The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Why don't ALL games have a built-in benchmarking feature?

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Mitlov, Dec 2, 2011.

  1. Mitlov

    Mitlov Shiny

    Reputations:
    2,681
    Messages:
    5,689
    Likes Received:
    909
    Trophy Points:
    281
    I've just installed Batman: Arkham Asylum, and I noticed that there's a benchmarking feature. With your current graphics settings, it'll run through certain scenes under certain conditions (covering the breadth of gameplay), and then report max FPS, min FPS, and average FPS. This allows you to tweak settings to ensure smooth gameplay throughout the game, instead of choosing something that "seems right" and suddenly discovering halfway through the game that on that particular scene, your machine can only pump out 11 FPS.

    It's brilliant, it's useful, it can't be hard for the game makers to do, and it's not in any other game I own. Why not?
     
    Mitlov, Dec 2, 2011
    #1
  2. DEagleson

    DEagleson Gamer extraordinaire

    Reputations:
    2,529
    Messages:
    3,107
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    116
    I think its because its not worth it.
    Some devs want to maximize profits, and working on a benchmark feature would take away valuable time.

    But i agree that popular games should have some sort of benchmark included.
     
    DEagleson, Dec 2, 2011
    #2
  3. Steven

    Steven God Amongst Mere Mortals

    Reputations:
    705
    Messages:
    986
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    *Shrugs* It's not something gamers care enough about to complain about.
     
    Steven, Dec 2, 2011
    #3
  4. redrazor11

    redrazor11 Formerly waterwizard11

    Reputations:
    771
    Messages:
    1,309
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Programming things takes time. Time costs money. Cheaper to release dev tools to community, and let them create their own damn bench demos :p
     
    redrazor11, Dec 2, 2011
    #4
  5. SomeRandomDude

    SomeRandomDude Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    71
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Because it's a feature that can be easily replaced by playing the game and tweaking things as you go along.
     
    SomeRandomDude, Dec 2, 2011
    #5
  6. dante316

    dante316 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    just use FRAPS.
     
    dante316, Dec 2, 2011
    #6
  7. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    BF3 has a very complex performance analysis monitoring widget in game, but no timedemo

    Lots of games have timedemos built in though. Lots and lots.

    I guess the primary reason that ALL games don't have that feature is because not all dev's add that feature :p
     
    masterchef341, Dec 3, 2011
    #7
  8. reaversedge

    reaversedge Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    271
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    31
    not all games but some games, depends on the devs priority. but for me working for the patch after the game's post release period is much better.
     
    reaversedge, Dec 4, 2011
    #8
  9. GamingACU

    GamingACU Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    388
    Messages:
    1,456
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    In b4 quality vs economics debate.

    Plus a decent amount of games have these now days (RE5, DMC4, Crysis just a couple off the top of my head).
     
    GamingACU, Dec 4, 2011
    #9
  10. Zymphad

    Zymphad Zymphad

    Reputations:
    2,321
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    355
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Metro 2033, Just Cause 2, STALKER COP, and Witcher 2 has something so you can test your settings.
     
    Zymphad, Dec 4, 2011
    #10
  11. InspiredE1705

    InspiredE1705 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    329
    Messages:
    328
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I played Batman Arkham Asylum and when I got to the part where you combat the "dream nightmare scene" - with the giant guy my FPS were 2 FPS at 1920 x 1200 on a Gefore 570 Superclocked HD vc. Normal fps was around 60+, but not for this scene!
     
    InspiredE1705, Dec 4, 2011
    #11
  12. Mechanized Menace

    Mechanized Menace Lost in the MYST

    Reputations:
    1,370
    Messages:
    3,110
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    116
    That doesn't seem right unless you had Physx and AA jacked up really high.
     
    Mechanized Menace, Dec 4, 2011
    #12
  13. lozanogo

    lozanogo Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    196
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    That doesn't sound right. Were the two FPS constant for a while (say more than 10 secs) or was it just the minimum recorded (probably a single dip)?
     
    lozanogo, Dec 5, 2011
    #13
  14. lua

    lua Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    what's the term from the id4 movie again? oh yeah. plausible deniability. it's better to keep gamers guessing or in the dark.
     
    lua, Dec 8, 2011
    #14