The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Comparison chart of SSDs

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Cloudfire, Mar 25, 2011.

  1. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Cloudfire, Mar 25, 2011
    #1
  2. hizzaah

    hizzaah Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,672
    Messages:
    2,418
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    101
    hizzaah, Mar 25, 2011
    #2
  3. namaiki

    namaiki "basically rocks" Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    3,905
    Messages:
    6,116
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Hmm.. Too bad that they tested the C300 on SATA II. It would have scored just a bit better on SATA III for sequential read.
     
    namaiki, Mar 25, 2011
    #3
  4. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Thanks hizzah. I`ve updated the first post :)

    LOL i found one that is even more updated :p
     
    Cloudfire, Mar 25, 2011
    #4
  5. Tsunade_Hime

    Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow

    Reputations:
    5,413
    Messages:
    10,711
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Yeah kind dumb not having C300 on SATA 3 as they were one of the first SATA 3 SSDs on the market..
     
    Tsunade_Hime, Mar 25, 2011
    #5
  6. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I found the C300 on their site where they was testing it with SATA 3. Don`t know why it isn`t on the list. I could edit the table and add it, but too much work so i added the CrystalDisk result :)
    And the list should be organised from the fastest to the slowest...
     
    Cloudfire, Mar 25, 2011
    #6
  7. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,877
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Nice comparison chart, thanks! +1
     
    HTWingNut, Mar 26, 2011
    #7
  8. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Intel 320 added
     
    Cloudfire, Mar 28, 2011
    #8
  9. yuio

    yuio NBR Assistive Tec. Tec.

    Reputations:
    634
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    hmmm, the 320 doesn't really fair that well IMO. come on intel it's time to catch up with the leaders... once others put competor out for the Vertex 3 it's price will fall quickly...
     
    yuio, Mar 28, 2011
    #9
  10. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I agree. G3s was a little "Meh" for me. Some rumours are saying that Intel is investigating SF controllers...
     
    Cloudfire, Mar 28, 2011
    #10
  11. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Don't think they're going to be rumours much longer...
     
    sgogeta4, Mar 28, 2011
    #11