The jump between horses and cars... is a bit more than the jump between cpu architectures.
A more accurate metaphor would be engines, which are backwards compatible sometimes.
Intel has no need to make things backwards compatible -- they make more money when they don't.
-
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
First off; Intel profits whether or not things are backwards compatible.
Secondly; you have no idea about engines either. lol... -
You can go through life never being happy with what's available and what you can have/afford. There will always be better processors/motherboards/RAM/drives/desktops/laptops/netbooks/wives/cars/homes/jobs/tv's/games etc.
It's pointless getting sucked in. Luckily with age most of us realise that the grass isn't necessarily greener on the other side at all times and that with more there always comes a cost.
From a power use to performance ratio though newer processor technologies are always welcome. For as long as there's money they'll be innovation. -
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
-
-
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
-
I like the new direction of CPU architecture. -
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
-
What I don't like about Forbes magazine's predictions is that even Macbook Pros will eliminate discrete cards and go to Intel only.
Is Intel going to pick up their game or not? The HD 3000 is still, relatively, a crap graphics chip. If we are to go to integrated only then we are going to have to see an IGP that is actually decent. -
Obviously it's not a promise, but it holds some hope. -
-
The article has the right of it, though. Even two years+ away, Haswell's graphics are already behind. -
-
I'm annoyed that Intel is withholding native USB 3.0 support for mobile chipsets until mid/late next year.
I assume it's because of the chipsets that mid-to low-end notebooks have either Bluetooth or USB 3.0 ports, but never both. I could be way off base, but I suspect this happens because the mid-range machines only have two mini-PCI Express slots. One is used for the WiFi NIC. The other is occupied with either a USB 3.0 adapter or a Bluetooth module. So you don't get both. But there are plenty of lousy USB 2.0 ports to go around. -
As far as I know it's going to be a 30% improvement. Which, in the grand scheme of things, is pretty worthless.
We need to see at least 200% improvement.
@CoreEye5 - if that was true, then how does my laptop have both Bluetooth and USB 3.0? -
-
You can have USB 3.0 and Bluetooth by means of add-on devices. Nothing stopping the mfg. from doing that other than cost. Which I'm guessing is why you don't often see both Bluetooth and USB 3.0 on current mid- to low-price laptops -
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
-
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
-
really looking forwards this Haswell...one single charge and a whole day usage
Intel Hasswell 22nm CPU Will Enable 10-Day Battery Life - Softpedia -
That 10 days battery life is for systems on standby... not actual use.
Besides, cpu's don't consume much power at all.
Screens are the biggest power suckers (regardless of the LED tech) actually when it comes to active use.
And, just because 1 component in the entire system is power efficient, doesn't mean others will be.
It also depends on manufacturers. -
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
-
Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow
Interesting how they are literally moving everything to the CPU.
-
-
-
No 6-core mobile chips? That sucks.
-
Moving processes to the CPU is nothing new--the original main frame processors were all in one. I would go into more detail--however-I need some liquid refreshment.I'm back--what I want for Christmas is a "Super Computer" in my Lenovo/IBM laptop,,hahahahahahahahahahahahha.
Cheers
3Fees -
-
But the ordinary solitaire playing computer user would probably see no use for more than 4 cores! -
I'm wondering when the Intel GPU will get 10-bit display support, so we can have switchable graphics with high end displays... Ivy Bridge? Haswell?
-
Damn seeing this stuff makes me feel like my desktop is an old man.... still fast as hell though.
i7-920 bloomfield @ 4.0ghz
surprised that I've had it now for over 2 years and have no desire to upgrade really. -
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
-
So can we Forget Intel Haswell, Broadwell on the way?
-
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
-
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
-
Haswell New Instruction Descriptions Now Available! Blogs - Intel® Software Network -
If this tock is as significant as Sandy bridge one, this will be a hell of a tock.
-
I don't think I've ever used avx in my quads. In what situations would these new set of instructions be of help?
Sent from my samsung galaxy s2 using tapatalk
Sent from my samsung galaxy s2 using tapatalk -
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
trvelbug said: ↑I don't think I've ever used avx in my quads. In what situations would these new set of instructions be of help?
Sent from my samsung galaxy s2 using tapatalk
Sent from my samsung galaxy s2 using tapatalkClick to expand... -
trvelbug said: ↑I don't think I've ever used avx in my quads. In what situations would these new set of instructions be of help?Click to expand...
You might find the the first adopters will be number crunching softwares but even then with software such as prime95 AVX is still very much work in progress, not finalized yet, even though AVX instructions have been available for over a year now.
I guess most software houses are going to write software that will run on the majority of processors/systems and there are still a lot of older processors out there that do not support AVX. Even Windows didn't support AVX until SP1 for W7 so versions before that can not natively run AVX properly. -
I do video editing so I'm quite interested in the new avx and fpo instruction set.
