AMD's Massive Step Forward With Zen 2 And Vega 20 on 7nm
Hardware Unboxed
Published on Nov 6, 2018
AMD Previews EPYC ‘Rome’ Processor: Up to 64 Zen 2 Cores
by Anton Shilov on November 6, 2018 2:27 PM EST
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13561/amd-previews-epyc-rome-processor-up-to-64-zen-2-cores
AMD Unveils ‘Chiplet’ Design Approach: 7nm Zen 2 Cores Meet 14 nm I/O Die
by Anton Shilov on November 6, 2018 1:53 PM EST
https://www.anandtech.com/show/1356...n-approach-7nm-zen-2-cores-meets-14-nm-io-die
AMD’s 64-core Zen 2 CPU is a precursor to next-gen 7nm Ryzen
An Epyc look at Zen 2.
Paul Lilly an hour ago
https://www.pcgamer.com/amds-64-core-zen-2-cpu-is-a-precursor-to-next-gen-7nm-ryzen/
"...What exactly gets ported over to Ryzen, however, isn't known. From our vantage point, it seems like a single 8-core chiplet would be the best approach, but it depends (in part) on how many cores/threads AMD wants to push."
Amazon Web Services offers EC2 instances based on AMD Epyc CPUs
A huge win for AMD
November 07, 2018 By Paul Mah
https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/...ces-offers-ec2-instances-based-amd-epyc-cpus/
"“Our goal with Epyc is to reach the largest number of users possible. The cloud is the tip of that spear. We must be partnered with the number one cloud provider in the world,” Dr Lisa Su, AMD’s president and CEO, said at the event.
Matt Garman, the VP of Compute Services at AWS, added: ..."the new R5a and M5a will offer 10 percent savings on compute costs and will work with existing system images. " To switch, existing customers only need to relaunch their instance with the correct selection from either the AWS Management Console or AWS Command Line."
AWS News Blog
New Lower-Cost, AMD-Powered M5a and R5a EC2 Instances
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-lower-cost-amd-powered-ec2-instances/
-
-
-
They took all power savings and kept isoperformance, meaning they can do a 125W 32 core chip at the lower frequency compared to current gen Epyc, which is insane.
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalkhmscott likes this. -
Article from FORBES... I could use a bit of clarification
AMD Reveals First 7nm 'Zen 2' Processor Details: Faster, Higher Core Density And Lower Power
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antony...er-core-density-and-lower-power/#24f2344233f2
"AMD's Mark Papermaster spoke in detail about its new 7nm Zen 2 core and partnership with TMSC, which will be manufacturing it. From the outset, he claims a doubling of core density and halving of power consumption for the same performance, both potentially indicating that we'll see increased core counts in future from its CPUs. He also claimed that Zen 2 will offer a 1.2x performance boost in IPC over current Zen+-based CPUs helped along by using a second generation Infinity Fabric."
So, the slide refers to 1.2x performance increase on same power... but the article mentions that the papermaster said the 20% perf. increase relates to IPC (not frequency).
If that's accurate and the IPC has been increased by 20% (kudos to AMD)... then, we still don't know what kind of frequency increase we will see on 8c/16th parts... and what TDP AMD chose for them (whether they will keep some of them as they are or not).
Also, if AMD chooses to increase the number of cores in the consumer space (to stay ahead of Intel), 8c/16th might become the new 'baseline'... and could offer 45W-65W parts with unknown (As of yet) frequency increases. -
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk -
Besides, the article says that the papermaster says the 20% increase in performance comes from IPC itself (and there's also mention of frequency increases, but nothing has been said how much of an increase, or for which parts at which TDP ratings, etc.)... and AMD also said that it exceeded its own expectations on both clocks/frequency and IPC.
So I don't know whether the 20% performance increase just refers to IPC and same frequencies as before for double core parts, or are we going to see frequency increases too on CPU's whose cores were doubled.
Double the performance (from doubling cores) would require perfect scaling - we've seen that games (and some of industry software) can't intelligently/efficiently use so many cores and that performance can drop on CPU's with excessive number of cores.
Besides, its not like AMD doesn't have high core parts already.
The TR series from ryzen 1 could get shuffled into high end consumer space.
So, if AMD does that, and 8c/16th becomes the new baseline, we should see much higher frequencies on those parts (sans ones where cores were doubled?)
AMD in their presentation video of ROME said that the CPU is a prototype and that the clock speeds are not final (while performing at slightly faster level than 2xIntel Xeon's).
This is why I require clarification.
ROME is apparently a prototype at this stage and still doesn't have final clock speeds (but if AMD simply doubled its core count, and is still awaiting for final frequencies... which frequencies was it running at? Stock ones from TR2 32c/64th, or stock from EPYC Ryzen 1?). -
Now, when they say performance, they mean the added total performance, which includes IPC and frequency, not one or the other. Here is the video from AMD. Watch Papermaster's comments, then go to the last 20 minutes and watch the bench examples with Su coming back on stage.
Next is saying games. This was an enterprise/server showing, NOT FOR GAMERS!!! The software they showed SCALES WITH CORES. You are mistakenly looking at improper use cases and should wait until I finish my article and farm it out to be a contributor.
Edit:
Now, if you can find the time stamp of where Papermaster said that 25% was coming from IPC, rather than just more powerful IPC, maybe I missed it, but I doubt it. Also, notice the parentheticals saying "same performance" and "same power." That is the curve I have lectured about at length.
You have a little bit on scaling, but scaling is already in the mix when you talk performance overall, not composite pieces.Last edited: Nov 8, 2018 -
It looks like the stated performance increase IS for IPC... not clocks and IPC:
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/amd-zen2-ipc-has-29-percent-higher-ipc.html
https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-c...than-Zen-1-in-certain-workloads.359556.0.html
It appears that there's been some confusion before, but AMD apparently clarified that they meant IPC increases (not frequency).
