The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Cache Drive and MBP

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by azn4lif3s, Dec 15, 2012.

  1. azn4lif3s

    azn4lif3s Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    51
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I have a 2011 MBP and an SSD, but after doing some searching I'm beginning to think that a cache drive seems to better fulfill my needs. Will a cache drive increase the read and write speeds enough to justify buying one? Additionally, how hard would it be to install and set it up?
     
  2. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    Can the MBP do SSD caching? I would be surprised if it did. The best I would think available for you is a Hybrid HDD.

    The hardware, the O/S and the manufacturer's support would all need to be called on to make it happen.

    Apple doesn't make things happen, just because it can (it has to have magic - this magic: $$$$).

    See:
    Intel's Z68 Chipset and SSD Caching Reviewed - Mac Rumors


    That's the best I could find on this topic, meaning it seems a no-go. :(
     
  3. Peon

    Peon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    406
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    81
    That info is a bit dated - it's entirely possible to create a DIY Fusion Drive.
     
  4. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    And a 'Fusion Drive' is not Intel SRT tech... is it?
     
  5. azn4lif3s

    azn4lif3s Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    51
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Awh, well this is why I asked before I bought. Thanks bunches!
     
  6. Peon

    Peon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    406
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    81
    And it's not like SRT is the only SSD caching technology out there, as you seem to be implying.
     
  7. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    No, I'm not implying it's the only caching tech out there - just that if I were to rely/depend on a third party solution - it would probably be only Intel's... (if top stability and performance are equally important).
     
  8. Peon

    Peon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    406
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Given how Core Storage (the underlying technology enabling Fusion Drive) is a first-party OS-layer technology, and given Apple's stellar reputation for delivering trouble-free user experiences, I'd say Fusion Drive on a Mac is even safer than SRT on Windows, if that's what you're concerned about.

    Even if that weren't the case, I believe that it's better to provide all relevant possibilities and let the reader make the final decision, than to only provide information on things that I personally believe in. After all, what ultimately suits the reader best may be something that I'm personally opposed to... I guess the $500 craptops that are often mentioned on the What Notebook Should I Buy forum are a good example of this - while I would never get one personally, for someone who just needs a basic computer and doesn't have much of a budget, they're a perfect match.