The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    2013 CPUs and GPUs

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by stege, Aug 6, 2012.

  1. stege

    stege Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    We know 2013 will bring the Haswell CPU but what about GPUs? Will nVidia and AMD bring new architectures or shrink/rebrand existing ones?

    Thank you. Sorry if this has already been covered somewhere else.
     
  2. maverick1989

    maverick1989 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    332
    Messages:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    56
    nVidia has this in store for Maxwell, their new architecture they will announce in 2013 and release in 2014.

    AMD, afaik, has kept mum.

    Both companies have rebranded existing GPUs for the next generation for quite a while now (I think nvidia more than AMD) so I would expect a rebrand similar to 500-600, considering how well the 680m has performed. Their die shrink is also following the trend given approximately two years between the each of the last two shrinks.

    Most of the stuff I have said is speculation because that is what prediction will be for two years in the semicon industry.
     
  3. Karamazovmm

    Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!

    Reputations:
    2,365
    Messages:
    9,422
    Likes Received:
    200
    Trophy Points:
    231
    people at anandtech think that we are transitioning to a 2 year refresh cycle for gpus.

    Im not expecting anything ground breaking. I do hope that they give us something better in the mid range, at least some new cores
     
  4. Deks

    Deks Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,272
    Messages:
    5,201
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    331
    I would have preferred usage of synthetic diamonds and graphene in cpu's and gpu's.
    Of course, that would require getting rid of silicon all-together in order to see 40-80 (maybe 100) times increase in efficiency/power/speed/capabilities (at 10 times lower power consumption than current computers) - which neither Intel, Nvidia or AMD are crazy enough to go for because they are commercialized firms with profits in mind - and switching over to those 2 materials wold be 'costly' (in terms of money of course, not actual resources).

    Then again, they might start using both in minute quantities first in hybrid form to slightly augment existing silicon chips - instead of using them from the get go (synthetic diamond chips in electronics since 1997 and graphene since 2005 - at least in somewhat hybrid form).

    Perhaps by 2020 we will start seeing those 2 materials in minute quantities in electronics that boost capabilities - but they won't be crazy enough to switch over completely because they can still milk silicon until they dry out the market (even though as a material its way obsolete).
     
  5. stege

    stege Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    so is gasoline... :mad:
     
  6. Karamazovmm

    Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!

    Reputations:
    2,365
    Messages:
    9,422
    Likes Received:
    200
    Trophy Points:
    231
    not this again... R&D aint free, nor those factories, nor the training....
     
  7. R3d

    R3d Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,515
    Messages:
    2,382
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    66
    ^That. The reason graphene isn't used is the same reason why Intel didn't use 22nm back in 2005... Because nobody knew how to implement it yet. R&D takes time. Those companies do have motivation to use graphene/diamonds/whatever new materials because it'll give them an edge over the competition. If they didn't care about speed or efficiency, then we wouldn't see smaller nm processes or updated architectures either.