And besides, nothing was apparently stated of frequencies as of yet (not officially anyway)... plus AMD said in the primary video that the ROME design is a prototype and that frequencies aren't final.
So, I guess we still have some waiting to do for confirmation on final say what the clock frequencies will be.hmscott likes this. -
This means, as I told you, Forbes was wrong and you were wrong to say it was in the presentation. It was found in FN1 of the press release from AMD, not found in the presentation. It is in one very specific workload, not all workloads. So do NOT expect 29% IPC in ALL workloads. That builds up AMD for failure when Intel fanboys say it didn't do 29% in integer based workloads. Don't fall for the trap.
Sent from my SM-G900P using TapatalkLast edited: Nov 12, 2018 -
PC Perspective Podcast #521 - Zen 2, 7nm Vega, and SSD Vulnerabilities
PC Perspective
0:56:00 Meet the AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 and MI50 accelerators
1:04:25 AMD Shows Off Zen 2-Based EPYC "Rome" Server Processor -
It looks like the end results will not be the all inspiring Intel killer originally though of. While it will be better than 12nm I think they are bracing us for the worse. 7nm looks to be just a slight incremental improvement now that Moore's law is dead. The original thought seemed to be 7nm was going to be at least a 15% to 20% improvement over intel's 14nm but I do not think this any longer to be the case.
I think this is actually a good thing. having slightly faster products than the competition will raise demand on the CPU's slowly. Hopefully avoiding not being able to meet that demand. If Ryzen were to suddenly make Intel products antiquated it could cause supply issues. This especially as Intel may be a year or more before it can even start to answer.
AMD is also now in the position that is may soon be able to hold some things up its sleeve to release to compete instead of visa versa. I do not doubt one day Intel may regain the CPU crown, if it is lost, but since AMD is planning the as a slow and long lasting process you can expect this to be a drawn out fight. -
AMD’s David Wang: We Won’t Implement DirectX RayTracing (DXR) In Games Until Its Offered In All (Gaming) Product Ranges
By Usman Pirzada, 11 hours ago
https://wccftech.com/amds-david-wan...-dxr-until-its-offered-in-all-product-ranges/
"Japanese gaming site 4Gamer has managed to get a scoop from AMD’s David Wang (Senior Vice President of Engineering for Radeon Technologies Group) about the company’s plans to support DXR or DirectX Raytracing in games.
“For the time being, AMD will definitely respond to Direct Raytracing,” for the moment we will focus on promoting the speed-up of offline CG production environments centered on AMD’s Radeon ProRender, which is offered free of charge ….. utilization of ray tracing games will not proceed unless we can offer ray tracing in all product ranges from low end to high end,”
– David Wang, AMD in an interview to 4Gamer"
AMD Speaks Out Regarding Their Support For DXR Real Time Ray Tracing In Games
WccftechTV
Published on Nov 12, 2018
Japanese gaming site 4Gamer has managed to get a scoop from AMD’s David Wang (Senior Vice President of Engineering for Radeon Technologies Group) about the company’s plans to support DXR or DirectX RayTracing in games.
-
Naples, Rome, Milan, Zen 4: An Interview with AMD CTO, Mark Papermaster
by Ian Cutress on November 12, 2018 9:15 AM EST
https://www.anandtech.com/show/1357...-4-an-interview-with-amd-cto-mark-papermasterajc9988 likes this. -
AMD Radeon RX 590 final specs, pricing and performance
Published: 13th Nov 2018, 18:22 GMT
https://videocardz.com/79007/amd-radeon-rx-590-final-specs-pricing-and-performance
" AMD Radeon RX 590 to cost 279 USD
Let’s start with the most important piece of information. The official MSRP for Radeon RX 590 is 279 USD. This is a suggested price for nonexisting reference model (I mean there is a slide with a reference design, but I’m pretty sure it won’t be available). That said, the 279 USD price tag is likely just a starting point.
The price of RX 590 is therefore 40 USD higher than RX 480 at launch and 50 USD higher than RX 580 at launch (we are talking about 8GB models here).
It is important to note that Radeon RX 590 will be offered with a ‘blockbuster launch bundle’, with three ‘free’ titles included: Devil May Cry 5 (unreleased) The Division 2 and Resident Evil 2 (unreleased).
The presentation has many references to AMD ecosystem, especially FreeSync monitors. AMD is advertising their GPU+display solution as ~200 USD cheaper than competitions’.
RX 590: 12% better performance vs RX 580
Thanks to refined Polaris architecture now utilizing 12nm fabrication process, AMD has managed to squeeze 12% more performance and 15% higher clock speeds out of Polaris silicon. These are official figures straight from the slide.
The following tests were conducted with: Intel i7 7700K, 16GB DDR4 3000 MHz, AMD Driver 18.40, Windows 10. AMD also used GeForce 416.34 and 399.24 driver in various tests. The footnotes have more details, including 3DMark results, which I added below.
All tests were performed at a 1080p resolution with ‘maximum settings’.
Remember these are official tests performed by AMD employees. Independent reviews will be available on November 15th:
-
The extra performance is a good reason to buy new rather than a used 580 at these price points.
hmscott likes this. -
Why I Sold My Vega 64 For an RX 580
FocusTripp
Published on Jun 10, 2018
Pretty simple, it works better for my current situation and I don't lose as much value in it as I would with a Vega 64. also, it's quiet.
Crossfire RX 580's = 1080ti performance?!...well kind of
Timmy Joe PC Tech
Published on Nov 14, 2018
Should you buy an extra RX 580 in 2018 to try to achieve those next generation performance numbers? With the almost best case scenario system, we explore RX 580 crossfire and it's short comings in 2018!
