The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
  1. Spartan@HIDevolution

    Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative

    Reputations:
    39,584
    Messages:
    23,560
    Likes Received:
    36,855
    Trophy Points:
    931
  2. TomJGX

    TomJGX I HATE BGA!

    Reputations:
    1,456
    Messages:
    8,707
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    Trophy Points:
    431
    MLC to TLC is the question.. Looks like more TLC lol..
     
    Spartan@HIDevolution likes this.
  3. Mr.Koala

    Mr.Koala Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    568
    Messages:
    2,307
    Likes Received:
    566
    Trophy Points:
    131
    At least it's not QLC yet.
     
    alexhawker likes this.
  4. superparamagnetic

    superparamagnetic Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    402
    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    41
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/crucial-mx300-750gb-ssd,4544.html
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/10274/the-crucial-mx300-750gb-ssd-review-microns-3d-nand-arrives
    http://techreport.com/review/30267/crucial-mx300-ssd-reviewed

    I think the summary is that this is a... whelming launch. The drive itself is a bit of a let down, but the 3D NAND process appears to be keeping it's promise.

    The overall performance picture I got is that the MX300 performs a bit worse than the MX200. Depending on how you look at it, the drive either sits at the bottom of the MLC stack, or at the top of the TLC stack. This isn't too surprising given the use the TLC and a 4-channel controller (the other MX-series use MLC and 8-channels).

    But at the same time, this drive which uses TLC NAND comes pretty close to MLC in terms performance, endurance, and power consumption. I think this is a clear indication of the superiority of their 3D NAND process over planar NAND. If their 3D TLC comes close to planar MLC, then I am very excited to see what their 3D MLC can do when paired it with a proper 8-channel PCIe controller.

    That drive of course is the Ballistix TX3, which I think Micron should have launched first to showcase their 3D NAND. But maybe Intel hogged all the MLC and they were left launching this. It's not the huge disappointment that the BX200 was, but it's nothing to get excited about either.

    I think it's clear that Micron is positioning this as a value product given the use of TLC and 4-channel controller. My guess is that at some point they'll kill off the abomination that is the BX200, the MX300 will assume the value role, while the TX3 will be the performance drive. Given that positioning, I do think it'll end up selling well once the price drops 10-20%, especially given it's higher end features like encryption and power-loss protection. If they can hit $0.20/GB, then this will become the go-to value drive to get (i.e. the new BX100).
     
    Spartan@HIDevolution likes this.
  5. Starlight5

    Starlight5 Yes, I'm a cat. What else is there to say, really?

    Reputations:
    826
    Messages:
    3,230
    Likes Received:
    1,643
    Trophy Points:
    231
    I hope they will finally solve hardware encryption problems affecting older Crucial drives.
    Also, I would prefer m.2 2280 drive over 2.5", for future-proofing.
     
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2016
    Spartan@HIDevolution likes this.
  6. TomJGX

    TomJGX I HATE BGA!

    Reputations:
    1,456
    Messages:
    8,707
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    Trophy Points:
    431
    So it was TLC.. Disappointing...