But although I see sse support I've can't remember seeing avx support on any program. It would be interesting though cause these could have major effects on video editing and transcoding especially with quick sync integration
Sent from my samsung galaxy s2 using tapatalk -
I think this is very cool. Look how small it is (and Ivy Bridge) compared to Nehalem
Intel Haswell Pre-Production Sample Pictured News FlyingSuicide.Net -
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
Intel Haswell iGPU: there's something for everyone by VR-Zone.com
Quite a few web sites, including our own, covered Haswell graphics prospects over the past few months, with source materials obtained from Intel's roadmaps and such. On one side, the argument was that the generic - mainstream - quad-core Haswell version, the one likely to see the light of the day first in the second quarter of 2013, will very likely have graphics less than half faster than than the quad core Ivy Bridge it replaces. The other side had a statement that the best Haswell graphics should be well over two times, if not more, faster, than the Ivy Bridge.
Actually, both might be right - how come? There are three graphics varieties expected for Haswell - GT1, GT2 and, the fastest, GT3. The latter one is expected to have twice as many shaders as the GT2, however some of leaked documents show that particular graphics implementation as existing only on dual core Haswell flavours. For instance, you'd have a combination of quad CPU cores and GT2 graphics, or dual CPU cores and GT3 graphics. Or, for top end Ultrabooks, dual CPU cores and GT2 graphics... oh my, how many die varieties would be there then?
If this ends up the case, it explains it all: the standard quad-core Haswell with GT2 would be somewhat, but not madly, faster in graphics than the Ivy Bridge, while the graphics-oriented dual-core GT3 part with much larger GPU will correspondingly bring along much faster GPU - including GPU compute, since Haswell is expected to support it. But then, with all the transistor budgets and 22 nm process on hand, what stops Intel from having the ultimate combination of quad CPU cores and GT3 graphics together - a lovely solution both for high end desktop and engineering workstation? The time will tell if this might be the hidden weapon Intel keeps under the hood...Click to expand... -
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
2013 mobile Shark Bay platform promises NFC
Intel used a saucy word to describe the 2013 Haswell based notebook platform. It tells us that Shark Bay should reinvigorate the notebook experience. Revive would seem to be the more appropriate word in this case.
Shark Bay promises more sensors, faster resume times, Intel smart connect as well as connected stand by. All this will be present on at least some Shark Bay powered notebooks.
Intel also wants to bring more improved connected capabilities to 2013 notebooks. It promises NFC support, Thunderbolt paired up with now standard Intel Wireless display.
With more fuzz about sensors, NFC, all-day battery and thin and light approach Intel’s notebook of the future is basically a tablet with a keyboard that probably costs a bit more money and offers traditional PC functionality.
The future is looking good, but we still have to see Ivy Bridge in action, and we have to wait some 14 months from today before we actually see Shark Bay 2013 and Haswell.Click to expand...
Intel has detailed the Shark Bay 2013 two-chip platform, Haswell a new architecture with new graphics and new 22nm CPU core paired up with the Lynx Point chipset. This is the first part of platform that we wrote about here.
Intel also hinted out that there will be a one-chip Shark Bay platform. We don’t know many details about Shark Bay one-chip platform apart of the fact that it exists and that Intel will give more details about it in the near future.
One can only speculate that it is a full System-on-Chip that comes with chipset integrated in the same package as the CPU and GPU. This will enable Intel to make smaller motherboards, save a few additional watts and put itself in a better position to fight ARM devices.Click to expand... -
Jayayess1190 said: ↑Click to expand...
-
-
nice info! I wonder if that would affect tray CPU or only on laptops.
-
Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake
Intel 22nm Haswell Processors Will Launch in March 2013, Says Report - Softpedia
According to DigiTimes, the outfit has scheduled the official introduction of these processors, and that of the accompanying Lynx Point chipsets, for March of 2013.
No specific date was mentioned as we are still a year away from the alleged launch, but this report seems to confirm a leaked Intel slide, which made its appearance about a month ago, revealing that Haswell is scheduled for a March-June release.
This previous report also mentioned that Intel would go for a multi-stage launch for Haswell, the first chips to arrive making part of the Core i5 and Core i7 product lines.
These will cover the mainstream and performance sector, while the lower-end Core i3 processors are expected to be launched later next year.
Haswell will be a “Tock” on Intel’s roadmap, meaning that it has an entirely new architecture built using the 22nm production node.
With Haswell, Intel plans to split its product range into two distinct groups.
Mobile chips will be available in the same dual or quad-core configurations, but feature the more powerful Intel GT3 GPU, while the memory controller only supports DDR3L DIMMs.
Other features include support for the DirectX 11.1 API, support for the AVX2 instruction set, as well as a series of IPC improvements meant to increase single-thread performance.Click to expand... -
Why would the memory controller care if it's DDR3L or DDR3?
-
H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw
HTWingNut said: ↑Why would the memory controller care if it's DDR3L or DDR3?Click to expand...
Forget Intel Ivy Bridge, Haswell on the way
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Jayayess1190, Jan 28, 2011.