Crossfire compatibility list: http://amdcrossfire.wikia.com/wiki/Crossfire_Game_Compatibility_List
Last edited: Nov 14, 2018 -
https://wccftech.com/amd-epyc-rome-64-core-7nm-flagship-cpu-clocks-2-35-ghz/
Well, cats out of the bag! I calculated that speed from the all core boost of the 7601 Epyc chips, which the zen 2 doubled performance and an IPC of 13% was expected, so I reduced the speed by 13%. That would seem to be base clock, so boost of the 64 core chip will be even higher, adding more performance. If my headaches didn't get in the way of finishing that article, I would have looked awesome at that revelation in a slide deck from HPE.
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalkhmscott likes this. -
Raise the Game - Fully Loaded
https://www.amd.com/en/gaming/raise-the-game
AMD Sapphire Nitro+ RX590 Review - Its a CRACKING card !
KitGuruTech
Published on Nov 15, 2018
Click to Jump to Benchmarks @ 08:55
Today AMD launch their new RX590 - and its actually a pretty good value for money proposition with this Sapphire Nitro+ RX590 version hitting retail around £260 in the UK via Overclockers UK.
Read the full review over on www.kiguru.net HERE: http://bit.ly/2Prs81D
RX 590 vs RX 580 vs GTX 1060 | Games of 2018 SHOWDOWN
Joker Productions
Published on Nov 15, 2018
Click to Jump to Benchmarks @ 02:04
Benchmarking the NEW AMD RX 590 vs RX 580 vs GTX 1060 from NVIDIA in the best PC Games of 2018 showdown for the best GPU under $300.
Hardware Unboxed
Published on Nov 15, 2018
Click to Jump to Benchmarks @ 03:20
HardwareCanucks
Published on Nov 15, 2018
The AMD Radeon RX590 is a "new" GPU that's based on old technology. But our performance benchmarks may tell a different story when the RX590 is compared against the RX580 and GTX 1060 6GB.
Gamers Nexus
Published on Nov 15, 2018
We critique an AMD RX 590 by XFX, the 'Fatboy,' and discuss odd thermal design choices for the new RX 590 GPU. The GPU performance will be tested later.
Last edited: Nov 15, 2018ajc9988 likes this. -
Is Vega 20 Worth it for MacBook Pro? Benchmarks & Thermals
Max Yuryev
Published on Nov 20, 2018
My Vega 20 MacBook Pro has been delivered! Let's benchmark it in Geekbench 4, Cinebench, and test thermal throttling!
The MacBook I'm Testing:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1444825-REG/apple_z0v1_mr9477_bh_15_4_macbook_pro_with.html
http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...h-gen-intel-cpus.821041/page-11#post-10822873 -
Ditching Ryzen 7 for Threadripper 2950X Editing Rig Upgrade & System Build
Hardware Unboxed
Published on Nov 20, 2018
Massive Encoding Gains, Threadripper 2950X Editing Rig Upgrade & System Build
ajc9988 likes this. -
Looks like AMD laptops need to be avoided. Terrible driver supoort a.k.a. no driver updates or fixes since launch. Lot of users complaining and having issues. They had a great opportunity it seems with their APUs but failed miserably. -
yrekabakery Notebook Virtuoso
bennyg likes this. -
Hardware Unboxed news corner: AMD botched Ryzen mobile drivers? (More info about AMD's plans, we might see drivers delivered on their website in the future)
Submitted 16 hours ago by Gynther477
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/9znjzz/hardware_unboxed_news_corner_amd_botched_ryzen/
DemonicDustBunny 63 points 15 hours ago
"tldw; AMD is apparently working to have a downloadable drivers for Ryzen Mobile from amd.com, just like normal drivers. Those two annually drivers from OEM partners are supposed to be a go-to stable drivers in case something went bad with newer, generic drivers.
But AMD ****ed up the statement and the ****storm began.
There are also some issues to fix like with OEM/Windows Update when a newer generic driver from amd.com is updated with OEM/Windows Update one."
WE *probably* DID IT GUYS!
Submitted 14 hours ago by Dan6erbond
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/9zo10l/we_probably_did_it_guys/
"As /u/Gynther477 already posted an hour ago. It seems that AMD has taken note of all our complaining and tweets because Hardware Unboxed released a video a few hours ago basically saying that AMD will focus on driver support starting 2019
We should be able to download the drivers straight from their website as we wanted, in addition to getting more "stable" drivers from the OEMs twice a year. Of course, none of this is confirmed to happen in early-2019, I can imagine it happening closer to the end of the year but I'm glad that we're finally being taken seriously and hopefully we'll be in a better situation a few months from now.
It also seems that AMD does have the necessary power in the mobile market to do what we demanded and these issues really were caused by their incompetence to do this in the first place which is sad because it means that all of this shouldn't have been necessary, because even though Ryzen is new to the mobile market, AMD isn't and the A-Series chips didn't have nearly as many issues and impact on the community as Ryzen Mobile did.
This obviously means that I won't be making posts as often and none of them will be "ranting" about the issue anymore, although I will be making occasional posts to make sure AMD doesn't think we forgot the situation and will keep on tweeting at them for the attention ;D.
Thanks to everyone that posted, commented, made videos about the issue or supported in any other way - be it with a simple upvote or the Reddit Platinum reward from /u/brokemyacct and the others. We have done it and proved once again that the community is just as important as a product and it's support. If it weren't for the AMD subreddit, we would still be dealing with this issues in a year from now, possibly even with the 3rd-generation of Ryzen and the H-Series, which would suck, so thanks to absolutely everyone that joined in on this crusade!
EDIT: In case anyone is interested in all of what happened on reddit with these issues, take a look at this post.
