The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Comparison between Intel i7-2760QM vs i7-2820QM

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Tarquin, Nov 27, 2011.

  1. Tarquin

    Tarquin Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hi guys, I need you opinion in choosing between those 2 processors.

    I found this promotion for Clevo P150HM. Currently it is equipped with Intel i7-2760QM but they give free upgrade to i7-2820QM.

    As far as I understand, the i7-2760 is the newer generation compare to i7-2820 and it has higher clock speed, but the i7-2820 has better better L3 cache.

    So I want to know is the free upgrade actually worth it, what are the benefits from upgrading, which has the best value for money and if you guys have to choose would you go with the i7-2760 or i7-2820?

    Thanks :)
     
  2. Charles P. Jefferies

    Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    22,339
    Messages:
    36,639
    Likes Received:
    5,075
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Both of those processors are "second-generation" Core i7 variants and are architecturally identical. The i7-2820QM is slightly faster than the i7-2670QM. If the upgrade is free, get it.
     
  3. Nick

    Nick Professor Carnista

    Reputations:
    3,870
    Messages:
    4,089
    Likes Received:
    641
    Trophy Points:
    181
    Passmark processor benchmark:

    2820QM: 7462
    2760QM: 7575

    Pretty much identical.
     
  4. Tarquin

    Tarquin Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Thanks for the info guys... Really appreciate it :)
     
  5. Althernai

    Althernai Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    919
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    66
    It is indeed slightly faster than the 2670QM, but keep in mind that the upgrade is from a 2760QM. Thus, the "upgrade" is essentially a trade of an extra 100MHz of clock speed for 2MB of extra cache. It's basically identical, but unless you are using a rare cache-bound application, I don't see the point.
     
  6. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    I would definitely pass on this 'free' upgrade - they are simply trying to clear their old inventory of processors.

    While the less than 2% difference between the cpu's (with the faster one being the i7 2670QM) is not what I would base my decision on; it is the fact that the i7 2820QM is Q1 2011 'tech' while the newer i7 2760QM is Q4 2011.

    In your shoes, I would NOT opt for the 'free upgrade' - it is a lesser processor in my eyes.

    See:
    Compare Intel® Products

    See:
    PassMark - Intel Core i7-2820QM @ 2.30GHz - Price performance comparison

    See:
    PassMark - Intel Core i7-2760QM @ 2.40GHz - Price performance comparison


    The 'proof' that I have on recommending this way is this:

    The 33% more cache is still not enough (in PM 'scores', at least) to offset the ~4% increase in base clock speed for the 2670QM.

    This makes the 2670QM overall more efficient per clock cycle and at the same TDP rating both processors share.

    As mentioned; unless your usage scenario specifically requires a larger cache (mostly server type workloads...), then this 'upgrade' is really a downgrade in all ways that are actually important imo.

    Always buy the latest hardware - no matter how tempting a nominally higher end, but older model seems - the latest revisions are there for a reason (lower energy consumption, higher ipc, optimized micro-code, etc.).

    Instead of taking this 'free' offer - I would ask what else can they offer in it's place - like 16/32GB RAM 'free' instead. :)

    Good luck.
     
  7. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,431
    Messages:
    58,189
    Likes Received:
    17,900
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Q1 tech, Q3 tech? What? Do you have detailed specs on intel's process tweaks? Are they for power/speed or yield improvements but for slightly lower quality chips?

    Considering the margin intel are operating at due to the lack of competition you have no way of knowing.

    Just look at the speed and the cache, decide which affects the programs you use more and opt for that one.
     
  8. gull_s_777

    gull_s_777 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    considering 6MB cache plenty already....
    i would go for extra 100MHz...