The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    x1400 vs. HD3470

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Matt is Pro, Sep 9, 2008.

  1. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I'm really wanting to get my hands on the Lenovo Thinkpad T400. I was wondering how the HD3470 stacks up to what I currently have; the x1400.

    I don't game very often, sans AoE2, AoE3, Spore and Fable. Nothing to demanding and nothing my current setup can't handle.

    I know that the HD3400 series is basically a remake of the HD2400 series with DX10.1 among other things.

    So... x1400 vs. HD3470 ... GO!
     
  2. link1313

    link1313 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    It won't be a huge upgrade. Might be around the same as jumping from the x1400 to the x1600/x1700.

    That being said theres a lot of advantages to the T400 over the dell 6400. Smaller form factor, montevina platform, hybrid-graphics, DDR3 memory, wimax, led screen, etc.
     
  3. McBrainless

    McBrainless Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well my notebook also has x1400 and my friends XPS1330 jas nVidia 8400GS wich is quite noticebly better than my x1400. And since I hear that the 3470 is even better than the 8400 I say it's a go, if you're not after 36xx series or nvidia 9600 performance.
    There should be a fairly good amount of difference between the two.
     
  4. rschauby

    rschauby Superfluously Redundant

    Reputations:
    865
    Messages:
    1,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  5. Thaenatos

    Thaenatos Zero Cool

    Reputations:
    1,581
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    231
    if an x1400 handles your games well then it wont be too noticeable other then a better ability to play future games. Youll be more then happy.

    Thats a pretty big upgrade if you ask me. :p
     
  6. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    That's pretty much why I'm wanting the T400.

    What I was worried about was the difference in the memory interface:

    x1400 = 128bit; HD3470 = 64bit. ( Unless I'm wrong :rolleyes: )
     
  7. foosa123

    foosa123 adsfjldsajflkajsdfa

    Reputations:
    210
    Messages:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    i recently just made the switch from an x1400 (dell 6400) to an hd3470 (sony sr) and although i havent tested many games yet, in CS:S i used to get average 40fps and now on the sony i get average 80fps (this is with all settings on high). hope this helps somehow :)
     
  8. link1313

    link1313 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Well theres a perfect example :) . ^ ^

    Actually im pretty sure the Dell 6400 has a 64-bit version of the x1400. You can always use GPU-Z to check though.

    Is the 3470 really 64-bit? Eh i guess its ok if you don't game a lot. Personally I would go with the T500.
     
  9. Wraith of Vern

    Wraith of Vern Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    16
    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I upgraded from a x1600 Mobility 256mb, to my current 8600m GT and notice very much an increased frame rate in WoW, as well as being able to run Sins of a Solar Empire at more than Mid or so, which is all that the x1600 is supposed to be able to handle, where i run at Highest.

    I would say go for it, i upgraded from my F3Ja to this after only 14-18 months of having it.
     
  10. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    View attachment 23962

    Yeah, the x1400 in my Dell is 64bit :eek: . My bad.

    Anyone have GPU-Z pic of the HD3470 we can compare to?
     
  11. foosa123

    foosa123 adsfjldsajflkajsdfa

    Reputations:
    210
    Messages:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    here you go:
    [​IMG]
     
  12. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Wow...

    I dunno if something is off or what... but look at the immense difference between the pixel and texture fill rates!! Also, what's with the GPU clock? 74.71 GHz?? Lolz!

    I like the GDDR3 Memory and the increased bandwidth!
     
  13. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Any ideas why the fill rates are so different?
     
  14. mobius1aic

    mobius1aic Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    240
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The picture is obviously re-touched or whatever. Either way the HD 3400 is about twice as powerful as the X1400 in most real world cases, depending on game and the amount of VRAM you have.