I think I broke the world record.
I am using nvidia inspector and have a overclock of 415/440mem
I used razor cortex and process tamer
score was 9997 then i bumped clocks 5mhz
scoring 10 007
I was desperate to to see crysis 3 with 2tx and all maxed what id average with gunfights and light exploring
50PLUS exploring
43fps average shooting and running I can post a fraps average while playing an intense scene to see a super accurate average.
so if you own a 965m and are curious to see what this puppy can do when pushed to the limits...post below what you want me to test
ps.
does anyone here own a 970m? curious as to how a overvolted and overclocked 965m compares to a stock 970m with good drivers?
-
Have you compared your world record 3DM11 score against this 965m? http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/9839754
Btw Nice score
what laptop?
Last edited: Jun 9, 2016 -
thanks took me a week.
im pretty sure 13000 is sli his cards didnt report or something....cuz this baby is pushed beyond the max.
if it said 10500-11500 i might. just might believe it.
I only trust benchmarks with standard cpus not xeon of s processors.
am i alone on that 3dmark being fake?
with a score of 10k do you think i can max witcher 3? -
What's the problem with S and Xeons?
-
The P570ZM Papu posted is a single GPU system with its standard processor, nothing special there. (Clevo simply uses desktop CPUs in their high-end gaming rigs)
Never the less good job! You have the fastest one with mobile CPU, so all reason to be happy!
Last edited: Jun 9, 2016Vasudev, James D, Kade Storm and 3 others like this. -
thanks prema and all.
so that 13k score is legit? -
prema im overvolting by 75mv is that too much for ge62-2qe-003us
-
Yes, it's legit. What you likely should compare is not 3DMark score but Graphics score. Maybe your GPU score is higher.Kade Storm and Papusan like this.
-
The title did suggest GPU score though. Impressive results either way.
-
yea before (svet-god bless) modded my vbios my best was 8300 roughly...and an average of 36 in crysis...10k now with the ability to play crysis 3 at veryhigh 16x and 4tx at 36-56fps average of 42...its probably a higher average but when i running and gunning its above 40...
now stock i would typically get 26fps average. im going to show you how this card doesnt just overclock well but how its overclock affects in game performance. I will be back im going to post crysis 3 average with stock then oc... -
I suppose. Though a 3000+ point difference for a 965M if he's OC'd it as far as he claims is rather huge. 965Ms don't exactly hit 1800MHz or anything, you know. I think the best thing would be for us to actually link us his score.TBoneSan likes this.
-
STOCK
CRYSIS 3 MAXED
Frames, Time (ms),
Min, Max, Avg
1721, 60000, 23, 33, 28.683
CRYSIS 3 MAXED
OVERCLOCKED
Frames, Time (ms),
Min, Max, Avg
2376, 60000, 33, 58, 39.600
Next ill post project cars MAXED playing in a storm with 31 unique cars and dsx4 AA -
my score was unoffical...it was done without online comparison but my scores can be found under r_yan_evans at 3dmark.com i think i came like 16th with 9981 gpu but was lower because of cpu
-
Do it officially then =D.
If we could search for it, you could link it to us. Official or not. -
Never say that the bench score is fake, until you have all the facts
No bench score is valid before it is posted at http://www.3dmark.com/search?_ga=1.122763149.76747106.1464104204
Why not post all your scores there? Sign up and post all your bench there for later comparison.
Nor forget That 3DM11 score is higher with Win 7. Win Crap X give lower scores. -
Project CARS MAXED MAXED AA dsx4
STOCK
Frames, Time (ms),
Min, Max, Avg
1152, 60000, 14, 22, 19.200
notice its unplayable
OVERCLOCKED
Frames, Time (ms),
Min, Max, Avg
1462, 60000, 20, 28, 24.367
now its playable
I dont see the need for dsx4 and fxaa set to high as the visual differance is nihl
ill post it maxed without the needlessly doubled aa.
STOCK MAXED
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
1565, 60000, 20, 35, 26.083
OVERCLOCKED MAX
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
1783, 60000, 16, 45, 29.717
3.7 fps more might not seem like much but i started at the begining of the loading notice max of 35 now max of 45. I essentially get 10fps more with an overclock. -
papusan
most of my benchmarks are posted under r_yan_evans
top 10 or 5 depending on if you count the odd ball unusually high scores that probably have tesslation disabled..
i wont knock his score but im overclocked 400/400 roughly his would have to be 900/1000 + do you gentleman believe hes overclocked 900/1000 over stock...seems unrealistically high...each to his own though -
It sure is, here a similar system with 10k in Firestrike: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4882350
I don't know your cards ASIC, so can't say if 75mv is a lot. What's the actual voltage you are using?
These boards should max out at 1.2v, everything more than that steals its fuel from other components.Papusan likes this. -
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div id="inner-editor"></div>
What OS did you use in your 3DM11 bench? Win 7 will give much higher bench score!! -
top legit score for gpu by someone else
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11073244
my score untill i run an official bench again
ok finished i changed some settings by accident now its lower by a touch
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11314683
cpu is overheating for some reason
im benching with windows 10 64bit home -
prema 1.037v hopefully im not frying it
maybe you awesome people can help me get top score for overall -
Use Win 7 for 3DM11 if you want highest score!! Win 8.1 or Crap X for firestrike. What's your asic score... Use gpu-z.
Use better paste. Liquid metal is the best if you dare to use it. -
Agreed. Toss Windows 10 for benchmarking.
