1024x768
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 1.80GHz
1Gb RAM
in high details?
-
absolutly not, maybe lowest if your lucky.
-
That is a brand new game, and looking at the graphics samples I'm seeing in my Internet searches...well, I'll put it this way.
It might run, it might not. The X3100 is not a gaming card, and I'd wager that either the card will barely run the game at the lowest settings or that it will not work at all. -
Not sure about the game but my friend is playing it on High resolution and High settings on his 8800GTS and he says it just spikes every once in a while.
The x3100 is a basic non-gaming graphics chipset, so I don't know how bad it'll run. -
on Nvidia NVS 140M?
-
StarScream4Ever Notebook Consultant
Yea it work, tried it.
Go here where i post the pics and more info.
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=148045&page=13 -
thats not playble, any card can just run a game, you said you averaged 6-9fps, how is that playbable? i know world in conflict still runs smoothly at low frames but thats abysmal, low frames being 15-20+
-
Mind you, being the type of game that it is, framerate below 20 will still be somewhat playable.
-
Yes, the x3100 will run WIC, though you'll have to experiment to get the best OS and driver combination for it.
-
StarScream4Ever Notebook Consultant
hey i had no problem playin throughout the game, FPS dips to 5-7 FPS mostly during heavy arty barrage.
-
It will run but don't expect any eye candy or the pretty destruction you would expect on high end machines.
-
It will only run on Vista systems. That's about the only advantage Vista drivers have over XP for the X3000/X3100. On XP, WIC just gives WinXP bluescreen.
-
ok
I will go with NVS 140M -
How is it now, anyone tried the 15.9 drivers?
-
Well, World in Conflict works with XP with driver versions 14.33 and onward.
-
10 is my personal limit for it. It's annoying under that but still playable until about 5. 12-15 is great imo.
Even though the official minimum is the GF6600 128MB, my GF6600 128 was able to stand a Low-Medium at 1024x768 so... -
Wow this is depressing, i gave it a try and even lowest of low at 640x480 it was barely playable
-
WIC is a hog. I was only getting around 10fps on my A8Js at 1280x800 mid/low detail.
-
-
That's still okay in WiC for people like me.
-
wic is a demanding game. its suppose to be visually stunning so playing it with a good card would be much more fun. 8600gt no prob.
intel x3100 no way, and there will be ALOT of artillery barrages in the game. 5-7fps is a joke and cant be considered playable.
for the ati x1270 though you can play it on low- medium settings and get a minimum of 25fps, max of 40fps, theres a test in the game that will help you get the optimal settings. -
I'm with Lokster on this one. There's no way I can enjoy a game when it's 5 to 7 FPS. In my book, "playable" means 30 FPS or higher for online play (when FPS really matters), and 20 FPS or higher for campaign modes.
-
Sneaky_Chopsticks Notebook Deity
...Stop digging up old threads. It's annoying.
-
-
I agree, theres a good discussion going on, its better than starting a whole new one. The game stutters, thats the issue, its 15FPS or so for a while, then explosion happens and its down to sub-10 FPS. I didnt find that playable, i wish i had more tolerance, because people who do are enjoying it.
-
WiC= 12
Oblivion = 25
BF2= 45
C&C3= 15
LOTRO= 30
World In Conflict and X3100 will it work?
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by neo1234, Oct 8, 2007.