The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Does a 32bit OS realize it's running on a 64bit processor?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by kabooky, Aug 4, 2006.

  1. kabooky

    kabooky Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Say for example your running Windows Xp Pro, which is a 32bit OS, and your running on a 64bit processor like the Merom. Will the OS and Merom function any differently than if it were a Yonah, disregarding the change in frequency, bus speed, cache, efficiency etcetera?

    Or try answering this- If I have some professional software that runs in XP Pro perfectly fine on a Yonah, can I pretty much assume it will run fine in XP Pro on the Merom, just faster, better and cooler?
     
  2. ZaZ

    ZaZ Super Model Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,982
    Messages:
    34,001
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    581
    It will run the same, but a little faster.
     
  3. Zero

    Zero The Random Guy

    Reputations:
    422
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    To answer your fisrt question, no Windows XP Pro would run just the same if it were on Yonah or Merom, if diregarding clock frequency etc.

    To answer your second question, i would say yes. Programs aren't concerned about what the processors name is, they simply want the job doing as quick as possible. So, the prgram will utilise whatever the processor can offer, be it a larger cache or a faster clock speed.
     
  4. miner

    miner Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    1,326
    Messages:
    7,137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    If the OS is 32bit,then it will run as it would on any processor. Merom is a 23/64bit processor and so can run in both modes. It might be a little bit faster, but that would be due to the improvements to the core, not due to the presence of 64bit.
     
  5. kabooky

    kabooky Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    My concern was if that if a program ran without problems utilizing the dual core structure of a 32bit processor, would the structural changes of the 64bit dual core processor be anything that could upset --- anything. So if the Merom will run just as if it were a 32bit, except better- that is fantastic.
     
  6. Thaenatos

    Thaenatos Zero Cool

    Reputations:
    1,581
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    231
    No x86 architecture cant tell the difference between a 64bit or 32bit. But the x64 can, thats the difference. When and only when the kernel can take advantage of the 64bits will you notice a difference. Otherwise its standard 32bit mode.
     
  7. Jalf

    Jalf Comrade Santa

    Reputations:
    2,883
    Messages:
    3,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Nah, it'll run exactly the same. In 32-bit mode, it is 100% 32 bit, and the all 64-bit stuff is simply disabled. You get full, absolute, 100% compatibility, so no, it won't upset anything.

    But also, it won't improve performance either. All 64 bit features aren't there, as far as the OS and programs running on it, are concerned.
     
  8. Lyshen

    Lyshen Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    96
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I think what Zaz meant by 'It will run the same but faster' response is that it will run faster due to using Merom which is clock per clock a little faster then Yonah. Which is in response to the second question, not the first by kabooky.