The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    fx 1600m driver comparison cinebench

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by joystik, Mar 4, 2008.

  1. joystik

    joystik Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    STOCK DRIVERS-----------------------------------------------
    CINEBENCH R10
    ****************************************************

    Tester :

    Processor : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
    MHz :
    Number of CPUs : 2
    Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 5.1.2600

    Graphics Card : Quadro FX 1600M/PCI/SSE2
    Resolution : <800X600>
    Color Depth : <8BIT>

    ****************************************************

    Rendering (Single CPU): 2342 CB-CPU
    Rendering (Multiple CPU): 4243 CB-CPU

    Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.81

    Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 4462 CB-GFX


    ****************************************************


    174.31------------------------------------------------------
    CINEBENCH R10
    ****************************************************

    Tester :

    Processor : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
    MHz :
    Number of CPUs : 2
    Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 5.1.2600

    Graphics Card : Quadro FX 1600M/PCI/SSE2
    Resolution : <800X600>
    Color Depth : <8BIT>

    ****************************************************

    Rendering (Single CPU): 2257 CB-CPU
    Rendering (Multiple CPU): 4053 CB-CPU

    Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.80

    Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 5076 CB-GFX


    ****************************************************

    3dmark06
    stock drivers = 4876
    174.31 = 5153



    hopefully 174.31 wont screw up modeling for me.. I noticed that rendering time increased slightly.. but modeling time (opengl) is a bit better.
     
    joystik, Mar 4, 2008
    #1
  2. SonDa5

    SonDa5 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    96
    Messages:
    1,171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Good information.

    So the GeForce drivers do a decent job for modeling as well.
     
    SonDa5, Mar 4, 2008
    #2