High Performance could make the difference, if it isn't your CPU could be parking cores or something. Also have you done any registry tweeks for an SSD or something? Those can reduce CPU performance.
According to passmark the average is 7196
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-2720QM+%40+2.20GHz
You should try some other benchmarks, this one could be an anomoly. What is your CPU score on 3dMarkVantage?
-
-
But isn't the turbo function activated when 1-2 cores is in use?
I will try with 3dMarkVantage after work.
No tweaks to SSD. -
-
I am thinking about possibly upgrading my Thinkpad T420's CPU with one of these, since they are half the price of a retail chip. Are ES chips safe to use?
-
-
3dmark 2011:
Processor clock
2993 MHz
Score:
P2009 3DMarks
Your result has the following problem(s) and will not be shown for example on leaderboards:: Graphics driver is not approved. (What is this?) -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Hey just ran passmark with my Q154 and got 8055 with my hyper-X ram and windows set to high performance.
-
i cannot stress enough the importance of having throttlestop when running benchmarking tools. Throttlestop cuts off windows and forces its own power control. just set the multi to turbo and all modulations to 100%, turn it on, and it will give the best possible performance. Windows power management for the CPU is BS in my opinion.
-
And I only get 6995. Sick... -
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Ran it again to take a SS, got a slightly lower result:
I get 7282 on battery in balanced. -
Hmmm, looks like there is a lot of variation in ES performance. This makes me think they are a risky investment in that performance is not guaranteed. I returned my ES CPU. I was able to buy a new M17 for a great deal and decided getting the 2720 from Dell was better so could get a 4 year complete care warranty. Also the 6970m GPU on my original M17 died suddenly, this made me value my warranty more than I had original thought I would.
-
I also tried ThrottleStop 3.20 but it does not apply any chances, though they are not grayed out. Anyone can provide info about this?
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Is it turned on?
Also why are your TM1 and TM2 dissabled? -
-
Regarding the TM1/TM2 , HWINFO64 says it's Supported but disbled. Although I cannot edit it in my bios or so. -
niffcreature ex computer dyke
OK, regardless of the temp sensors, isn't it pretty obvious you got a bad chip and should return it?
-
I think so, but I think I need more evidence of the cpu malfunctioning , I'm running benchmarks now any tips?
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Make sure it gets through the intel burn test.
-
Prime 95 @30min no crash/error;
IntelBurnInTest @ standard No crash/error;
Burn in + Furmark :
-
I got my Core i7 2720QM ES 8MB Q154. No problem at all except it is performing like a core i7 2630qm...It performs nice on one core super pi = 11s so no problem here but i get i7 2630qm scores on 8 cores ;-)
No throttle issues since temps are low and the cpu is always in turbo mode under load.
Either i'm not lucky on the sample or my vostro rig is not that good.
Anyway it's a big performance boost from a core i3 2310M
Can you guys run this x264 bench, please ?
to http://forums.techarp.com/reviews-articles/26363-x264-hd-benchmark-4-0-a.html
Here are the results i got :
Results for x264.exe r1913
==========================
Pass 1
------
encoded 1442 frames, 106.19 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 105.08 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 106.07 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 106.29 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
Pass 2
------
encoded 1442 frames, 25.87 fps, 3960.48 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 25.85 fps, 3959.57 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 25.85 fps, 3959.16 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 25.89 fps, 3959.32 kb/s -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Lol, mine are identical:
Pass 1
------
encoded 1442 frames, 128.74 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 123.58 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 122.43 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 124.08 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
Pass 2
------
encoded 1442 frames, 29.42 fps, 3959.19 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 27.38 fps, 3959.81 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 27.33 fps, 3960.19 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 27.12 fps, 3959.35 kb/s -
Yours is performing noticeably better, 15% more in the first pass...that's a huge gap for the same ES but that's what i was expecting. I made benchmarks and my perfs are between core i7 2730qm and the core i7 2720qm on 8 threads. But on one or two threads it is working fine i have same perfs than the core i7 2720qm.
At least i'm performing better than this guy with his core i7 2630qm:
x264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Page 4 - Tech ARP Forums
One good point is that i will not experience throttling like him even after hours of stress since my temps are really fine.
