Which one should I buy?
Corsair Vengeance
Specs:
- Speed: 2133MHz
- Timing: 11-11-11-27
- Type: DDR3L
Kingston HyperX
- Format: SODIMM
- Pin Out: 204 Pin
- Voltage: 1.35V
Specs: DDR3L, 2133MHz, CL11, 1.35V, Unbuffered,
Timings: 2133MHz, 11-12-13
-
G.SKILL Ripjaws 32GB (4 x 8G) 204-Pin DDR3 SO-DIMM DDR3L 2133 Laptop Memory Model F3-2133C11Q-32GRSL
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ..._re=F3-2133C11Q-32GRSL-_-20-231-776-_-Product
G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 16GB (2 x 8G) 204-Pin DDR3 SO-DIMM DDR3L 2133 (PC3L 17000) Laptop Memory Model F3-2133C11D-16GRSL
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231760D2 Ultima likes this. -
WOW those are cheap, I should look into getting some =O
-
in the end it doesnt really matter, just go with the cheapest offer u can find
although ive been thinking about switching out my corsair sticks with hyperx impact, since ive seen successful reports of them being oced to 2400 mhz...
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk -
Feel free to dispose of your old corsair sticks by sending them to Trinidad
I heard there's a really good P370SM3 dump here that they'd fit well in.alexhawker and jaybee83 like this. -
Edit: Got it cheaper, now more expesnive lol.. -
Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow
My question is, do you really need 2133 Mhz RAM? I thought most laptops don't natively support that sort of RAM speed, so if you were hoping for significantly better performance....prepare to be much disappointed.
-
-
It is another suggestion for a known to work solution -
Corsair appears to have better timing.
In reality, I doubt you would be able to tell the difference between the two. At 2133 Mhz, it's faster than what your CPU would support. Maybe integrated graphics would benefit, but if you are a gamer then getting discrete GPU would make the most sense. -
-
Can the Y500 even run that RAM at 2133 MHz? Maybe there are options in the unlocked BIOS, I never checked though because I never upgraded mine past DDR3-1600.
-
-
mainly depends on the strength of your cpu's memory controller
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk -
I'd say it depends more on your BIOS.
No problem with i7-4600m or i7-4700MQ
TomJGX likes this. -
sure, bios would be responsible for general stick compatibility. i was rather talking about clock speeds though...
-
I have a core i7 4870HQ
-
-
Is there a difference in Performance, if you get those 2133Mhz sticks in Single or Dual Rank? And the Quality of the DRam's (Samsung)? Do you guys know how much improvement you would get swapping the old 1600Mhz sticks for new 2133Mhz ones? Let's say in benchmarking (Firestrike) and real world?
I am considering getting two of those ones:
http://www.kmcomputer.de/shopware.php?sViewport=detail&sArticle=34915 -
-
rule of thumb: its best to only upgrade ram once uve already maxxed out everything else in your system, since its gonna give you the least real life performance boost.
that being said, i can state that ive gotten a noticeable boost in overall system snappiness when i upgraded from 1333 to 2133 Mhz. ull also notice this boost in specific benchmarks (intel xtu / cinebench / 3dmark not so much, but still there)
general benchmarks / games / applications will perform around 1-5% better with a significant ram speed upgrade, with specialized apps (rendering / sciency physics, math, whatever calculations) getting a more significant boost in performance.
to sum it up: a large jump in ram speed will give you performance bumps, but its nothing to write home about, so dont expect anything life changingadd to that the greatly diminishing returns once u go with faster and faster ram. best example for this is ddr4 with skylake, where u wont see ANY improvements whatsoever starting from 2666 Mhz, and even up to that its not really anything earth-shattering and mostly only noticeable in benchmarks, but not in real-life applications.
the quality of the DRAMs, as you put it, would only be interesting if youre planning to overclock the sticks, otherwise just go with whatever is cheapest at that pricing point
single vs. dual rank - if ure talking about single / dual channel, then by all means dual channel! thats one point where ull see huge performance increases / decreases, also in games! however, if youre talking about memory chip placement on the sticks themselves, then thats also nothing too significant to worry about
cheersCaerCadarn likes this. -
jaybee83 summed it up pretty well. Performance improvement is minuscule with faster RAM. Even tighter timings. RAM is just not the bottleneck in most cases. Even single vs dual channel you won't notice it much in games. Although I'd highly recommend dual channel if you can. Going from 1333MHz to 2400MHz would show relevant performance improvements, but usually in that case the CPU and rest of system are also much faster than one running only 1333MHz.
-
1866 may give a slight boost to system snappiness over 1600 especially in edge cases, but beyond 1866 it's mostly useless.
