acer 5670 x1400 3dmark05 = 1600+
hp dv6000t go7400 3dmark05 = 2000+
so hp got better gaming capabilities?![]()
-
-
Huh checking reviews like the latest on the HP dv6000, I see that the 3d2k5 scores of the x1400 and 7400 are both 2000+ so something in the acer must be limiting it whether it is cuz the x1400 in it is limited or the cpu or ram is.
-
ive heard alot of good about the dv6000t. but 3dmark on a mobile machine is based more on other aspecs of the system, ie cpu, ram. i would go with the hp cause its got a c2d. c2d outperforms the core duo anywhere from 13%-48%
-
Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator
Acers typically run hot - I would definitely go for the HP in this case because it has better build quality, a better keyboard, and similar performance. Don't base your assumptions off of 3DMark; it's a synthetic benchmark and is not all that useful for finding real-world performance. In gaming, the Go7400 and the X1400 have near identical performance, so it doesn't matter which one you get.
-
wow,
acer the 1st cd notebook released last year only got 15 minutes of fame
now its totally forgotten -
If you are comparing the score of this HP dv6000 and this Acer 5670 review then keep in mind that the Acer has a 1.6GHz Core Duo with 1GB while HP is a 2GHz Core 2 Duo with 2GB. In general X1400 is slightly faster than a Go 7400 (when the rest of the components are similar)
acer 5670 vs hp dv6000t
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by mindmyenglish, Mar 18, 2007.