The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Why does catalyst drivers suck at gaming so much.

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by wolfraider, Sep 2, 2007.

  1. wolfraider

    wolfraider Grand Viezir of Chaos

    Reputations:
    193
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    sorry that i have no caps but im getting a loss of 20-15 FPS when im switching from omega to catalyst also my 3dmark scores drop significantly
    anyone knows how to fix it

    ati x1600 128mb, 64-bit edition(bus bandwith) :(

    doom 3 benchmarks

    1024x768 all settings max without shadows
    catalyst
    5fps min-47max

    15fps min- 68max

    1280x800 all settings max. AA doesnt change performance

    FAr cry

    catalyst
    9 min-47 max

    23min-68 max

    omega 3dmark 05
    2670
    catalyst 3dmark 05
    2097

    catalyst 3dmark 06(AA off Ax off maximum performance)
    1135
    omega 3dmark 06(default)
    1356
     
  2. ikovac

    ikovac Cooler and faster... NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    872
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    hm strange
    I have no issues with catalysts. I have installed 7.8 yesterday. Runs smooth.
    I haven't benchmarked it yet. I will and report.

    I use vista 32 bit.

    Ivan
     
  3. wolfraider

    wolfraider Grand Viezir of Chaos

    Reputations:
    193
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    thanks for your time. i will be waiting for results :)
    maybe i should swith to vista?
     
  4. ikovac

    ikovac Cooler and faster... NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    872
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I have no omegas on my system, but my former results were quite good on x1600 256MB

    3dmark05 3,895 at 425/375 (default speeds)
    3dmark06 1,640 at 425/375 (default speeds)

    This was with catalyst 7.2.

    Now I am doing 7.8 tests

    Ivan
     
  5. ikovac

    ikovac Cooler and faster... NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    872
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    well 3dmark05 with 7.8 gives me 3923 at 425/375
    edit: 3dmark06 and 7.8 gives 1711 which is again better

    Ivan
     
  6. wolfraider

    wolfraider Grand Viezir of Chaos

    Reputations:
    193
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    had you ever tried omega i get almost same scores 1549 as you with 464/445(oc) eventhough my gpu specs are half of yours 128mb ram dedicated with 64bit busbandwith.

    i dont know which version of catalyst i have since when i click about i get thousands of numbers and it states something like v. 1.148.38867
     
  7. ikovac

    ikovac Cooler and faster... NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    872
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    lol.

    What omegas do you use? Latest. I can try tomorrow. But it seems that my scores are quite fast according to Orb. Damn I wish omega makes it even faster. :)
     
  8. ikovac

    ikovac Cooler and faster... NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    872
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    and OC at 560/464 i get:
    3dmark06 2155