EDIT1: Guru3D, TechPowerUp and Hexus reported about this as well.
EDIT2: More reports from Tom's Hardware, Hot Hardware, SegmentNext and Computerbase have appeared."
No one will care about 3rd gen APUs and the H-Series if AMD doesn't take drivers seriously...
Submitted 2 days ago by Dan6erbond
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/9z35si/no_one_will_care_about_3rd_gen_apus_and_the/
"So I've posted quite a bit about the issues with Ryzen Mobile as it seems that AMD still hasn't started distributing drivers for Ryzen Mobile, even after more than a year since release and the appearance of over 30 unique devices running on those amazing Raven Ridge Mobile APUs.
Here's a quick overview of what I've done to grab AMD's attention:
- Previous Tweet at AMD, AMDRyzen, AMDGaming, LisaSu and HPSupport
- Latest Tweet at AMD, AMDRyzen, Radeon and LisaSu
- Most popular post about the issues
- Post AMD recognized about the issues
- Post on AMD Support Forums
I've also spent lots of time chatting with others that own Ryzen Mobile systems to clarify that this isn't an HP issue, so any of you who planned on downvoting this post and commenting that HP sucks at driver support can simmer down and remember that this post is about all the driver issues on Ryzen Mobile devices and not just those limited to HP systems.
Issues
Drivers
The latest drivers to be found for Ryzen Mobile on any website are those from the Windows Update Catalog dated to the 30. August 2018, and by downloading drivers from HP, Acer or any of the other major brands you usually get older drivers from July of this year, repackaged as drivers from August/September. The Radeon Software is outdated as well as version 17.7 is from July of last year and is very basic without much control over the CPU/GPU in games or programs. Even amazing features that have finally made it over to Raven Ridge Desktop haven't found their way to Mobile yet such as Radeon ReLive or the Radeon Overlay. Radeon ReLive luckily can be installed with a workaround, but it isn't what we want, because seemingly everything is possible with a workaround, such as installing newer drivers that aren't designed for the GPU but do work somewhat.
What's also interesting is that it seems downloading drivers from say Acer on to your HP device and then installing those with the workaround doesn't seem to make a difference at all. The stability barely changes, the performance too and usually features don't disappear or get added based on the OEM that distributed the driver, basically proving that OEMs don't even touch the drivers much and if they do, they all do the same changes like seemingly lower clocks as installing unofficial drivers (18.9.3 for example) on my system will give me higher clock speeds even without changing anything in the BIOS or power plan settings.
Now, I know that some people will and some people already have mentioned that Linux has great open-source drivers. I'm aware and I just want to say that this of course is a thread about the driver situation on Windows and I'm not interested in hearing about Linux every time I write something like this. I paid for Windows 10 Pro for a reason and that's because I want to use Windows 10 Pro, otherwise I could've ordered the FreeDOS variant of my device. I need Windows 10 Pro, want Windows 10 Pro and dislike Windows 10 Pro and there are many other reasons for not wanting to or not being capable to switch to Linux which is why this is an issue and switching to Linux isn't an answer.
Stability
Now all of that wouldn't be so bad if the systems at least ran stable. Especially the PRO variants found in devices like the HP EliteBook 755 G5 shine a terrible light on Ryzen Mobile because these devices (and the ThinkPad series) are marketed at enterprise users that require a little more GPU power than can be found in an Intel SoC and would be perfect for the use-case if it wasn't for their lackluster stability; from VLC crashing, Adobe Programs not recognizing the GPU all the way to the system showing multiple BSoDs an hour means that getting an Intel system is the better option for those who really need to get work done and can't upgrade to a 2'000+ CHF device. If GPU performance really matters, the only stable option is something like the EliteBook 1050 G1, Dell XPS 15 or a workstation for ridiculous amounts of money, which is terrible because not everyone (including myself) can afford a device like that.
Just from talking about these issues to other people I have found that a) I'm not the only one dealing with these issues and b) issues exist that I don't even have to deal with or others don't have to deal with:
- Ridiculous TDP limits (post by /u/MinecraftAddict131 explaining the problem a little better)
- VLC crashing in DX11 mode, not in OpenGL or other modes (comment/u/WillingMagic confirming that this isn't an HP-only issue, GIF displaying the issue)
- Adobe Programs not recognizing the GPU and thus I'm forced to use the software renderer (used to recognize it in the beginning, image to display the issue)
- Blender3D not recognizing the GPU (used to recognize it in the beginning as was Adobe Premiere Pro)
- DX11 (and other) games not allowing to change the resolution, sometimes even with stock drivers (comment /u/MynnyD confirming that this happens on his Lenovo ThinkPad E485 with any non-OEM drivers)
- Weird screen flickering when Vari-Bright is enabled (GIF to display the issue)
- Framedrops in games when Chill and Target Framerate Control are enabled
- Random crashing with BSODs often resulting in data loss (image displaying the issue)
- Crashing when installing workaround drivers (image displaying the issue)
- Can't change screen brightness with the F3/F4 keys, no option in the battery quick menu, have to go to the energy settings
/u/BadReligion even went as far as to contacting an HP Rep only to be disappointed by the fact that these HP employees like to point fingers at AMD when AMD points fingers at the OEMs for not updating the drivers as they should.
Especially the BSODs are annoying because of how common they are and usually result in data loss which means that I'm constantly saving files instead of focusing on writing them. As a programmer, spamming CTRL + S isn't as bad, but it's really freaking annoying to do this in literally every program and even on Reddit I've started using drafts.
