The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Best SSD nowadays

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by kevindd992002, Jul 9, 2011.

  1. kevindd992002

    kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    233
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Which is the best SSD drive that I can get nowadays? Stability and speed basis.
     
  2. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    Intel 320 Series 160GB and larger for SATA2 systems.

    Intel 510 Series 250GB for SATA3 systems.
     
  3. jackluo923

    jackluo923 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,038
    Messages:
    3,071
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    105
    intel 320 120gb is more bang for the buck but still just as fast. MSRP is about $1.75/gb
     
  4. Tsunade_Hime

    Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow

    Reputations:
    5,413
    Messages:
    10,711
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Best SSD? Depends on your budget. If the sky's the limit, Intel would be my choice.
     
  5. Peon

    Peon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    406
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Taking stability into account, I'd say Samsung 470 or Intel X25-M. Customer satisfaction in general is lower with the 320 and especially the 510.
     
  6. kevindd992002

    kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    233
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Hmmm, I thought the Intel 510 series weren't much faster than the 320?
     
  7. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    SATA II: Samsung 470 is faster than Intel 320 and has lower failure rate on Newegg.com.

    SATA III: Intel 510 or Crucial M4. Real world performance differences are tiny, I'd say go for the cheaper M4.

    Intel 510 is a bit faster. Think ~ 8% to 10% in real world usage.
     
  8. kevindd992002

    kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    233
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    But based on specs, the X-25M G2 is better in random performance than the 510, is this true?
     
  9. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    The random performance of Intel X-25m beats Intel 510 and 320.
     
  10. kevindd992002

    kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    233
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    What the?! Random performance is so important for everyday usage. What would be the selling point of an Intel 510 or Crucial M4 then?
     
  11. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Intel 510 beats Intel 320 in real world usage.

    Intel 320 beats Intel X25-m in most real world usage.

    Conclusion: random performance is important but it's not everything.

    And during day to day usage, it will be impossible to notice any difference between these drives without using a stopwatch.
     
  12. kevindd992002

    kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    233
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Ok. How about Corsair Force 3/GT, are those drives any good?
     
  13. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Performance is good. Reliability of Sandforce drives doesn't come close to Crucial, Samsung and Intel.

    Check Newegg.com reviews of the Force 3 or Agility 3 for many examples.
     
  14. kevindd992002

    kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    233
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Ah. How about capacity, would getting a 60GB version of one SSD sacrifice a significant amount of speed compared to getting the 120/250GB version of the same?
     
  15. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Yes, a lesser capacity SSD will always have lower performance, if all else is the same. Less channels due to less NAND means slower speeds.
     
  16. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Booting and launching applications will be virtually the same.

    Most installation performance will be the same too.

    File copying and heavier multi tasking will be faster on larger drives.
     
  17. kevindd992002

    kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    233
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Like how many seconds difference with file copying and multi tasking?
     
  18. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455