The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    C2Solo Su3500 faster than AMD Neo X2 L335

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by xScorp1on, Jun 13, 2010.

  1. xScorp1on

    xScorp1on Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    53
    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Is this possible? Right now I have two laptops, I'm trying to decide which one to return.

    Gateway EC1803u: 11.6" 1366x768, C2S SU3500 1.4ghz, 2gb DDR2, 4500MHD, Win 7 32-bit
    HP dm3z: 13.3" 1366x768, Neo x2 L335 1.6ghz, 4gb DDR2, Radeon 3200, Win 7 32-bit

    For testing I used a 1080p trailer of Avatar on youtube. I am playing using firefox with flash 10.1 (which includes hardware video acceleration). I found that the EC1803u plays nearly smooth video at 1080p full screen, while the dm3z plays it extremely choppy, esp during action.

    This defies common sense. The ec1803u is a solo core processor, clocked slower, with an onboard video chipset, with less ram. Both are running clean installs of windows 7.

    Windows PITS (Performance index) rates the HP at .5-1 points higher than the Gateway on every criteria.

    So why is the HP worse at playing HD youtube?

    (I know I installed 32-bit win7 on the hp, but that should only affect ram, which it has more of than the gateway. Not to mention I think 32-bit OSes should run faster)
     
  2. leslieann

    leslieann Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    830
    Messages:
    1,308
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I wouldn't say it defies common sense.

    I would imagine the Intel system has better optimization routines, being an Intel and yes, with 32bit it should run faster but probably not so much considering you weren't multitasking, and 2gigs was plenty (also you are looking at 3vs2, not 4vs2).

    You need a balanced system, and the Intel is well balanced, allowing each part to work to potential. The AMD CPU may be getting bled dry by the video card. Something people miss these days is that a powerful video card needs a powerful CPU to push it. I know people say GPU makes the real difference these days, and it does, but you still need the CPU. Years ago people would put the latest and greatest video card on a system expecting impressive results only to see the CPU grind to a halt just trying to feed the GPU. Desktops have gotten beyond that for the most part. North bridges have improved a lot taking some of the load cpu or maybe the CPU has gotten powerful enough for it to not be noticeable, but in lower powered CPU's you can probably still see the effect of it I would imagine.


    Couple other possible reasons,
    You may be only using one of the cores instead of both.
    How large is the cache on the AMD?
    Is ANYTHING else running in the background? Indexing?
    Does the Intel have hardware acceleration for that codec?
    Could you have a bad driver? Where did you get the drivers? Windows auto update? Those are to get you running, not necessarily be optimized or up to date.

    Don't underestimate onboard chipsets, they handle most common tasks quite well, it's gaming where they get clobbered.


    Last and most importantly, Mhz is a VERY poor way to judge a cpu's power. Which is probably the biggest mistake you made. An Atom 1.6 barely competes with an old Celeron 800. How does the Neo compare?




    Update: a quick search shows the processors are pretty evenly matched. So it's either optimizations, a problem (drivers?), or the video card dragging it down.
     
  3. ronnieb

    ronnieb Representing the Canucks

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    1,869
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    AMD processors are much more powerful than Intel's ULVs and Atom processors. The HD 3200 is an amazing IGP. It is one of the top IGP's for hardware acceleration for HD movies.
     
  4. xScorp1on

    xScorp1on Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    53
    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well, yes, if I had no background on the processors you could argue that Intel is normally better than AMD. However, I also did google the performances and they're about equal, at least, and so does Windows PITS.

    I got the HD3200 drivers straight from ati.com, so it should be fine.

    They're both fairly new installs, so I don't know what I could've installed that's sucking cycles in the background (especially to that effect). I can't imagine search indexing bringing it down that badly.
     
  5. Brawn

    Brawn The Awesome

    Reputations:
    145
    Messages:
    1,215
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    56
    ctr shift esc and check if anything using cpu
     
  6. xScorp1on

    xScorp1on Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    53
    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Main 2 processes are system idle and firefox
     
  7. H.A.L. 9000

    H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw

    Reputations:
    6,415
    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    552
    Trophy Points:
    281
    On the one with the AMD... After installing the AMD Catalyst drivers, when playing an HD video, right click on the video and make sure "Hardware Acceleration" is checked. Sometimes it isn't. Also, you are running the 10.1 GM?
     
  8. sean473

    sean473 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    6,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    its a driver problem for sure... the Dm3z should be a much better laptop...
     
  9. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    I wouldn't say the SU3500 is faster than the L335 (cause it's not).

    I'd say SU3500 & Intel 4500 handles Youtube acceleration better than the L335 & Ati 3200.

    Youtube (Flash) is probably the only thing the Intel combo does faster. I can't tell you why though.
     
  10. H.A.L. 9000

    H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw

    Reputations:
    6,415
    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    552
    Trophy Points:
    281
    Driver optimization for flash 10.1... IMO anyway.
     
  11. leslieann

    leslieann Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    830
    Messages:
    1,308
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Pure raw power doesn't always win.
    Optimizations can make a big difference in how things run.

    Intel has always been ahead of AMD in this department.
     
  12. xScorp1on

    xScorp1on Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    53
    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well, even if it doesn't have more power, this gives the Intel ULV combo an edge over the AMD combo in ters of ultraportables- this is the generation of netbooks and thus everything I do will be mostly on the internet, including video and music. If it can't handle flash properly then its lost its primary competition for me (watch HD flash video).

    I can't even watch hulu fullscreen... I can borderline do that on the gateway. Maybe I'll just find an intel dual core ulv then.
     
  13. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Exactly my thought. Good performance and very good battery life.

    I get over 8 real hours with my HP DM3 SU4100. L335 gets about half.
     
  14. ronnieb

    ronnieb Representing the Canucks

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    1,869
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Im pretty sure this is a single core processor so AMD does have the advantage, along with a much better IGP solution
     
  15. H.A.L. 9000

    H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw

    Reputations:
    6,415
    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    552
    Trophy Points:
    281
    By pure statistics. X4500 vs HD3200... theres really not that much difference, and only maybe slightly tilted in AMD's favor (gaming wise).
     
  16. sean473

    sean473 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    6,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    that's why i suggested middle ground of asus UL30JVT... it has G310M which is more than enough... and also has i5, i7 ULV CPU's with quite good battery life.. not sure about proce though..
     
  17. alex50

    alex50 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I am interested in picking up the Gateway and would love to hear your feedback on video playback performance. Are you able to playback 720p and 1080p mkv files without issues? How about other formats like DVD rips or mp4 files? I am essentially looking for a small travel machine that can do basic things like web/email, occasional remote desktop with the work machines and playback of hd video. I am hoping that this machine will meet those needs. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks.