The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    CPU under full load with turbo boost worth the extra energy/electricity?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by baii, Jun 28, 2013.

  1. baii

    baii Sone

    Reputations:
    1,420
    Messages:
    3,925
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Say I have a set of number to crunch or video to encode over the night. The duration do not matter as long as it finish before I wake up.

    Would I save a bit on my electricity bill if I disable turbo?

    Assume computer will be on regardless so other component don't get into the equation.
     
  2. maverick1989

    maverick1989 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    332
    Messages:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Define save. If you are aiming at saving several dollars, no. Although it probably depends on where you live. In America, in my state, my supplier charges me at the most 9 cents to a kwh. The most power hungry laptop CPU does not cross 60W. You'd need to run that full Turbo for over 16 hours to save 9 cents where I live.
     
  3. Marksman30k

    Marksman30k Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    2,080
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    81
    In theory: Power draw increases exponentially with clockspeed assuming load is the same. Turboboost tends to spike the CPU with more voltage than actually required at that clockspeed to guarantee stability.
    In practice: Laptop CPUs use so little I doubt it makes a meaningful difference, if we were discussing the i7-3960X or a couple of Octa Xeons then it might be meaningful.
     
  4. baii

    baii Sone

    Reputations:
    1,420
    Messages:
    3,925
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Thanks I realize computer use not much energy compare to appliances.

    How about encoding video to smaller file, would it justify its electricity cost.(versus buying new hard disk}
     
  5. unclewebb

    unclewebb ThrottleStop Author

    Reputations:
    7,815
    Messages:
    6,414
    Likes Received:
    6,729
    Trophy Points:
    681
    In general, when a CPU has a task to do, it it best to get that task done as quickly as possible and then either have the CPU get back into one of the low power C States like C6 or better yet, once your computer is finished working, turn it off. That's the best way to save power. Slowing it down is the last thing you want to do.

    Power Optimization – a Reality Check
    http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~krioukov/realityCheck.pdf
     
  6. maverick1989

    maverick1989 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    332
    Messages:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Actually power consumed increases linearly with clock speed and exponentially with voltage. So at double the clock speed, you would at most consume double the power. Even with the 3960X, the TDP is only 150W. Assume that the CPU consumes a max of 250 Watts. Even so, assuming that the user has already reached the top tier for his electricity usage for the month and assuming a US average of 15 cents per kWh, you would still end up spending only about 60 cents an hour. You keep it on all night for 12 hours, that's still about $7.2. This is assuming the CPU runs at max clocks for all those 12 hours.