Just got a 16GB flash drive and a 320gb 3.5 HD that's being re purposed as an external. What's the best middle ground cluster size for storage and performance?
PS: Also looking for a nice <= $30 sata enclosure for the 320. eSata optional.
-
From what I understand about cluster size it doesn't make much difference on flash drives because of the low seek times.
-
I heard that too but I heard something about it affecting storage in some way.
-
Doesn't really matter. Small cluster sizes waste less space, large cluster sizes lead to less fragmentation, but flash memory doesn't suffer from fragmentation like HDDs.
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
Of course they suffer fragmentation - just like HD do.
The best cluster size is 4K - Windows and most programs expect/work best with that size.
The only reason to change it is if you are storing only one type of file (large or small) on the drive - then, you may notice a small difference, but not one to worry over.
4K (default) NTFS is the best overall. -
Cluster size?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Kfactor, Feb 15, 2010.