The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    1.35v vs. 1.5v memory, need a quick answer....

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by ntrain96, Jan 9, 2012.

  1. ntrain96

    ntrain96 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    564
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    My laptop is the P180HM (desktop replacement basically), so Im not worried about power consumption. Grabbin some DDR3 1333mhz memory from Crucial. I have the choice of grabbing 1.35v or 1.5v memory. Is there any reason to choose one over the other? Performance or OCing differences? Or just power/heat savings only with the lower rated voltage ram? Need to order up within the hour so hoping for a quick answer. :)

    thanks! :D
     
  2. Deks

    Deks Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,272
    Messages:
    5,201
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    331
    I would say it makes little to no difference both battery and heat wise.

    RAM is nothing but a miniscule aspect of your computer and the least of your worries.
    The screen is still the largest power sucker out of all the hardware in your laptop anyway.

    Take whichever is the cheapest.
     
  3. Duct Tape Dude

    Duct Tape Dude Duct Tape Dude

    Reputations:
    568
    Messages:
    1,822
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    56
    There's not much difference. If anything the higher voltages will let you OC the modules a little faster, but even then your OCing efforts are best spent on the GPU and CPU.

    Usually the screen is the biggest drain but with laptops this big the GPU and CPU start to really bog down your battery life.
     
  4. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    Depending on the physical design and install location, of course it will make a difference in heat buildup.

    I would take the 1.35V option, even for a slight price premium.

    Anything that keeps the system running cooler is worth it in the long run, imo.

    And with today's current cpu's that adjust Turbo automatically based on temps... you are basically getting (potential) 'free' performance (via higher Turbo 'bins').
     
  5. SlickDude80

    SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,262
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    does the 1.35v memory cost more? I assume it will cost like double. and if that's the case, i wouldn't buy them because you save a little on energy (so its a more eco friendly choice) but the difference is miniscule.

    I'd also check your mobo compatibility with 1.35v sodimm.
     
  6. Ari3sgr3gg0

    Ari3sgr3gg0 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Laptop screen as the biggest drain? o.0 Maybe back in the day but I know my screen uses roughly 5-15 watts of power on max brightness. Led screens are much more power friendly and it's the processors/graphics cards that really draw power.
     
  7. R3d

    R3d Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,515
    Messages:
    2,382
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    66
    It really doesn't make much of a difference. If the 1.35v RAM is cheap, go for it but if it costs significantly more than the 1.5v RAM then I would say to just skip it and get the 1.5v.
     
  8. Deks

    Deks Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,272
    Messages:
    5,201
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    331
    LED screens are more efficient than CCFL screens, but mostly in terms of longevity.
    The power requirements for LED's are smaller and it's contributing sure, but not in tremendous amounts.

    Furthermore, CPU's and GPU's are continuously optimized to use less power, and while I will agree that those 2 certainly are among the biggest power consumption based hardware, the screens remain by far the largest power sucker unfortunately.

    That, and the fact that batteries have been stagnating for next to 2 decades now.
     
  9. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    For P180HM, I'd say it doesn't matter. For a netbook, take the 1.35V, and a single stick at that for best battery life.