The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    CPU single thread performance history chart?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by HopelesslyFaithful, Feb 4, 2014.

  1. HopelesslyFaithful

    HopelesslyFaithful Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,552
    Messages:
    3,271
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have been looking at Notebookchecks database to see if i can get a feel of the improvements of single thread performance from nm-nm-nm for clock per clock and gen to gen. Has anyone seen a chart showing that? 65nm-45nm-32nm-22nm? I am interested in single thread only.

    Thanks HF
     
  2. octiceps

    octiceps Nimrod

    Reputations:
    3,147
    Messages:
    9,944
    Likes Received:
    4,194
    Trophy Points:
    431
    HopelesslyFaithful likes this.
  3. HopelesslyFaithful

    HopelesslyFaithful Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,552
    Messages:
    3,271
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i think notebookcheck has clock per clock but i figured someone has done a comparison of the history of the trend....it would surprise me if no one has. Thanks for the links i'll check them out tonight when i got time
     
  4. fatboyslimerr

    fatboyslimerr Alienware M15x Fanatic

    Reputations:
    241
    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    81
  5. HopelesslyFaithful

    HopelesslyFaithful Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,552
    Messages:
    3,271
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yea but a more standard well know test would be preferable
     
  6. fatboyslimerr

    fatboyslimerr Alienware M15x Fanatic

    Reputations:
    241
    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Hey CPU Mark is an industry standard (according to their website). Its a pretty good benchmark suite.
    Not sure you're going to get anything better.....
     
  7. Qing Dao

    Qing Dao Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,600
    Messages:
    1,771
    Likes Received:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Tomshardware has done this many times, but usually only within 3 generations. Sometimes they have gone all-out and tested things from 15+ years ago to the then present day. Use google to search on their site.

    Also performance per clock increases with new designs, not die shrinks.
     
  8. HopelesslyFaithful

    HopelesslyFaithful Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,552
    Messages:
    3,271
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know the per clock is on design but I just want to see the history seeing 2920xm vs 3920xm performance per clock plus overall performance give a better picture of everything
     
  9. octiceps

    octiceps Nimrod

    Reputations:
    3,147
    Messages:
    9,944
    Likes Received:
    4,194
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Well those AnandTech charts I linked to in my previous post have Sandy Bridge vs. Ivy Bridge clock-for-clock if that's what you're after. For example i7-2700K vs. 3770K at identical clock speeds:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    2920XM and 3920XM are mobile variants of those two processors anyway.
     
    gdansk likes this.
  10. tijo

    tijo Sacred Blame

    Reputations:
    7,588
    Messages:
    10,023
    Likes Received:
    1,077
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Why not just divide the score by the # of GHz and you'll get a rough idea of performance per GHz and done...
     
  11. Dufus

    Dufus .

    Reputations:
    1,194
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    548
    Trophy Points:
    131
    HopelesslyFaithful likes this.