Hi,
I have to admit, I'm a bit overwhelmed by the new "Sandy Bridge" HD3000 integrated CPUs. I wish they had an easy numbering system like in the past (e.g. Pentium 3 was better than a Pentium 2...etc).
So I witnessed the amazing graphics with the new Core i5s. Great FPS, smooth gameplay...etc. So I'm like, "Great! I can get a laptop with this new amazing Sandy Bridge Core". I looked online, and sure enough, the FPS is satisfactory for my gaming needs.
Now, I'm thinking of getting a laptop with the Intel® Core i5-2537M Processor , and looked at the fine details. It turns out that their CPU's Graphics Base Frequency starts at 350 MHZ. And the demonstration I watched was done on a Intel® Core i5-2500K Processor with a Graphics Base Frequency at a much higher rate of 850 - MHZ. It's my understanding that the Graphics Frequency is what dictates that power of the graphics component, is that correct?
That being said, since my i5-2537M's frequency only starts at 350MHZ, is this CPU's graphical power equivalent to much older, first generation core i5s? Or am I over emphasizing the importance of the this number and should trust that these second generation i5 Mobiles cores can perform closer to the desktop i5 2500Ks cores?
Thanks!
-
Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!
In this image you can see, the naming nomenclature, well at least part of it.
For the mobile line up:
i5 2537m
i5 2540m
i5 2410m
i5 = mainstream
2 = 2nd generation of the core i line of processors
5 = Generally available chips
37 = ULV and LV chips
40 = full voltage processor, the number could also be 10, 20, 30
4 = oem cheap processor, this could also be 6
The thing here is that you are buying a ULV processor, and wont enjoy the full graphics capability. Actually there is also the problem that you are not chosing a quad core, which is also faster in the graphics dept than the dual core versions (not only that)Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015
Comparing the Intel Core i5 processors
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by SZ-zer, Apr 13, 2011.