The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    notebookcheck.com

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by ojchillinndc, Feb 24, 2009.

  1. ojchillinndc

    ojchillinndc Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    174
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    How acurate is notebookcheck.com? Should we consider the information on their site to be law, way off base, slightly off but okay, or take it with a grain of salt.
     
  2. heliopath

    heliopath Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    With the comparison of gfx cards, notebook check is not always correct... The comparisons that they give are not all tested similarily, e.g. different cpu's and amounts/type of ram in conjunction with the cards.
    Unless they have the particular model of laptop you want/have reviewed by them, it would be hard for them to be accurate as most notebooks have different components. Consider it slightly off but okay, However do accept that at times they may be wrong..
    hope this helps
     
  3. namaiki

    namaiki "basically rocks" Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    3,905
    Messages:
    6,116
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    216
    But they do give a range of scores and an average as well.

    I just hope that all the specs of the GPUs are correct because that's what I based my 9600m GT purchase on..
     
  4. steve-o

    steve-o Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I based the purchase of my machine on that as well.

    My M1710 used to have a 7900GTX (which I O/C'd by flashing with 7950 clocks).

    It's in the class up from the 9650. Because of the difference between the cards (the 7900 listed as much higher) I was in two minds. But reading on, the 9650 had better bench marks on some of the progs than the 7900 had, so I figured it was swings and roundabouts and bit the bullet.

    I wasn't really looking for an improvement in performance but just similar as I was upgrading for the screen, storage / blu ray etc.

    As it turns out with modded drivers, and a tweaked vista install the 9650 works just as well and better in some games, but worse in others, not totally sure why that is though, it's not like the 9650 works better in DX10 as most of the games it does better are in 9.

    For example SWG I could run on around 1280x1024 with the 7900 on medium and some high details and no shaddows, with the 9650 I can run native of 1920x1080 with everything on full (apart from shaddows but the 7900 wouldn't touch them).

    I guess you have to take into account I have double the ram now at 4gb and a slightly more powerful proc, but from experience I would say to read through all of the benchmarks thoroughly, and check the specs of the machines they compare it to. From my experience, it was pretty reflective, the 9650 is comparable and is better in some and worse in some, but I wouldn't say it was miles down from the 7900 or a totally different class.

    Cheers,
     
  5. Templesa

    Templesa Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    172
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    247
    Trophy Points:
    56
    It's a guideline site- not too bad for some quick info.
     
  6. Buhdahl

    Buhdahl Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    36
    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Notebookcheck lists the processor and memory when it says what a certain card got for a score, as well as the model of the notebook.
     
  7. Akuma

    Akuma Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    198
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's garbage. At least the listing for gpu's is and their 3DMarks.
     
  8. WILLY S

    WILLY S I was saying boo-urns

    Reputations:
    478
    Messages:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Great site!

    I always check this for gpu specs and sometimes for benchmarks or what laptops have a certain gpu.
     
  9. Kevin

    Kevin Egregious

    Reputations:
    3,289
    Messages:
    10,780
    Likes Received:
    1,782
    Trophy Points:
    581
    It's definitely not The Law, but it is good for a very basic guideline, and the listed clocks are generally correct, unless you're looking for DDR2 clocks. There are more than a few mistakes in the listed GPU hierarchy, that's why the forums are a better source of info.
     
  10. ichime

    ichime Notebook Elder

    Reputations:
    2,420
    Messages:
    2,676
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I agree. It's a good source for basic information and I like how they do a thorough review of the notebooks they obtain. I think what people find misleading is how they rank GPU performance; they take the average of all the scores of systems with the same GPU and post that number (although the individual scores are available under the details link). Because of this, some people get a different impression as to where certain GPUs rank in terms of performance.
     
  11. Delta_CT

    Delta_CT Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    102
    Messages:
    636
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Is there a better place than notebookcheck that I can find TDPs for different GPUs?
     
  12. ojchillinndc

    ojchillinndc Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    174
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    So when the list the 9800 GT ahead of the 3870, should one use that as a guideline or should they consider that to be just their opinion?
     
  13. WILLY S

    WILLY S I was saying boo-urns

    Reputations:
    478
    Messages:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    One should reference many sources to come to ones own conclusion rather than taking one source of information as gospel :)
     
  14. ojchillinndc

    ojchillinndc Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    174
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well so far, I found this site and that site. What other sites are there? You really can't count on the manufactuers site. You really expect them to say, "Yup, ATI's 3870's kick the tail out of our 9800s. Even we use them!"
     
  15. WILLY S

    WILLY S I was saying boo-urns

    Reputations:
    478
    Messages:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  16. Manic Penguins

    Manic Penguins [+[ ]=]

    Reputations:
    777
    Messages:
    1,493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I will give you a rough estimate of where your card lies. When comparing 2 or more cards that are close together on the chart, they can have quite different performances.
     
  17. IKAS V

    IKAS V Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,073
    Messages:
    6,171
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    281
    Notebookcheck.com is sort of a preliminary guide as to how they might perform, each system is different so yes it does give you a rough estimate as to where each GPU lies in performance, but look at other sources also.
     
  18. spradhan01

    spradhan01 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,392
    Messages:
    3,599
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Not that good!!!
     
  19. drfelip

    drfelip Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    43
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    As noted, you have to click the card you are interested in and look at the specs of the laptops used for that particular score.

    The ultimate database of laptop benchmarks does not yet exist.