The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous pageNext page →

    Forget Intel Ivy Bridge, Haswell on the way

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Jayayess1190, Jan 28, 2011.

  1. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    661
    Messages:
    2,348
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The jump between horses and cars... is a bit more than the jump between cpu architectures.

    A more accurate metaphor would be engines, which are backwards compatible sometimes.

    Intel has no need to make things backwards compatible -- they make more money when they don't.
     
  2. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    First off; Intel profits whether or not things are backwards compatible.

    Secondly; you have no idea about engines either. lol... ;)
     
  3. LaptopUser247

    LaptopUser247 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You can go through life never being happy with what's available and what you can have/afford. There will always be better processors/motherboards/RAM/drives/desktops/laptops/netbooks/wives/cars/homes/jobs/tv's/games etc.

    It's pointless getting sucked in. Luckily with age most of us realise that the grass isn't necessarily greener on the other side at all times and that with more there always comes a cost.

    From a power use to performance ratio though newer processor technologies are always welcome. For as long as there's money they'll be innovation.
     
  4. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Think Intel Is Old Tech? You’re Wrong

     
  5. ctown.myth

    ctown.myth Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  6. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Intel paying handsomely to attract downstream vendors into launching Ultrabooks

     
  7. sreesub

    sreesub Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    7w cpu having decent integrated gfx plus as good a cpu performance(or better) as SB 17W CPUs would be awesome. Plus since those would be SOC, we will sub 2 lbs ultrabooks or 15hour+ battery with MB Air form factor.

    I like the new direction of CPU architecture.
     
  8. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216

    Intel 2013 Haswell Processor to finally get DirectX 11.1


     
  9. jaguare3

    jaguare3 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    What I don't like about Forbes magazine's predictions is that even Macbook Pros will eliminate discrete cards and go to Intel only.

    Is Intel going to pick up their game or not? The HD 3000 is still, relatively, a crap graphics chip. If we are to go to integrated only then we are going to have to see an IGP that is actually decent.
     
  10. ctown.myth

    ctown.myth Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    According to the link, IVB graphics is a new chip, which Haswell improves upon.

    Obviously it's not a promise, but it holds some hope.
     
  11. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    661
    Messages:
    2,348
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Same direction it's been going for years.
     
  12. Mr. Wonderful

    Mr. Wonderful Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    449
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I thought Ivy Bridge graphics are just a small improvement on Sandy Bridge's?

    The article has the right of it, though. Even two years+ away, Haswell's graphics are already behind.
     
  13. ctown.myth

    ctown.myth Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I did not expect IVB to get major graphics improvements either. Something must've changed, or the wrong vibe has been coming from Intel the past months.
     
  14. CoreEye5

    CoreEye5 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'm annoyed that Intel is withholding native USB 3.0 support for mobile chipsets until mid/late next year.

    I assume it's because of the chipsets that mid-to low-end notebooks have either Bluetooth or USB 3.0 ports, but never both. I could be way off base, but I suspect this happens because the mid-range machines only have two mini-PCI Express slots. One is used for the WiFi NIC. The other is occupied with either a USB 3.0 adapter or a Bluetooth module. So you don't get both. But there are plenty of lousy USB 2.0 ports to go around.
     
  15. jaguare3

    jaguare3 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    As far as I know it's going to be a 30% improvement. Which, in the grand scheme of things, is pretty worthless.

    We need to see at least 200% improvement.


    @CoreEye5 - if that was true, then how does my laptop have both Bluetooth and USB 3.0?
     
  16. Abula

    Abula Puro Chapin

    Reputations:
    1,115
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    106
    I think intel been upfront about this, some believe its because of their lightspeak/thunderbolt, but they did say sandy bridge will not have native usb3 support from the beginig, most of us expect Ivy bridge to come with it, but now there is even rumors that ivy bridge might not support usb3 native.... i guess will see in march.

    Even if they could give that much now, they wouldn't, why would they??? they can milk you down to 30% for years, and we all will continue buying. Its not about what they can do, its what the least they can do to keep their market buying their products at the rate they want.

    All current USB3 is done thru 3rd party, at least on intel, even intel desktop mobos come with Renesas/NEC USB3 controllers, personally i dont mind that much, the controllers seems pretty good in my experience, both desktops n laptops.
     
  17. CoreEye5

    CoreEye5 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    It is true; none of the current Core i-series mobile chipsets have USB 3.0 "baked in."

    You can have USB 3.0 and Bluetooth by means of add-on devices. Nothing stopping the mfg. from doing that other than cost. Which I'm guessing is why you don't often see both Bluetooth and USB 3.0 on current mid- to low-price laptops
     
  18. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Intel Developers Forum 2011: Haswell CPUs promise 20x power saving

    [​IMG]
    via Gizmodo
     
  19. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    AnandTech - First Shot of Haswell, Working Demo at IDF

    [​IMG]

     
  20. chenavd

    chenavd Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    71
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
  21. Deks

    Deks Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    1,272
    Messages:
    5,201
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    331
    That 10 days battery life is for systems on standby... not actual use.
    :D

    Besides, cpu's don't consume much power at all.
    Screens are the biggest power suckers (regardless of the LED tech) actually when it comes to active use.

    And, just because 1 component in the entire system is power efficient, doesn't mean others will be.
    It also depends on manufacturers.
     
