not interested in benchmark but say, if i were to play some like crysis..
would 4850 give me extra 2-3 frames over 9800m gts?
-
its only several percent faster, maybe up to 5% in most cases.
-
Ati is coming strong..
-
-
im sure its a LITTLE better, but ATI has horrible support for glitches with 3d modeling programs like autocad and rhinoceros.
most ati cards have problems with 3d modeling and rendering programs.
thats why many professionals use nvidia quadros or just simply nvidia. -
actually.. I think it STOMPS the GTS. And I'm a gts fan
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=349540 -
I think it can't beat the M GTS completely. I guess those guys just have similar performance, at least in DMC4.
4850:
http://i42.tinypic.com/dq5av9.jpg
9800M GTS:
http://i438.photobucket.com/albums/qq103/MrCigar/DMC.jpg
Don't know how well can 4850 performs in Crysis Warhead (ingame of course) but with 9800M GTS (512mb version only), i think it performed quite good, even with P8400. In fact, I got 22 as minimum FPS in Crysis Warhead, 1280x800, Enthusiast, DX9, Windows Vista 64bit. (Although I know thatATI always bad in Crysis)
In other scenes, the FPS always stays in about 27-32, some scene like Coast, where don't have many movement, the FPS could go higher. I think that's quite good for 9800M GTS.
Any idea? I don't know how well can 4850 performs with this settings. -
yea not even contest, it obliterates the GTS
how much better is 4850 mobile compared to 9800m gts 1gb?
Discussion in 'Gateway and eMachines' started by shin777, Mar 27, 2009.