if you have 2 systems that are identicle except for videocard (intel gpu vs nvidia/ati gpu), is battery life expected to differ at all if you are only doing 2d stuff like internet browsing or office apps?
if there is a difference, does anyone have any numbers? (i.e. intel laptop would last 3hr20min vs nvidia laptop last 3hr)
-
even though dedicated graphics cards power themselves down (nVidia PowerMizer/ATI PowerPlay), they still use more power than an integrated graphics card so the figure might look something like this (all other factors remain same)-------:
nVidia geforce 8400M GS--------3hrs
nVidia GeForce 8400M GT-------2.8hrs
nVidia GeForce 8600M GS-------2.5 hrs
nVidia geforce 8600M GT--------2.25 hrs
Intel GMA 950------------------5 hrs
Intel GMA x3100----------------4.5hrs
(NOTE---THESE ARE NOT ACTUAL TIMES/MEASUREMENTS AND ARE NOT TO SCALE...) -
~2hrs would be a lot more.
anyone have any actual numbers/benchmarks? no review site has ever tested this? -
If you aren't playing games or doing any 3D design work or heavy duty CAD work then why would you get a dedicated GPU? Intel's newest integrated GPU, the x3100, is a huge improvement over their last and should be available on all santa rosa platform notebooks without dedicated GPUs. So I recommend you get one with that.
-
-
It would be about 15-30 minutes depending on the other hardware and sofware in the system.
-
again, wish someone could do a simple battery rundown with a DVD on two of the same M1330's and a simple idle test with all the radios on and another with all the radio's off. 3 tiny benchmarks to tell the world HUGE things.
i think this would seriously be a HUGE thing in the notebook computing world. I know if i ever saw an article that was that solid on engadget i would jump to read it. Something so simple, yet no one has done it. Kills me!
integrated vs dedicated gpu battery life for 2d
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by her34, Aug 13, 2007.