  22. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Intel Haswell Info: Single Chip for Ultrabooks, GT3 GPU for Mobile, LGA-1150 for Desktop via VR-Zone

    [​IMG]

     
  23. Tsunade_Hime

    Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow

    Reputations:
    5,413
    Messages:
    10,711
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Interesting how they are literally moving everything to the CPU.
     
  24. talin

    talin Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    4,694
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    It's been a long time coming, but it's still not an SoC. Yet. ;)
     
  25. ickibar123

    ickibar123 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    43
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well, if you have a powerful video card and it doesn't clock down + undervolt when idle, then it may very well consume more power than the screen. But otherwise yeah the screen is #1. My CCFL screen on my laptop takes about 10 watts at full brightness at the wall.
     
  26. ickibar123

    ickibar123 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    43
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    No 6-core mobile chips? That sucks.
     
  27. 3Fees

    3Fees Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    541
    Messages:
    970
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Moving processes to the CPU is nothing new--the original main frame processors were all in one. I would go into more detail--however-I need some liquid refreshment.I'm back--what I want for Christmas is a "Super Computer" in my Lenovo/IBM laptop,,hahahahahahahahahahahahha.


    Cheers
    3Fees :)
     
  28. Mr. Wonderful

    Mr. Wonderful Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    449
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I wonder if there's going to be diminishing returns for CPU cores? I could really see a quad core machine with a decent GPU used for extremely paralleled tasks not showing noticeable signs of aging forever.
     
  29. ickibar123

    ickibar123 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    43
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Oh yeah definitely there are diminishing returns in what the user will see. It's still really good for the applications that can utilize as many cores as it can get it's hands on. Compression programs (7-zip) (Oh wait most of it's algorithms can only go to 2 cores), video encoding, new video games and other simulation/engineering software, Distributed computing, virtual machines.

    But the ordinary solitaire playing computer user would probably see no use for more than 4 cores!
     
  30. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    I'm wondering when the Intel GPU will get 10-bit display support, so we can have switchable graphics with high end displays... Ivy Bridge? Haswell?
     
  31. FastRedPonyCar

    FastRedPonyCar Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Damn seeing this stuff makes me feel like my desktop is an old man.... still fast as hell though.

    i7-920 bloomfield @ 4.0ghz

    surprised that I've had it now for over 2 years and have no desire to upgrade really.
     
  32. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Processor Whispers: About Haskell and Haswell

     
  33. seiyafan

    seiyafan Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    19
    Messages:
    326
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    So can we Forget Intel Haswell, Broadwell on the way?
     
  34. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
  35. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Intel's first Haswell chip pictured | bit-tech.net (Desktop)

    [​IMG]
     
  36. Dufus

    Dufus .

    Reputations:
    1,194
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    548
    Trophy Points:
    131
  37. Kallogan

    Kallogan Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    56
    If this tock is as significant as Sandy bridge one, this will be a hell of a tock.
     
  38. trvelbug

    trvelbug Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    929
    Messages:
    4,007
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    116
    I don't think I've ever used avx in my quads. In what situations would these new set of instructions be of help?

    Sent from my samsung galaxy s2 using tapatalk

    Sent from my samsung galaxy s2 using tapatalk
     
  39. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    There are very few applications that currently support AVX, but AMD also supports it so maybe in the future more apps will be built to include it.
     
  40. Dufus

    Dufus .

    Reputations:
    1,194
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    548
    Trophy Points:
    131
    IIRC when SSE was first introduced it took something like 5 years before being widely used by software.

    You might find the the first adopters will be number crunching softwares but even then with software such as prime95 AVX is still very much work in progress, not finalized yet, even though AVX instructions have been available for over a year now.

    I guess most software houses are going to write software that will run on the majority of processors/systems and there are still a lot of older processors out there that do not support AVX. Even Windows didn't support AVX until SP1 for W7 so versions before that can not natively run AVX properly.
     
  41. trvelbug

    trvelbug Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    929
    Messages:
    4,007
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    116
    I do video editing so I'm quite interested in the new avx and fpo instruction set.
    But although I see sse support I've can't remember seeing avx support on any program. It would be interesting though cause these could have major effects on video editing and transcoding especially with quick sync integration

    Sent from my samsung galaxy s2 using tapatalk
     
  42. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
  43. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Intel Haswell iGPU: there's something for everyone by VR-Zone.com

     
  44. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    2013 mobile Shark Bay platform promises NFC

    Shark Bay 2013 has one and two chip platforms coming (see post #72)

     
  45. Mr. Wonderful

    Mr. Wonderful Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    449
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    31
  46. yknyong1

    yknyong1 Radiance with Radeon

    Reputations:
    1,191
    Messages:
    2,095
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    56
  47. long2905

    long2905 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    2,443
    Messages:
    2,314
    Likes Received:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    81
    nice info! I wonder if that would affect tray CPU or only on laptops.
     
  48. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Intel 22nm Haswell Processors Will Launch in March 2013, Says Report - Softpedia

     
  49. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,877
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Why would the memory controller care if it's DDR3L or DDR3?
     
  50. H.A.L. 9000

    H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw

    Reputations:
    6,415
    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    552
    Trophy Points:
    281
    According to what I've read, DDR3L has different physical characteristics like different ball/signal assignments. Or according to JEDEC anyway...
     
← Previous pageNext page →