Well basically, my laptop wasn't cutting it anymore (in sig). L4D was running at an average 30FPS on medium settings at 1440x900 and that isn't acceptable to me.
So I decided to go back to desktops for my main gaming rig and spent a good $900 on the following: Intel E8500 3.16GHZ || ASUS P5Q-E || XFire Sapphire Radeon 4850 || Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer || Corsair 4GB Ram || (1)WD 640GB HDD
I'm hoping I can at least run my games at 1680 x 1050 on high settings with this new build, which I believe I will be able to do without a sweat.
However, I began to think how much of a performance boost would I see if I just upgraded my laptop's CPU to a T9300 ($330 off newegg). You think I'd be able to run a somewhat constant 60 FPS in L4D, at least 1680 x 1050 on high with the CPU upgrade? Anyone here put in a T9300 in their 6831-FX? What kind of numbers are you getting.
Decisions, decisions.
Edit: Nevermind. I found my answer, which is that upgrading to a T9300 would only help so much, but not enough for me. If a mod wants to delete this thread they can.
- 
 
 - 
 
 
i got a T8300, about 3-5 FPS increase in most FPS, more in RTS. i don't believe a T9300 can do much better than that from what i have heard
 - 
 
 
Isn't Left for Dead a source game though? And aren't source games traditionally heavily CPU dependent?
 - 
 Yes, but only so much.
 - 
 
 
lol that was def a driver issue man, you should have been fine to max that game, i guess depending on how many units are on the screen, that stock CPU might not cut it.
 - 
 Nah. The updating to the newest laptopvideo2go drivers helped, but still doesn't satisfy me.
 - 
 
 
so how much did it help?
 - 
 
 
i run L4D maxed 1920x1200 on my FX.. capped 50fps smooth
 
Just bought a desktop rig to replace my laptop but...
Discussion in 'Gateway and eMachines' started by thegooch69, Nov 21, 2008.