The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    FPS on RE5 Benchmark application.

    Discussion in 'Gateway and eMachines' started by rnr80, Jul 17, 2009.

  1. rnr80

    rnr80 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I have a 6860fx with the stock processor.

    I downloaded the RE5 Benchmark application yesterday and was curious to check the FPS my system would manage.

    I tried the VARIABLE Benchmark -
    DX10
    1280X720X32bit
    VSYNC - ON
    MOTION BLUR - ON
    AA - HIGHEST
    TEXTURES - HIGH for ALL 3 options.

    I tried about 10 iterations and got an avg of 29fps..Yah u may call me crazy for running the same thing over and over again..but for me, seeing a game run on my laptop even if I dont control it..is a joy in itself!

    So did anyone else try it..? Please post specs , settings and fps.
    BTW the graphics on RE5 look really nice even on my rather low-end Gateway!

    CHeers!
     
    rnr80, Jul 17, 2009
    #1
  2. massive77

    massive77 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    downloading now.. I will do the test just to see.

    *See Signature for Gamer Specs*

    Best FPS - TBD.. testing now..
     
    massive77, Jul 18, 2009
    #2
  3. massive77

    massive77 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    so I got 56.2 FPS on the Vairable Benchmark.

    Directx 10
    1280x720
    vsync on
    anti-aliasing
    motion blur on
     
    massive77, Jul 18, 2009
    #3
  4. massive77

    massive77 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    On the fixed, I scored 35.9 with the same settings as I did on the variable.

    :)
     
    massive77, Jul 18, 2009
    #4
  5. rnr80

    rnr80 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    SWEET!! The graphics are good, arent they..?
    Hope it turns out to be a good game!
     
    rnr80, Jul 18, 2009
    #5
  6. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431
    I prefered it 1920x1200 all HQ with no AA. I got 35 FPS on Variable. The demo was liquid smooth at these settings..............
     
    TANWare, Jul 18, 2009
    #6
  7. rnr80

    rnr80 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    All HQ, no AA , 1440X900 , DX10 gives me ~35 on variable.

    Well Im getting a X7900 soon, just was wondering wat FPS I wld get with the new processor.

    I hav heard ppl say a processor might not have much of a say for an FPS, but wld make more of a difference in an RTS..which kind of makes sense.
     
    rnr80, Jul 18, 2009
    #7
  8. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431
    The CPU does make a difference where the non 3D programing is used. As an example I got about 9200 in 3DMark06 with the p8200 but with the p9600 I get 10400 and at 1028x800 I just pushed 11119..............

    For the p7805 the p9600 is a nice ballance, although the t9900 just keeps calling my name. I swear I can hear my computer seductively whispering "just buy me big boy, you know you want too" every time I see that CPU on ebay............... :)
     
    TANWare, Jul 18, 2009
    #8