Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
What do you think guyz ( for those who really understand what is behind the technology)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yeah because 4k has more dense pixels and lower resolution will look bad as it needs bigger more dense pixels ... But I play in 2k@60 in warzone settings and TV still has 4k resolution so it kind of downscales but the picture is still amazing so my best gameplay is 2k ... If I set to 4k@60 the 1660 super becomes too weak sadly..
Attached Files:
Last edited: Jan 25, 2021 -
-
From my personal experience, definitely not fake.
300Hz on my Dell G5 Gaming Laptop.
300Hz selected in Overwatch.
Do Refresh Rates matter? Of course, but it depends like with all things... *
60Hz to 100Hz = Huge jump and obviously noticeable.
100Hz to 120Hz = Takes a trained eye, but noticeable to those with seasoned eyes.
120Hz to 144Hz = Maybe some really good fps game players 'might' be able to, but I'd put money on the fact that if you did a double blind test, they wouldn't score 100%.
144Hz+ = Pro gamer territory... again do a double blind test with a major fps type gamer and they won't be able to tell. These tests have been done many times before, even with using lower refresh rate monitors and they still got it wrong in guessing what Hz went with what Monitor.
I actually envy those still playing on 1080p, because your eyes haven't been spoiled yet. IMO 1440p is the perfect sweet spot, but I now game at 4K.
4K gaming is at a whole another level. Unless you've experienced it, it's really hard to judge, but even then it depends on the game..
Take Cyberpunk 2077 for example. I've been doing a lot of in game tests with different GPU's, Settings and Resolutions. Going from 4K to 1080p is Night and Day. 1080p looks very soft and blurry compared to 4K, which is obvious in other instances as well..
So the 4K bandwagon people are jumping on is for a reason, one that blows 1080p visuals out of the water.
I'll never go 1080p again for a main monitor for a laundry list of reasons, but 1080p is perfectly fine for fast paced games etc... there's nothing wrong with it, but to someone who has the hardware and panel to play at 1440p or 4K, there's a lot of things wrong with 1080p in that sense, because it is inferior in almost every way.
Image quality and not having a blurry picture is important to most people...
My favorite Resolution is still 1440p all around as it provides the best of both worlds in respect to the current gen hardware that we have.
(Although with Cyberpunk 2077 with my RTX 3090, I can play 4K @ 70 FPS with Ultra Presets w/ DLSS on Quality, which is acceptable given that it is 4K. ie... At least it isn't >30 FPS, which is not doable for most people including myself.)
@Peto Pedro ah yes the LG CX 48", what a beauty... it's absolutely stunning and it really spoils your eyes. I think LG should have put a warning label on the TV stating "Buyer or Shopper be aware, look at your own risk as experiencing this TV may permanently damage your calibration for when it comes to gaming TV/monitors. LG is not responsible for users throwing their 1080p out the window and into the trash. Proceed at your own risk."
No, but really ... I would argue that if one has the space the LG CX 48" is a much better value than some of these $1500+ gaming wide screen monitors. I almost got one, but I would be sitting too close to it due to how my office is set up.
@Tech Junky Yea I agree... 120/144Hz is way more than enough..again, there are numerous double blind tests done and even really good gamers couldn't tell...
I've always used this analogy..."Give a Pro gamer a 60Hz monitor with the bare minimum hardware, dollar tree mouse etc... and give an avg gamer the top end 100000000000000000Hz monitor, top end hardware etc.... the Pro Gamer would still eat the avg gamer for lunch lol.
"
ie... Sure better hardware is awesome, but that doesn't translate to necessarily making you a better gamer, just because of the hardware... sure there are aspects to having better hardware that can help you, but as they say... it's the driver, not the car within reason. But you get the point..Attached Files:
Last edited: Dec 28, 2020Aivxtla, tilleroftheearth and Tech Junky like this. -
-
1080p looks pretty good on 15.6 / 17.3 panels to be sure, especially since you dont often need AA to smooth out the edges, or much of it for most people.
You cut the resolution in half of a 65" panel. Even 4K at 65" is kind of meh in tandem of PC use, so 1080p @ 65" is hardly surprising.
We dont particularly see in FPS but in motion. One thing you will also notice is simply going up to 75hz is actually quite a huge improvement over 60hz. 120hz/144hz is a good spot for many. Im not sure if I care about 240hz/300hz as Im not rich enough to push those kind of frames but maybe someday
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sounds like some goal posts are moving
-
-
-
Do you think that laptop screens with 240Hz or 300Hz are a gimmick?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Peto Pedro, Dec 28, 2020.
