The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    CPU comparison

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by dcmove, Jan 22, 2009.

  1. dcmove

    dcmove Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I'm about to buy a latitude E6500. I don't really game (maybe occasionally), but mainly use the computer for common personal use (email/web/photos/music/personal finance/etc.).

    Is there any benefit I'd see to get a CPU beyond the P8400? For example, there's a P8600. Is there a link to a comparison of all of these processors anywhere and will I see any noticeable differences in speed given my usage?
     
  2. Tinselworm

    Tinselworm Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,303
    Messages:
    1,307
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    not really worth it if you arent doing intensive stuff
     
  3. HerrKaputt

    HerrKaputt Elite Notebook User

    Reputations:
    444
    Messages:
    2,510
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Agreed. On a side note, Pxxxx processors draw less power than Txxxx processors, so make sure to choose a P processor to have more battery life and less fan noise.
     
  4. Big Mike

    Big Mike Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    57
    Messages:
    956
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    The only BIG step above a P8400 without leaving the P series power and heat savings would be the P9600 (6mb l2 cache vs 3 and about 400 more mhz) but frankly most people don't do things that require that much L2 cache where it would make a big difference, and the clock speed on the 8400 should be sufficient for any standard usage. Unless you're encoding or editing video, using photoshop with lots of filters, or something of that nature you really won't need it.
     
  5. dcmove

    dcmove Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Thanks, all! That's kind've what I was thinking, but good to hear validation of that.

    Is there a posting or a website that rank orders the speed of various processors (I've seen links in these forums to notebookcheck.net for GPU rankings, and was hoping there might be something similar for CPU rankings).
     
  6. Big Mike

    Big Mike Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    57
    Messages:
    956
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
  7. allfiredup

    allfiredup Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,482
    Messages:
    3,209
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    106
    If you're buying a new Latitude E6500, it's worth mentioning that the P8600 is normally a $50 upgrade from the P8400, but it's currently priced at just $10! For $10, it's worth it....go for the P8600!
     
  8. Snakecharmed

    Snakecharmed Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    298
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    For your stated uses, the cheapest CPU available would be the way to go as long as you have an upgrade path later (if you're a DIYer). All those items on your list don't come close to taxing a P8400 though. My desktop is still powered by an overclocked AMD Athlon XP that I installed three years ago and it still does a great job with the tasks you listed.

    If it costs $10 to step up to the P8600 though, you may as well go for it.