Overall i'm happy with the purchase it's far enough powerful for my needs but i'm a little disappointed when i see your results.
Another interesting thing is that this cpu is colder while idling than the core i3 2310M i had. The fan is off 99% of the time while surfing on the web now. It wasn't the case before. -
One question meaker what are the frequencies of your 2720qm while your are stressing it on 8 threads ?
Mine starts at 2,6ghz for several seconds and then stabilizes at 2,5ghz for the rest of the time.
If you could do some Hyper pi benchies on 1,2 and 4 threads that would be great, it's a fast bench and you can easily choose the number of threads :
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?176904-Hyper-PI-0.99b
I'd like to know if my loss in perf is only on 8 threads by curiosity. -
Mine
Pass 1
------
encoded 1442 frames, 101.59 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 95.49 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 96.69 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 95.89 fps, 3911.63 kb/s
Pass 2
------
encoded 1442 frames, 22.49 fps, 3959.01 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 23.09 fps, 3958.61 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 22.72 fps, 3960.17 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 23.10 fps, 3959.45 kb/s -
-
Thanks for you results.
For Aogenmark :
AOGenMark 1.3.0: Simple Multi-Core CPU Benchmark - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com
You have to use the .bat files included in the archive to lauch the benchies.
But you can use Hyper Pi if you want it's faster.
Here's what i get with Hyper PI 1M :
1T : 11s575
2T : 15,975s
4T : 17,253s -
-
Seems your cpu is even worst than mine. Buying an ES cpu looks like a lottery...But QS samples are far more expensive.
I bet meaker has a higher turbo on 8 threads. That would explain everything. -
Hehe, yeah. But it is cheap compared to a new cpuI will buy i7 extreme next year.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Yes when running that test it goes at 3ghz.
1T = 3.3ghz
2T = 3.2ghz
4-8T = 3.0ghz -
Damn that's one of a turbo. Surrealist. Even OEM cpus don't have such a turbo. Lucky you. The seller must be in love with you to sell you this one ;-)
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Really? I thought once all the real cores were reached turbo stayed the same for any more threads.
What's it supposed to be? -
-
I have this :
1T = 3.3ghz
2T = 3.2ghz
4-8T = 2,5ghz
Your cpu can stay at 3ghz fully 4-8T loaded for hours ? -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
If you smack it with something like linX then it will oscillate between 2.5-2.8ghz (starting a 3ghz), if you are running a normal load like a game it will happily sit at 3ghz all day long.
-
Mine sits at 2,5 ghz all day long. Games or Linx don't change anything. The hottest core remains under 75 degrees celcius so it's fine. It would probably burn at 3 ghz ;-)
Under some benchies i hit almost 80W on my wattmeter and my power adapter is rated at 90W. So i don't think it could handle a more power hungry cpu. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Ah but I have a dual heatpipe dedicated cooler designed to take up to a 2920XM
-
That's all ? i'm not impressed ;-)
there will be more powerfull 45W cpus than this crappy 55W 2920XM soon ;-)
Anyway i never buy high end cpus that's a rule. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
55W is 55W, regardless of the speed of those CPUs, it will handle any 45W CPU at any speed.
-
How can I change the multiplier? Program for Windows?
-
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
I don't believe the 2720 ES are unlocked.
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
I had a 2630qm that sat at 2.4ghz all day long 8 threads going 100% -
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
I'm running the unlocked A08 bios so at first my 2630qm would hit over 2.9ghz...but then as time went on, it would drop slowly...eventually settling at 2.45ghz
run prime95 or some other CPU stress tool and monitor your MHZ in something like HWINFO64
My current CPU (2820) will turbo at first at 3.4ghz, but it settles at 2.8ghz with all 8 threads @ 100% utilization -
moral hazard Notebook Nobel Laureate
SlickDude80 did you try using intel XTU version 3, you may be able to get your cpu to stay at 3.4ghz.
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
So my 2820 stays at 3.2ghz forever (after a slight 5% increase to the bclk). I haven't tried upping the tdp any higher but i haven't had a need to. -
Wow i will try this when i get back home. That sounds amazing for benching!
Difference between ES 2720qm?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Raidriar, Jun 16, 2011.