Another interesting, and sad, thing is that most tech reviewers and tech journalists don't write about these issues even though some of them should know about these. Now either it means that they don't test enough or they're being paid to STFU, which sucks. The only reviewer I could find mention the issues is Solid State Tech that didn't a long-term real world review of the Envy x360 and mentions the issues in the middle of his video, but nothing to be found in the title or description about the issues. If reviewers and journalists would make people aware of the issues, less people would buy a product they don't want and AMD would get their **** together way quicker.
Performance
In addition to the lack of stability on some systems, it's clear that OEMs are "nerfing" the devices as I've done a lot of testing as well as others have to figure out pretty quickly that by simply installing "incompatible"/unofficial drivers like 18.10.1 can yield in major performance gains as this comment by /u/WillingMagicdisplays really well where someone benched his system with different drivers and also confirmed that his system is having issues with VLC even though he owns an Asus.
/u/MinecraftAddict131 also put in a lot of work to finding out that his Huawei Matebook - which I might add has one of the best implementation of Ryzen Mobile - could perform way better if it wasn't for these crippling factors that even Huawei implemented into their otherwise great system as he watercooled his device and explained in this post that removing the limits would give him way better (and expected) performance. He already went about bricking his system because of how "desperate" he is and I really think it's impressive how much work and trust people put into these AMD systems when all AMD - and the OEMs - do is disappoint us at seemingly every turn.
There are many others posts that display the issue and how unofficial drivers result in way better performance across all Ryzen Mobile systems such as this one from /u/bobzdar. Also /u/BadReligion (TechEpiphany) made some videos comparing the performance of the different drivers showing extremely well that drivers that aren't even designed for Vega Mobile perform better than those distributed by OEMs:
- Ryzen 7 2700 Review PUBG *new drivers!* awesome performance
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U driver comparison. 17.7 "Official" vs. 18.1.1 Wolfenstein II
- Far Cry 5 Ryzen 5 2500U Vega 8 "18.3.4" Driver Gameplay Benchmark iGPU
Now, I've seen /u/AMDOfficial's reponse to mainly my posts and it seems that they're just trying to pull some PR ******** by saying that they will "enable OEMs" to update their drivers twice a year. This sounds like the complete opposite of what we wanted as the first thing we wanted was more updates and secondly for those two come directly from AMD but with their statement they basically said that we'll be stuck with twice-annual updates that are as buggy as they are now and that AMD doesn't give enough ****s to distribute the reference drivers (that exist FFS!) on their website or they're being limited by some clause.
So, for you AMD PR people that seemingly can't read, here's what we want. Separated by line breaks to make it as easy as possible to read and bold in case you have a vision problem:
- Drivers for Ryzen Mobile coming straight from your website.
- Drivers for Ryzen Mobile as part of your regular driver packs.
- Future driver support for Ryzen Mobile (2-3 years at least!).
- Ryzen Master for Ryzen Mobile.
- More control over our hardware with Ryzen Master for Mobile.
- Drivers from the OEMs for those who want "optimized" drivers.
The point I want to bring over with this post is that if AMD doesn't take drivers seriously, no one will care how good the hardware of the upcoming (leaked) H-Series processors and 3rd gen Ryzen Mobile APUs will be if they don't update the current-gen's drivers. Ryzen Mobile was the same story, the very first laptop I remember seeing with Ryzen Mobile was the Lenovo IdeaPad and just seeing the Vega badge gave me a little hard-on. Then the first benchmarks rolled out and even though everyone knew that the idiots at Lenovo made a bunch of mistakes, those Vega iGPUs kicked intel's ass into the future and showed that an iGPU could keep up with current-gen dGPUs.
But in the end of the day, people still buy intel/nVidia systems even if they cost more and intel and nVidia are less pro-consumers because those systems just work and in terms of drivers intel and nVidia are actually more pro-consumer than AMD is.
The only thing AMD is doing that's really pro-consumer is making "pro" hardware available for the masses and not hiding products like Vega and Threadripper behind "pro" paywalls. And it does seem that their taking notice of what's going on with their recently made post and as this post shows, it seems that they have done some kind of "silent update" and quite possibly are working on Raven Ridge Mobile drivers meaning that there's a chance for us believers.
Update
It seems that AMD does read these posts as they responded to one of mine and made a thread about it that got massively upvoted, which is really sad because all in all they simply said that they don't care about their consumers and will make our situation worse by only enabling OEMs to release drivers every 6 months instead of every 3 months which is currently technically the case. You people need to understand that we don't want them to simply listen, we want to see change and we want to see drivers. Not some wimpy PR guy behind his desk trying to sooth us down. With their statement they also made it fairly clear that they don't plan on updating the drivers themselves and will just let the OEMs do whatever they want. Obviously I responded to that thread and the comment under my thread with an aggressive and a less aggressive response.
Also, my mainboard was replaced today, and as expected, nothing changed. VLC still crashes, the Radeon Settings are still outdated (obviously) and Adobe Programs still don't recognize my GPU for hardware acceleration. I haven't had a chance to check Blender3D or games yet, but this is enough to prove that we're dealing with driver issues, which is what I'll be telling the HP Support to make sure we either get new drivers (which won't happen) or I get a new system that works for free. It can't be that after all this time investment I still can't get my work done, which is important unlike the issues some are having with games which might be aggravating, but not vital.
Question
What drivers are you Ryzen Mobile users using and how's your experience with them been? I'm currently using the newest available from Windows Update which is dated to the 30.08.2018 which is honestly just... meh. Obviously it's more stable than those from AMD (18.10.2 etc.) which is why I'm using them, but the performance is lackluster and features like Adobe Mercury Render Engine - Hardware Acceleration don't work which is something I'm really pissed off about because it was one of my main requirements for my new laptop: HW acceleration, but now after the repair still isn't working and going to waste more of my time trying to convince HP that I need better drivers or a different device.
EDIT: Added paragraph about Linux not being an option for many of us even if the drivers are better, because it simply isn't the right solution for the most of us!
