I was wondering how my gpu compares to the 770m or 765m so I went to notebookcheck and saw some game benchmarks I tested grid 2, the 770m got 71 fps and I got 120fps same settings(high), I then tested ultra and got 37fps vs it's 31fps, whats going on and why do the 770m and 765m score so much higher in synthetic benchmarks but fall short in actual games, so do you guys think the 485m,6990m,580m are considered mid range or are they still high end cards 2.5 years later
-
-
Gaming at mid graphics 1080p or High at 720p is possible.
GTX485/580m still hold its own but i would never consider it a high end mobile GPU. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Mid range since the 780m is a huge stride ahead.
Results may vary on title and grid may be more memory bandwidth bound. The newer chips do run cooler and are easier to overclock more though. Typical that a high end of previous gen matches mid of the next though (4/5 (fermi) -> 6/7 (kepler)) -
It's a high end card but the performance with the current cards available is considered mid-range.
it's not a bad card, but not worth getting if you can get better cards for around the same price (or for not much more) -
i get 4k 3dmark11 msilover
780m gets 20fps crysis 3 maxed
485m gets 20 fps crysis 3 maxed
its 50 percent faster in synthetic benchmarks but not nessessarily in all games
edit. my combined score is higher than johns with a 780m i get 3300
overclocked
Graphics Score 3863
Physics Score 6411
Combined Score 3888 -
Highest valid 3dmark11 score for 780m NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3940XM,Alienware M18xR2 score: P9721 3DMarks
As you can see the 780m is over 3 times as fast. This goes for real gaming as well.
485m still kicks but gets pwned by the newercard which is normal.
When it comes to Crysis 3 even my brothers 690 Desktop card gets 10 FPS with MAX settings. -
10fps on max settings with a 690 shouldn't happen.
-
im still greatly enjoying my 485m with my games such as shogun2, wargame alb, etw, coh, coh2, dow2 and more. i play in ultra w/o anti aliasing and sometimes no vsync at 1080p.
-
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
If you see the 485m even close it is likely an error with the benchmark. -
yup i believe were at a point when hardware capabilities outstrip software requirements. gone are the days when you needed the latest and greatest desktop components to run the latest games and software. its what makes laptops so relevant these days. and even for mobile standards you dont need the very latest tech to enjoy the latest games.
-
indeed, am still happy with my overclocked super turbo charged 5850m
Still run new games great at 1080p and high settings except for a few very demanding titles. -
Not a chance in hell an overclocked GTX 485M can match a GTX 780M in Crysis 3.
Not even remotely close -
-
Most high end gpus are overkill for games these days. I believe the 780m specs wise isn't an underclocked 770gt , but an underclocked 680gtx due to it having he same core and shaders, but the gpu core is -250mhz and the memory is -500 on the 780m. The 485m is still a great card, it performs similar to the 760m or 675m.
-
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
They are but the 770 and 780M both have the same kind of turbo boost.
-
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
It wont turbo to the same degree, it's going to be behind a stock 770, but it is the architectural and firmware brother to it.
-
I just got off of work.
here goes nothing: I GET 20 FPS IN CRYSIS 3 MAXED VS 21
I GET 1283 COMBINED FIRESTRIKE SCORE VS 1500
I GET 38 FPS IN GRID 2 MAXED 8AA VS 48
What I don't get is how you guys think something then jump to a conclusion based off of synthetic benchmarks
edit. to upgrade would cost 850 nearly half the price of a new laptop. would it be wise to upgrade to have unplayable games still unplayable or playable games slighly faster -10fps -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Where are you getting your 780 numbers from? Notebookcheck?
A stock 780M run is:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/770761
So a combined score of 1925 so even with the CPU playing a role it's 50% faster. -
I went to 3dmark site and searched benchmark numbers...no need to be mean I agree when its not overclocked its generally 2x as fast
good day sir -
No reason to be upset that the 780m totally destroys ur card in every way possible. And no not worth to upgrade yet as the 485 still play all games
-
it's all good was just inquire -ing -
-
those OC 485m and stock 780m bench comparisons still seem wrong. There is no way even an insanely overclocked 485m can come within 35-40 percent of a 780m.
-
Will the 780m double the fps on average(in actual games) of an overclocked 485m?
Sent from a Galaxy far far away -
Yes sometimes more and sometimes less. Depending on the game.
-
i remember someone saying that the 680m is 30-60% the speed of the 485m in actual games; and the 780 is 20-30% the speed of the 680m so very well possible indeed.
i consider the 780m a very good upgrade to the 485m (if it could work on my machine lol). but im still enjoying my 485 and maxwell will arrive on 2014. but for those looking for more gpu power, i think this is an excellent upgrade.
is the 485m OCd considered mid range now?
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by itsjustme84, Jun 22, 2013.