The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    AMD Athlon X2 64 Help

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by BaerXIII, Mar 8, 2010.

  1. BaerXIII

    BaerXIII Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hello everyone. My question is I am using AMD Athlon Dual-Core QL-64 which is dual-core at 2.1ghz each core as I read in a benchmark utility and a Windows 7 utility also I believe (Windows 7 is also my current operating on the system). But when I went to canyourunit.com and another source which is escaping my mind as of this moment it says it's running at 3.36ghz. Now in my mind and I could be wrong it should be running at 4.2ghz or at least in the high 3.X ghz. I'm just curious is if this is normal or if something is wrong. Much thanks for all help. If there is anymore information I should provide let me know.

    System: Hp G60-324CA laptop
    OS: Windows 7
    Memory: 3gb
    Processor:AMD Athlon Dual-Core QL-64
     
  2. namaiki

    namaiki "basically rocks" Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    3,905
    Messages:
    6,116
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Download and run CPU-z and you will get your answer.

    Also, dual core does not necessarily equal 2x the performance.

    edit: my laptop's result - You Have: 2.39 GHz Performance Rated at: 4.063 GHz (You Have: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8600 @ 2.40GHz)

    It's their own whatever rating system.
     
  3. notyou

    notyou Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    652
    Messages:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    AMD's Cool 'n Quiet is probably running. This will downclock the CPU and if the software grabs the CPU speed at the wrong time (as it likely did here), it'll give you back the wrong number. As namaiki said, download CPUz and then put some load on your CPU to see if the CPU speed jumps up to 2.1GHz.
     
  4. BaerXIII

    BaerXIII Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I think it is running one processor at 2.1ghz and the other at 1.05ghz, at least I think that's what cpu-z is saying to me. But I think it's like this because there is a .175 voltage differential between core 1 and 2. Here are the validation results if they help http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1073129.
     
  5. naton

    naton Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    806
    Messages:
    2,044
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    A dual core cpu cocked @ 2.1Ghz is not necessary equa to sngle core @ 4.2Ghz.

    It is likely that canyourunit.com is not recognising your Athlon properly. I think that it is not even recognising it as a dual core. My guess is that canyourunit.com has not been undated since the days of the Pentium 4 and it is trying to match your Athlon to a P4.

    That said the Athlon QL64 is >>>>>> than a P4 @ 3.36Ghz ;)
     
  6. namaiki

    namaiki "basically rocks" Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    3,905
    Messages:
    6,116
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    216
    I don't see any mention of 1.05GHz there.
     
  7. naton

    naton Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    806
    Messages:
    2,044
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    canyourunit.com rating system seems to be just so and so
     
  8. weinter

    weinter /dev/null

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    2,798
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I will correct you :D
    You are right with regards to Intel Core 2 Duo Processor but unfortunately this is AMD Turion Griffin Core (K8L K8 design, K10 Power Plane).
    It has a NUMA architecture and separate power plane design so Core 0 is independent to Core 1.
     
  9. naton

    naton Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    806
    Messages:
    2,044
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Thanks. that's good to know (I updated my previous post).

    Question:
    Why are you saying unfortunately? I mean having this feature shorly will help reducing the power consumption, isn't it?
     
  10. weinter

    weinter /dev/null

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    2,798
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Yes it is suppose to do that.
    By letting each core ramp the frequency independently less power is supposed to be wasted but unfortunately I don't notice much power saving from this lousy chip :D.
     
  11. BaerXIII

    BaerXIII Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  12. weinter

    weinter /dev/null

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    2,798
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Right Click on the Core and select Core 1 to see what frequency Core 1 is running at.
    I recommend you to google K10STAT undervolting.
    QL has 2 P_states
    Pstate 0 = Full Frequency
    Pstate 1 = 50%