The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Better performance with less memory?!?!

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by jhenson, Feb 17, 2009.

  1. jhenson

    jhenson Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    In my windows experience score, I had a 4.9 for memory processes. One stick of memory then went bad so now I am running just one of the two original sticks. I refreshed the score and it got a 5.1! Can someone please explain this to me. I have a t61p notebook
     
  2. K-TRON

    K-TRON Hi, I'm Jimmy Diesel ^_^

    Reputations:
    4,412
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Dont worry about the WEI. It is a terrible benchmarking utility.
    If you want to see the actual memory performance download SIS Sandra. You can run the memory bandwidth test and it will tell you exactly how fast your memory is running.
    You can run the test with your original memory, and the replacement memory and you can tell if their is a difference by comparing the numbers.

    K-TRON
     
  3. fluffboy

    fluffboy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    wei is garbage enough said. Use Sis sanda as k-tron said.
     
  4. Tolkannn

    Tolkannn Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    WEI sucks duude you should use stuff like PCMark, 3DMark, HDTune..etc
     
  5. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    As above, WEI is a random number generator.
     
  6. scott.ager

    scott.ager Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    345
    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Less memory would seem to use less CPU housekeeping clock cycles doing all that bank switching and RAM refreshing at least on the surface to me...........
     
  7. Tippey764

    Tippey764 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    377
    Messages:
    1,423
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    the WEI in windows 7 isnt that bad.
     
  8. MadBoris

    MadBoris Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    But it will never be as good as third party tests, so what's the use in defending it really.

    Microsoft uses the minimalistic approach.
     
  9. nizzy1115

    nizzy1115 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,557
    Messages:
    6,682
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Its not really a random number generator, and its a lot better at a basic benchmark than people give it credit for.

    I can probably explain the differences in score - which you, in fact, almost said yourself. You said one stick went faulty, which would likely mean that it was slightly faulty before. This slightly faulty stick could have been providing the system with enough errors that it continually needed to relocate those blocks of data that it had sent to be stored on the bad stick. This would lower the ram score because it would make storing and retrieving data from them slower than if you had just removed it. Ram is more so based on how fast over how much (after you have a certain amount.)
     
  10. anothergeek

    anothergeek Equivocally Nerdy

    Reputations:
    668
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    WEI isn't a bad idea for the lesser computer minded though. Consumer gets number, consumer looks at software, does consumer meet the minimum? Ding! But for anyone who's made it this "far" (a computer site) it's probably useless for them :p