EDIT1: Just tweeted at AMD, AMDRyzen, Radeon and LisaSu!
EDIT: I heard that /u/amd_robert can make a change, we'd love to hear a statement from you Robert!
sillense 3 points 2 days ago
"i thought they [AMD] promised to deliver new driver every 3 months and now they say a twice-annual? wtf?"
The_Countess 10 points 2 days ago
"...AMD already gave them drivers to base their drivers on 4 times a year.
now AMD is going to push the OEM's to actually release drivers with those new drivers at least twice a year."
boanerges57 1 point 22 hours ago
"They [AMD] were pushing them out every 3 months allegedly. Oems werent using themLast edited: Nov 23, 2018 -
Acer Helios 500 (Ryzen is a Beast) Great Job Acer/AMD and May The Force Bless You!!!
Submitted 2 hours ago by Elizer0x0309
http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...zen-2-helios-500.817796/page-28#post-10824116
green9206 1 point an hour ago
"I thought you guys decided not to buy amd laptops anymore until they fix their drivers?""
revanchrists 3 points 41 minutes ago
"Helios 500 is a proper gaming laptop utilizing AMD Desktop CPU (1600/1700/2600/2700) + Nvidia/AMD Discrete GPU. It doesn't and won't suffer any of the dilemmas of current AMD APU lineups (the one with integrated GPU) because it doesn't need any iGPU drivers in the first place."
Elizer0x0309[ S] 1 point 41 minutes ago
"Thanks for that clarification"
Elizer0x0309[ S] 1 point 59 minutes ago
"Lol, I'm new here and to AMD." -
Best Motherboards for AMD Ryzen 2018 - AM4 X470 & B450
Gamers Nexus
Published on Nov 24, 2018
Buildzoid talks about the best motherboards for Ryzen, including categories for best under $120, $150, and $180, best OC, best ITX, and more.
BEST HIGH-END X470 OVERCLOCKING
Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 WIFI (Amazon) - http://geni.us/jwso20
BEST HIGH-END W/ 10Gb LAN
ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate (Amazon) - http://geni.us/WW8aNJ2
HONORABLE MENTION - EXTREME OC BOARD
ASUS X470 Crosshair VII Hero (Amazon) - http://geni.us/TtUK
BEST X470 MOTHERBOARDS UNDER $180
ASRock X470 Taichi (Amazon) - http://geni.us/K5AyNi
ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming (Amazon) - http://geni.us/BByjRf
(Honorable Mention Only) MSI X470 Gaming Pro Carbon (Amazon) - http://geni.us/zEXs
BEST AM4 MOTHERBOARDS UNDER $150
MSI X470 Gaming Plus (Amazon) - http://geni.us/MFsc
(Honorable Mention) Gigabyte X470 Aorus Ultra Gaming (Amazon) - http://geni.us/eFFpm
MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC (Amazon) - http://geni.us/A144F
BEST AM4 MOTHERBOARDS UNDER $120
MSI B450 Tomahawk (Amazon) - http://geni.us/uIi9
BEST B450 MICRO-ATX MOTHERBOARDS UNDER $100
MSI B450M Mortar (Amazon) - http://geni.us/lXDYXU
(Honorable Mention) ASUS TUF B450M-Pro Gaming
BEST Mini-ITX AM4 MOTHERBOARDS
MSI B450I Gaming Plus AC (Amazon) - http://geni.us/B7Hdcf
Gigabyte B450I Aorus Pro WiFi (Newegg) - http://geni.us/MWoqlTv
Find Buildzoid here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrwO...
RX 590 XOC - with Dry Ice to 2 GHz?
der8auer
Published on Nov 18, 2018
RX 590 Overclocking Guide/Tutorial - How To Overclock an RX 590 To 1600 Mhz Core + 9 Gbps Memory
TheFullSetup
Published on Nov 24, 2018
In Today's video I will be showing you how to overclock an RX 590 to 1650mhz core and 9Gbps memory with Msi Afterburner. 1650 mhz is not guaranteed so I will also be showing you how to achieve 1600mhz and 1625 mhz boost. The graphics card i am using to day is the AMD RX 590 Sapphire Nitro+ 8gb 1560mhz edition. As always please post your overclocking score including core, memory and voltage tweaks.
Last edited: Dec 14, 2018ajc9988 likes this. -
ajc9988 likes this.
-
But I would have expected that their mobile drivers would have been available off their own website (and not rely on OEM's for new driver releases - as OEM's are notoriously reliable for dropping support early on).
I was fortunate with GL702ZC because the hardware is desktop based... so drivers from AMD's own website work great, but for mobile APU's.... its a huge problem. -
AMD lol. Wow. Labeling an RX 570 as an RX 580. Although not at all surprising after they did the exact same thing with the RX560 awhile back.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/324...ietly-radeon-rx-560-graphics-cards-worse.htmlLast edited: Nov 26, 2018 -
How Well Does 128 GB of DDR4 Work On Threadripper?
Level1Techs
Published on Nov 22, 2018
https://forum.level1techs.com/t/mem...-128gb-2933-ecc-tested-level-one-techs/133494
https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1811207-FO-1811187SK17
Last edited: Nov 26, 2018ajc9988 likes this. -
Zen 2 - the Next HoRyzen
AdoredTV
Published on Nov 16, 2018
Some brainstorming on what we might get with the next Ryzen release.
-
Vega 64 Definitive Undervolt/Overclock Guide - For all the new owners
Submitted 12 hours ago by mx5klein
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/a17lp7/vega_64_definitive_undervoltoverclock_guide_for/
"With all the new vega 64 owners on here since the price drop and everyone looking for information on the undervolt/overclock process I feel that an updated and more accurate guide was needed since when I researched mine a few months ago I ran into a lot of misinformation. This guide is the result of hours of tinkering and working to get the best compromise of powerdraw/noise to performance. If you just got your new vega 64 here is what you need to do to make it perform great.
