The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    1600x900 Res VS 1920x1080 Res

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Undecided84, Aug 3, 2010.

  1. Undecided84

    Undecided84 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    On a 16" laptop, is there a noticeable difference between 1600x900 and 1920x1080? If so, how big of a difference is it? Is it worth paying an extra $150 for the upgrade? thanks.
     
  2. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    It really depends on your eyes, though even some people with 20/20 don't like 1920x1080 since things are too small and they don't like to use the zoom function.
     
  3. Undecided84

    Undecided84 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    are the video and picture quality noticeably better though?


    and what about 310M GPU (512MB VRAM) vs 330M GPU (1GB VRAM). How big of a difference is that and what does it effect? video quality for movies or just game graphics quality?
     
  4. woofer00

    woofer00 Wanderer

    Reputations:
    726
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    "Better" is a very subjective term. For me, better means a sharper image, regardless of resolution. For others, better means fitting the most on the screen simultaneously, regardless of size (I used to be in this category). On a 900 vert screen, the best quality will be when 720p video is limited to 720p and not stretched to 900 pixels tall. I find stretching to fill distorts, so I go either as close to 720p as possible or 1080p, depending on the display, without going in between.

    As far as the GPUs, it won't really affect your movie quality, just graphics-intensive programs, including games.
     
  5. Charles P. Jefferies

    Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    22,339
    Messages:
    36,639
    Likes Received:
    5,076
    Trophy Points:
    931
    What size screen and resolution are you using now?
     
  6. Undecided84

    Undecided84 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    15.6" screen, 1366 x 768 resolution.
     
  7. bc2946088

    bc2946088 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    70
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    15.6" screen and 1920x1080, two windows sharing 50% of the screen is very nice. I thought that Windows 7 feature was lame. I was wrong.

    The vertical resolution is rather meaningless for this example. So just a gross estimate of 2 browser windows. 2 800px websites or 2 960px websites. It makes a difference for me. If you don't mind seeing small text of course or using the zoom. I don't use the zoom and very happy with it.
     
  8. Undecided84

    Undecided84 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    thanks. for me better means sharper image. so 720p and 1080p videos will still look good with a 1600x900 resolution screen?
     
  9. Mastershroom

    Mastershroom wat

    Reputations:
    3,833
    Messages:
    8,209
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    206
    I'd go for the 1080p...hell, if I could, I'd get 2560x1600 on my 12" netbook.
     
  10. woofer00

    woofer00 Wanderer

    Reputations:
    726
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    He mentioned movies and games, not text. Of course for text, every last pixel is essential if you're trying to cram more on the screen at one time.

    Regarding the sharper image, most people will say yes, it's perfect and crisp and looks great. But I'm a picky naysayer, and I like to see pixels 1:1 instead of expanded/shrunk to 900 from 720 or 1080. :D
     
  11. Charles P. Jefferies

    Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    22,339
    Messages:
    36,639
    Likes Received:
    5,076
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I highly recommend the 1080p screen if feel your eyes can handle a bit smaller text. Windows 7 has very good built-in font scaling so the transition should be easy.

    I find that a higher resolution screen greatly helps productivity. Less scrolling, you can see more stuff on the screen at the same time, and you can practically use two windows side-by-side (unlike 1366x768/1600x900).
     
  12. woofer00

    woofer00 Wanderer

    Reputations:
    726
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    For me, the limit on using two windows side-by-side is physical size, not resolution. I just zoom out the text til I'm comparing half-width to half-width. The toolbars are unfortunately rarely ever scaled, but the title bar, text, and buttons can be shrunk down.
     
  13. hendra

    hendra Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    157
    Messages:
    2,020
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I have 16.4" screen and I am very happy with 1600. 1920 gives you smaller fonts. Far too far too small for my eyes. Sure you can increase the DPI but that would defeat the purpose of having a higher resolution. Not to mention that all your games would run slower, since they have to crank more pixels. You can lower the resolution but LCD looks best at its native resolution.

    So, I would recommend 1600. What good would a higher resolution be if you can't read it?
     
  14. bc2946088

    bc2946088 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    70
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    If your eyes can handle the increase in resolution I don't see why you wouldn't do it.

    I set everything to 100% and have no problems and feel like I have a lot more space to manipulate windows around.
     
  15. Melody

    Melody How's It Made Addict

    Reputations:
    3,635
    Messages:
    4,174
    Likes Received:
    419
    Trophy Points:
    151
    The best thing would be to see if a local store has laptops in the 15.6"-16" sizes with those resolutions so you can play with them and decide. Nobody can really tell you your preferences. If you feel more comfortable with one or the other pick that.

    I'm assuming this is the Sony F we're talking about judging from the GPU selections. Might wanna maybe check the Sony subforum to see what panel Sony uses for each resolution in your area, because maybe that'd play a factor.
     
  16. Undecided84

    Undecided84 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    thanks for all the replies.

    i could save $250 by buying the 900p laptop and then use that money to buy a larger 1080p monitor. would that work? or are $200 monitors not equipped with quality screens? or am i just better off buying the laptop with 1080p?
     
  17. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    If you're mainly going to use your notebook on a desk, then I would always save the money and get a nice monitor.