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    1650x1080 0xAA

    or

    1366x768 2xAA



    just wondering if AA is more demanding that a higher resolution, and which would most likely result in better fps.

    thanks!
     
  2. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    It depends on your card and the game. If you have an ATI card, there are 3 types of AA and if the card is a DX10.1 or 11 one, 4xMSAA is free (but MSAA sucks)

    I think the perfs wil lbe similar
     
  3. surfasb

    surfasb Titles Shmm-itles

    Reputations:
    2,637
    Messages:
    6,370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    It really depends on your card and the game. You'll be surprised how different two games respond to the same settings.
     
  4. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    in general i think 1366x768 with 2x aa will be less intensive, because many modern cards get 2-4x aa basically for free.
     
  5. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    4xMSAA is mandatory and free with DX10.1. So DX10.1 and 11 cards have it. I still prefer 2xSSAA over 24xMSAA on my Radeon 5770 so....lol
     
  6. Amnesiac

    Amnesiac 404

    Reputations:
    1,312
    Messages:
    3,433
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Better to play at native resolution. No scaling results in better quality.
     
  7. ViciousXUSMC

    ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    11,461
    Messages:
    16,824
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Depends on the game, your video card, what type of AA, and your drivers as to witch is more intensive.

    It would be easier to test and monitor your FPS with FRAPS than it would be for anybody to answer that question.
     
  8. richard smith

    richard smith Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    yeah its right,
    all depends on your card,the game and the type of AA you have.
     
  9. jenesuispasbavard

    jenesuispasbavard Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    51
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Crysis, for example, takes a pretty big performance hit with 4xAA, so I run it at 1680x1050 0xAA instead of 1440x900 4xAA (or even 2xAA).
     
  10. Mastershroom

    Mastershroom wat

    Reputations:
    3,833
    Messages:
    8,209
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Out of curiosity, what cards get this "free" 4x MSAA, and how does that differ from other types of AA?
     
  11. llmercll

    llmercll Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    15
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    If I understood correctly, most new cards can offer 4xAA without taking much a performance hit. I tested this actually and found it true, at least for dragon age, but i hear that's a more cpu intensive game, so i don't know any more than that =p

    It did however slightly raise my temps, but only a C or so.