Using wattman set a +50% power limit then drop your voltages on p6 to 1000mv and p7 to 1100mv. These can be fine tuned later if you want, but voltages around this provide the best performance in my experience with vega’s boost algorithm.
Start off low for clocks p6 around 1450mhz and p7 around 1550mhz then slowly bring them up (mine is stable with p6 at 1557 and p7 at 1642 but it’s better to start too low) -Too high of a core clock will cause a driver/system crash.
Use 3d mark or heaven to test stability quickly, when you are done and test in games you may find yourself lowering your clocks a little to make it completely stable.
Overclock the hbm as high as you can (mine is completely stable at 1100mhz and benchmark stable at 1150 for reference) -Too high and this will cause artifacting in games
Set the hbm voltage to lower than your p6 voltage as it is the voltage floor of the core. The hbm voltage is hard coded into the bios and this setting doesn’t effect it.
If your on a reference cooler you should be able to keep the fan max speed at around 2500-2700rpm without any throttling. This depends on your case's airflow so keep an eye on temps and the average clock speed while running.
The stock temp limit and targets shouldn’t be messed with.
For reference my card gets a graphics score just above 26000 in firestrike, you should be able to get close to that or beat it depending on the silicon lottery.
Make sure to save the profile with proper file names in case something happens and the driver crashes, if you don’t you will lose your setting in the event of a crash. Keeping proper file names will help you keep track of the most recent revision of your settings.
Edit: Added heaven for another good stability testing benchmark."Last edited: Nov 28, 2018 -
The 7nm War of 2019
Coreteks
Published on Nov 28, 2018
In this video I discuss the plans of the three tech giants for 2019, with an emphasis on predicting how AMD's 3000 series Ryzen cpus will look like.
High-End Navi Confirmed...sort of
Coreteks
Published on Nov 19, 2018
Someone in the Industry contacted me with some information regarding Navi. In this video I'll discuss the upcoming AMD Navi GPUs for 2019
-
Speculations galore. My concern is for late Q1 or early Q2 launch of Zen-3. This late in the game usually a firm layout of the chip has been selected but even AMD admits to several layout possibilities. I would feel more confident if a layout were planned and silicon were in Beta.
hmscott likes this. -
Instead, AMD is focused on the release and reception of the first 7nm product: Vega 20. So chill.
Sent from my SM-G900P using TapatalkLast edited: Nov 29, 2018 -
Zen-1 is all based on the basic layout of the CCX and multiples there of. Ie. Ryzen 1 CCX, TR 2 CCX and Epyc 4 CCX. while variations of stepping vary, the basic layout does not. This basic layout was set early on, here there does not seem to be a basic layout yet.
-
Taking a Look at the Sapphire Nitro+ RX 590
Level1Techs
Published on Nov 28, 2018
$279, $319, Google Shopping
Sapphire Radeon RX 590 Nitro+ review: The new 1080p gaming champion
Heavy metal, refined
By Brad Chacos, Senior Editor, PCWorld | NOV 28, 2018 3:09 AM PT
https://www.pcworld.com/article/3323380/components-graphics/sapphire-radeon-rx-590-nitro-review.html
Sapphire RX 590 Nitro+ review, misleading Optane PC specs, Black Friday hauls | The Full Nerd Ep. 76
PCWorld
Streamed live 72 minutes ago
Join The Full Nerd gang as they talk about the latest PC hardware topics. Today's show covers Brad's Sapphire RX 590 Nitro+ review, Gordon's article about misleading Intel Optane PC specs, and we all share our Black Friday hauls. As always we will be answering your live questions so speak up in the chat.
Last edited: Nov 29, 2018 -
Here, the layout isn't changing greatly, people's expectations and guesses on what the layout is are changing. Critical distinction, unless you have information I do not.
The 256MB L3 was known since Caanard PC tweeted it over 9 months ago. Now, you have all these stories confirming that and likely 4 core CCXs, destroying other guesses at 6 & 8 core CCXs. You have more theorizing on how the chips are tied together, what the silicon layout is, etc. So AMD is doing AMD. What you may be more upset with, which I find clever and a smart way to drive hype without hyping a product, is AMD withholding information to purposely being out the speculators to drive the conversation. They have given just enough information, drip feeding to the market, to allow people's imaginations to run wild. Sometimes a leak or a drip of information is even used to steer the conversation, to tamp down on fan base enthusiasm and manage expectations, etc. Other times, it is to drive the major advances seen through the revolutionary chiplet design. Not only are they using chiplets, they are catching up to Intel while doing it, when latencies, etc., made many in the mainstream dubious just a couple years back. Hence Intel using "glue" derisively.
So I respectfully disagree. I think this is more a case of not knowing enough about their new product at the moment rather than everything changing so greatly at the last minute.
For example, the leaks before sisoft showed some info, like IPC, but no frequency info. Sisoft confirmed the L3 amount. AMD confirmed speed gains are harder to come by and manage expectations on Zen 3. Sisoft showed 1.4/2.0 base/boost. They demoed the 64 core chip running 2.35GHz and HP leaked a slide saying 2.35GHz, suggesting the sisoft score was using earlier silicon. None of that information contradicts. It just suggests we are getting information in abstraction. We don't know which revisions of silicon the information correlates to, which silicon is older or newer, etc. If I didn't see more guidance by CES in January, then sure, time to worry. Until then, they are giving just enough to keep zen interesting, playing aloof enough to keep it interesting, and have a server card releasing between now and CES. I'm hoping CES is the paper release of Rome, couple months later, release Ryzen. Then, drop Rome in volume and variation at CES, followed by TR3 in August. I also wish the APUs were not running behind by a year, but 2019 to 2020, of waiting to do 7nm Navi with a 7nm zen2 or zen3 with 7nm+ would be perfectly fine with me (although I'm not currently in the market for an APU).