Re-paste your CPU with ICD using the thin line method.Last edited: Jun 9, 2016Papusan likes this. -
ok im going to do exactly what you say.. i know you guys know what your doing more so than me...dare i say geniuses?
ok heres the proof....
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11314731 -
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11314751
with my cpu overclocked -
im using GTA V drivers.
Whats the best nvidia drivers for overclocking or 3dmark 11 -
You can try 362.00 and 365.19. Have you tried Throttlestop?
-
papusan thank you very much
im using 365.19 gained like 20 points aka 10mhz
how would i install windows 7 and have windows 10 also aka dual boot...my problem is i dont have a usb stick -
That was done with an Egpu setup (see secondary gpu tab, R9 290x)
Guys ... you both should know better!!!
-
Yeah no. Line for bare die mobile CPUs is the only good method. Cross method is for IHS-using chips which he does not have.
You have a MSI GE62 with a 4720HQ that you're attempting to overclock. What do you really expect?
Your CPU ain't holding that clockspeed. I can guarantee that. Your Physics score is ridiculously low; even using W8 or W10 over W7 can't get it that low by default. I once ran the bench and my CPU didn't turbo and I had 8000+ physics score; you're in the 5000 range. Something is WRONG.
I suggest closing everything down and letting the laptop cool well before trying the benchmark. Even if you want to turn it off, remove the backplate, shove it at an AC vent for a while, replace backplate quickly, turn it on, apply OC, and immediately run benchmarks while heatsinks are still cold, that should let you get a proper score. Benching is benching, sir. It doesn't mean everyday usage. I have a screenshot I like to pass around of me adding +257MHz on my already-superclocked 780Ms (svl7's vBIOS overclocks them from 721MHz + boost to 850MHz) and showing BF4 running without a crash, but in about 3 minutes that'd fry in my room's default heat if I were to game on it.
Good catch. I was wondering why the disparity was so heavy between them. Checking my OLD 780M SLI score, my graphics score was about 14k, so the R9 290X used for that run for a 13K+ score makes a lot more sense.
I'm bad at reading benchmark scores D=.
Don't ask how I can be bad at that. I am okay D=. -
I was thinking GPU for some reason but typing CPU. Line method is best, yes.
Too much on my mind, I guess. -
my cpu needs a repaste in web browsing im idle at 75c
-
HOW
-
Yes, yes you do. My 4.4Ghz 2920XM runs 43-46 degrees when web browsing, so you definitely need a repaste and an undervolt.TomJGX likes this.
-
obviously im a rookie at this.
temps are down while using cooler boost....idles around 40c repasted with ICD7
X method
Wondering why with low temps my cpu score is still so low. someone chime in, checkingtosee if its because im not using throttle stopPapusan likes this. -
Read the thread started by @D2 Ultima ... Mobile i7 CPU information
Especially the chapter... HQ chips and Their Power Limitations
Edit. X method is wrong on mobile processors. Use the thin line method!!Last edited: Jun 9, 2016 -
Great job!! Congrats!!
+rep -
im notgoing to win any awards for cpu scores lol
im trying everything and i read the thread on mobile i7s thing is iscore low without overclock also around 6k ill post my new cpu score
also thank you
ps.
im not going to be using these clocks for gaming obviously as overvolting can cause damage or shorten the lifespan of a card, as was the case with my old 260m laptop -
clocks
250/420
v0.926
cpu at 38x
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11315860
this is what i game athmscott likes this. -
hopefully NBR accepts me....Im not the coldest beer in the fridge as a warning
hmscott likes this. -
Just continue with tweaking. Most people here at NBR enjoy benchmarks!!
Edit. Here are some goals for you and your hardware http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_i7_4720hq/Last edited: Jun 10, 2016hmscott likes this. -
ok cool ill see what i can do
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11315916
speed step disabled
v+50mv
355/420
9700gpu 5000cpu
50mv overvolt is pretty safe...i was worried when i set it to +75mv -
As far as maxwell goes, as long as you keep it cool enough, it should be fine with voltage. You're staying under 1.2v so you'll be fine. CPU however should be undervolted as much as possible without hindering stability or performance. And you can't hit 3.8GHz. I suggest keeping your 1-core and 4-core loads the same. It just saves with stability.
-
I've got a 970m, I did a few benchmarks a few months back (Using driver 359.14). These are the results I got:
I've also got some game results if you want themryanev84 likes this. -
oh nice....not sure why my card a 965m nearly matches a 970m overclocked. go figure
also experts please chime in....i think i fried my card. wont allow me to change voltage or memory clocks anymore...im not getting artifacts or anything its performance is stuck on stock or with a core overclock.
msi power management is frustrating...im guessing its because my battery is at 60 percent and since it drains battery while gaming it might need the extra power to overclock mem ect...out of ideas -
Nearly? He's using the stock vBIOS limit; you've got a much higher OC. The core difference between the two cards isn't all that big. He's still about 1000 points better than your best OC on graphics for 3DM11 too.
Don't know if it affects YOUR model but MSI is known for that. -
thanks D2
check this one out
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11316212
425/425
+87.5mv
im trying to break 11k now...crossing fingers -
Are you closing everything nonessential before running that? The Physics score is too low to even consider the "I'm not on W7" deal. Have you tried throttlestop?
worlds fastest 965m broke 10000 3dmark11 gpu
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by ryanev84, Jun 9, 2016.