The cost difference between the two can be staggering; before I buy, is there a large difference between their performances?
-
-
get the 2.0
-
Im not an expert but I wouldnt imagine there would be a huge difference and for me it would all depend on the price difference, is it like 60-100 dollors or only like 20-30 dollors? If its only like 20 or 30 then go for it why not? If its around 60-100 then i would say dont do it.
-
Get Ram and HD upgrade with the cash, and get the 2.0
~Arman -
INEEDMONEY Homicidal Teddy Bear
I concur with ArmanSLR. You probably won't see much of a difference to justify the price jump
-
Yeah--for instance, on an Asus configuration that I was toying around with, the difference was $480.
-
teamkillahilla Notebook Evangelist
I agree with ArmanSLR... spend the money on a faster hdd and more/faster ram
-
Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator
Intel's top-shelf processors are not worth the premium. The best price/performance is normally the third one down from the top.
-
buying retail I think the difference is $100+, and therefore not worth it over the 2.0
-
LEts put it this way... 160 more mhz for like 50-100 bucks... nah
-
I bought the cheapest because I know that in six months, I can buy the fastest upgrade possible without the premium - and the frees up cash for other upgrades.Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015 -
I believe I read in another post at this site that someone did some benchmarking between the two and and there was not a great change.
I too am going through the same issue.
I'm pretty sure I'm going to be going with the 2500 though because I figure it'd save me some money, and I can try putting a merom in if someone gets us a new bios
Core Duo: 2.0GHz vs. 2.16GHz
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Whacktissimo, Jul 26, 2006.