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk -
Microsoft will reportedly release a Surface Studio monitor in 2020
By Tom Warren@tomwarren Nov 29, 2018, 10:00am EST
https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/29...rface-studio-monitor-2020-release-date-rumors
"...Sams also hints at a growing frustration between Microsoft and Intel. Like other PC makers, Microsoft is waiting on Intel to finally ship its 10nm processors.
Intel’s new chips are supposed to launch in 2019, despite rumors they’ve been canceled. Microsoft could be looking to AMD as an alternative, as Sams notes an AMD-based Surface Laptop could be released in late 2019. Microsoft is reportedly considering using AMD Picasso chips.
If Microsoft does move to AMD chips, this would be a big warning sign for Intel. Intel reportedly convinced Microsoft not to choose ARM for Surface Go, and it’s now facing strong competition from AMD for desktops and laptops. 2019 is going to be an interesting year for Surface and Intel."
Microsoft's Next Surface Laptop May Be AMD-Based
by Scharon Harding November 29, 2018 at 9:20 AM
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/microsoft-surface-laptop-amd-cpu,38176.html -
-
AMD Athlon 200GE Overclocking, The Best Budget CPU Just Got Better!
Hardware Unboxed
Published on Dec 2, 2018
AMD Athlon 200GE Review & 3.9GHz Overclocking | Budget Gaming CPU
Gamers Nexus
Published on Dec 2, 2018
We overclocked the AMD Athlon 200GE to 3.9GHz on the MSI B350 Tomahawk, then reviewed the CPU when in use with a discrete GPU.
Article: https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews...
The AMD Athlon 200GE CPU is an "APU," technically, in that it has an integrated, ultra low-end graphics solution on-die. Taking up die space means a weaker CPU component, but some additional versatility as a standalone part. This makes it a weaker R3 2200G, but similar in basic concept. What we wanted to know was if the AMD Athlon 200GE could replace the old G3258 or G4560 in market position: A cheap CPU for for pairing with a cheap dGPU, creating a combo below the R5 2400G in price, but above it in performance. The R3 2200G earned our Best Budget Gaming award a few weeks ago, and it still holds that, but a cheap CPU and dGPU combo would outperform the 2200G, in theory, it's just that cheap CPUs haven't really been good lately. The Pentium line is too expensive with the 14nm shortage, leaving us with the relatively new 200GE for review. In the process of working on the review, we learned that the 200GE overclocks with MSI boards and AGESA 1.0.0.6, something we explored in this benchmark.
-
-
Here is another dealing with leaks (so salt shakers) on the upcoming zen 3 chips.
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalkhmscott likes this. -
based on his analysis of the 2 rumour being very similar, thats his take on it. "what are the chances of 2 rumours being similar" has issues because 1. if the 2nd rumour and 1st rumour were from the same source given to two different individuals then it could happen. 2. 2nd rumour being based off of 1st rumour with more in depth analysis would be another entire plausible scenario.
anyway, i think its to good to be true, but zen 2 still looking good regardlessajc9988 likes this. -
Now, the heat density is the question, although the I/O die allows spreading out the heat a bit. The binning of I/O and use on GPUs I find most interesting. By spreading it to more products, if the DDR sucked, but HBM or GDDR controllers were good, you just match it to the appropriate product. Also, the I/O chip makes it a single NUMA node, which is why they said they weren't doing multi-die consumer GPUs. Using this implementation may open up possibilities on future cards. It also explains use of infinity fabric to connect GPU to GPU. And moving I/O off die means you reduce size of the GPU die significantly, helping with yields, all while not having to shrink I/O which gives less gains in performance.
It also opens up possibilities of using HBM or another on-package ram technology with DDR, thereby making the on-package ram a large L4 for use in super computing on down (not this gen, but think ground work).
So, official support for 3200MHz ram makes sense, using on GPU makes sense, and introducing a CPU and GPU connected to the same I/O controller and using that I/O controller across all products makes sense.
Also timing ahead of Intel's architecture day on Dec. 11 seems a tit-for-tat to take the wind out of Intel's sails, along with making 14nm+++ 10-core released next fall look too little, too late, and very hot and power hungry.
Pricing seems low, but if they moved I/O off die helping with yields, plus doing speed binning of chips to pick best product to use for integration, it makes a lot more sense. Either way, one month until CES. If it is anywhere near confirmed, this really will be a kick to Intel's nuts while down!
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalkhmscott likes this. -
ajc9988 likes this.
-
Let's hope laptop MFRS get on the desktop chips in laptops.
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalkhmscott likes this. -
This is an unseen effect for Intel. While it was known that eventually to upgrade an Intel system the platform may have to as well, be it socket, chipset etc.. Problem now for them is it also forces the consumer whether to stay with Intel or move on to AMD. Zen-2 may make this a more tempting option to move on. Once AMD has the new consumers with the easy upgradability it will be a hard sell for Intel to get them back.
-
jim from adore also mentioned that intel produces these chips massively and theres supply and demand issue too, if AMD can't get enough chips out people might just go for intel and not wanting to spend extra time for AMD system.ajc9988 likes this. -
If single core boost hits high 4GHz up to 5GHz, the gaming performance should be up, especially with IPC, making things hard for Intel, which is talking a 10C 14nm product for mainstream. And that will run hot AF.
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
AMD's Ryzen CPUs (Ryzen/TR/Epyc) & Vega/Polaris/Navi GPUs
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Rage Set, Dec 14, 2016.