The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    1.6GHZ C2D or 2.0GHZ C2D ?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Mr. Burns, Dec 17, 2006.

  1. Mr. Burns

    Mr. Burns Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    is there much difference between the two when it comes to performing ususal tasks (i.e. internet surfing, photoshop, microsoft office etc...)?

    is the extra price worth it for the 2GHZ?
     
    Mr. Burns, Dec 17, 2006
    #1
  2. Gautam

    Gautam election 2008 NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,856
    Messages:
    3,564
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    For only basic tasks, 1.6 ghz should be fine.

    Do keep in mind that L2 cache is doubled when you go to 2.0 + ghz C2D chips.
     
    Gautam, Dec 17, 2006
    #2
  3. Charles P. Jefferies

    Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    22,339
    Messages:
    36,639
    Likes Received:
    5,080
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Both CPUs are fast and you will not notice a difference doing regular stuff. Photoshop will be quicker on the 2.0GHz chip though, that is pretty hard on the CPU. How heavy of a Photoshop user you are however, I do not know. Sounds like you don't need the extra power. You are best off investing in more RAM and a faster hard drive; the latter especially will make a big difference.
     
    Charles P. Jefferies, Dec 17, 2006
    #3
  4. hakkafusion

    hakkafusion Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Photoshop > pc~ lolol
    especially with cs3 out now... idk, i haven't tried it.
    but it should be interesting =b
    i don't think the extra $200 or w/e is worth it for the 7200 compared to 55/5600... go with 5600... imo~
     
    hakkafusion, Dec 17, 2006
    #4