Now with that being said, faster ram can improve your gaming experience ever so slightly in certain games. No it won't magically boost the average FPS, but it can make a difference in min FPS, which I'd argue in a way is more important since higher minimums means you feel less frame drops. That review used an overclocked 4770K and overclocked 780 Ti, which is much more powerful than the specs for your Y500, so it may not apply here. But I just wanted to highlight this point regardless.
Also yes 2133 sticks can be OC'd to 2400, as I have personally done so myself, although it was purely for benchmarking purposes and offered no tangible improvement whatsoever for my uses.CaerCadarn likes this. -
I'll expand here too. Very few games benefit from higher speeds of RAM, and very few programs benefit as much too.
I'd say the only game I know of that REALLY likes higher speeds is Battlefield 4, and the only other scenario I know of where 2133MHz RAM or higher helps is in x264 live encoding. I suppose it'd help for regular encoding too, like with Sony Vegas or Handbrake... but it won't make much difference, as with live encoding managing CPU power is key.
1866MHz with decent timing is all you need otherwise if you don't care about those edge cases.
Of course I'm D2 and I want 2133MHz myself =D. But you probably are not me (and if you are, I feel very sorry for you)CaerCadarn likes this. -
Ha ha!
It's more like an Investment for whatever the future might bring. I'm also curious to see how much the difference in snappiness and benchmarking is by swapping 1600 sticks to 2133mhz and above.
I'm still in the process of learning and want to start oc'ing my rig soon. Could be that my rig ends up in a mushroom cloud! -
@D2 Ultima: Out of curiosity and a lil' bit off Topic, but what are your results in Firestrike (stock and/or oc'ed) with your rig? Beside the CPU we have very much similar specs.
Would be interesting to know! -
-
-
-
Thank you anyway for sharing! I'll come back later. -
but in all seriousness: timings are overrated with RAM, most important thing are clocks, followed by timings...
nice overview on DDR3-scaling on haswell: http://www.anandtech.com/show/7364/memory-scaling-on-haswell/10
so according to this, 2400 CL9 or 2666 CL10 would be the sweet spot for performance
and your can also see that 2133 CL11 is faster than 1600 CL9CaerCadarn likes this. -
Now THAT's really great stuff! Much appreciated!
Gives me more understanding how to tinker with and what to gain from it. -
Did you also achieve a higher result in the graphics score? -
I will use your OC-Guide and see what I can squeeze out of my rig. BTW, great work and all the others which threw in their 2Cents!!!jaybee83 likes this. -
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk -
-
Back on Topic: Will try oc'ing my rig with the new Kingston 2133Mhz Sticks and see how far I can go. To reach 1100Mhz level you have to overvolt properly I guess? -
You may not need to overvolt for the kingston sticks. -
i think he was referring to gpu core clocks ^^
-
Indeed I was!
Still to learn so much....
-
CaerCadarn likes this.
-
Also, my system is pretty much maxed out
GTX 980Ti
core i7 4870HQ
2x 500GB M.2 Samsung Evo 850 in Raid 0
Coolaboratory liquid Ultra
5 TB Toshiba 7200RPM HDD
2x1440p Acer monitorsTomJGX and CaerCadarn like this. -
980Ti eGPU?
-
-
ah, ok
-
-
Hi guys!
Can someone please leave his/her 2 Cents on this? Got my Kingston HyperX (4x4GB) 2133Mhz for my rig. Thought to just activate the XMP-Profile in (Prema) Bios to let them run in 2133Mhz. But this Feature is greyed out in Bios. So I set the latencies manually and saved it. So far so good! After restart my rig ran fine in 2133Mhz. Benches and testing went fine BUT after a cold restart Settings in BIOS were on "Auto" again, which means 9-9-9-26 1600Mhz.
Tried it several times! As Long as the rig is running life's good. As soon as I restart it, Settings are switched back to 1600Mhz. It is said, that Sandy-E officially supports only till 1600Mhz. But I found many threads were 2133Mhz was running fine without Problems, which it does! If it wouldn't switch back after restart....
So what's behind after this I wonder? -
have u tried using xtu instead of bios to set the ram speed and timings? xtu starts up at boot and automatically sets the profile thats been active in the previous session. if it still doesnt stick by saying smth like "an unexpected error has occurred" then its most likely either ur mobo or the cpu imc thats unstable. in that scenario u could still overvolt the system agent and analog/digital IO via bios or xtu to get the speed & timings stable. also use tools like memtest or occt large data set to check and see if those settings really are stable, in normal operation it sometikes takes quite a while until instabilities show up!
Sent from my Nexus 5 using TapatalkLast edited: Oct 9, 2015CaerCadarn likes this. -
2133Mhz Laptop RAM
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by seamon, Aug 30, 2015.