Hi,
So I'm looking for to get a laptop soon, but it's not really for gaming. However, I do wish to play 2 games and depending on what I need for these 2 games I will be getting a laptop that will be able to play them.
So my question is, in order to play Left 4 Dead 2 and Starcraft 2 on a smooth fps with medium settings (nothing max), what is the cheapest video card that will accomplish in what I'm looking for?
Thanks!
-
Geforce GT230/240
-
HD4570
10 characters. -
honestly i think startcraft 2 is going to be more cpu dependent then graphics. the units are so small I dont think super graphics card are gonna matter. I could be dreadfully wrong of course. its not out yet to really know. i would think any graphics card that could score at least 4-6k in 3dmark 06 would be fine. but its just a guess.
-
I think it would be safe to say that a PC that will run Left 4 Dead 2 will run Starcraft 2. So I think minimum HD 4570 and GT 130m/230m/240m are spot on. CPU probably at least a 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo for a good experience.
-
When I purchased a laptop to play only 2 games, I really ended up wanting to play 60.
-
Damn straight. I only wanted a laptop that could play Crysis on low. Now I want a Clevo W870CU. If you have the money, just get a gaming laptop.
-
"Only 2 games" doesn't make a difference. I could want a computer to "only play one game", but if that game is Crysis, I won't make a difference whether I'm playing just Crysis or Crysis and 100 other games.
-
Thanks for the input guys. I'll look into those cards.
I really dont have time to play many games, (i actually HAD a top of the line gaming computer but sold it before the value drops because i rarely had time to play with it). But i figure if for some reason I do decide to play more games I can always run games equal or less demanding than left for dead 2.
Any more input is always appreciated. -
insanechinaman Notebook Evangelist
Blizzard typically make games with low requirements so that everyone can enjoy them. I seriously doubt SC2 will change this.
Left for Dead 2 isn't very demanding either. A 9600M GT will probably run both of these games on medium, maybe some settings on high. -
Same as you few.. I had a Macbook and used Crossover games to play some steam games..HL2, TF2..then wanted to play L4D, so installed Bootcamp.. then from there I got crysis, and my steam collection started growing..and then I sold my Macbook for something more powerful for games yet useful for video and other things.. now I want a pure gaming laptop from here but don't want to give up my screen and other niceness of the SXPS.. so yeah get something with futureproofing video card.. 260m or a 4670 would be good.
-
Playing L4D2 smoothly at 720p on G105m and CULV here. I think both games can do with minimal graphics but would benefit more from good CPU (I hear that Source is CPU intensive engine and Starcraft as a RTS game would probably be more CPU based too).
Blizzard tend to be fairly good with making polished low-spec games and Source engine isn't too demanding. So for casual gaming on Medium I'd recommend a reasonable C2D + anything on par with or more powerful than G105m - i.e. 4570 + c2d.
From my experience (pretty low specs - su7300 / g105m) Source games aren't that demanding, if you want to be prepared for any other non-source based FPS' then you might want something more powerful (it's really at it's limit playing Dragon Age Origins at 1024x768 smoothly).
Remember, if you're buying a laptop and intend to use it for ~2-3 years, then there's a very good chance you'll be interested in something more demanding (spec-wise) than L4D2 / SC2 (even though Diablo 3 should be easy to accomodate too) -
stevenxowens792 Notebook Virtuoso
These posts should really be combined. I think we had one almost just like this last week. It was something like.. "What notebook should I buy to play XXXXX?". Same answer as before. Almost all dedicated vid cards will play new games. Just depends on what rez and features you want enabled.
Create a budget, buy the most you can with that budget.
Rinse-Lather-Rinse-Dry-repeat...
Happy Holidays,
StevenX -
I have a 9600m gt ddr2 and It runs l4d2 maxed settings (no anti-ailaising though, but it does have a bit o antstropy*) at 1280x 800 easy 40fps avg (Aus version is 60fps easy Lol, no gore makes jack a dull game).
as for SC2 the Asus notebooks that were used to demo it at bllizzcons and several expo's had a 9800m gt in them, though this was for quite a high resolution with max settings, anti-alising and vsync at 60 fps. a 4570 should be minimum however I believe that the 9500m gs should be minimum for both those games to be played happily at medium settings.
*however it is spelt -
You shouldn't ever buy the minimum. What's your budget?
-
this.......................
Whats the minimalest video card I should look for if I only want to play 2 games?
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Kyin01, Nov 23, 2009.