They're basically the same price, which one is the best in term of:
- speed
- reliability
- power consumption?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Yan
-
John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator
I've got a couple of the MHZ2320BHs. Here's the performance results. One replaced a WD 2500BEVS and the Fujitsu is slightly cooler. I've had no worries about reliability.
AFAIK there is no 2.5" 7K500, only a desktop HDD. Which of the Hitachi 2.5" HDDs do you mean? The 5K500? If it is that one, then be aware that it is thicker than normal notebook HDDs.
John -
Sorry, I meant Hitachi 5K320.
Very good new about the Fuji, thank you for the results! -
Here is an HD Tune result of the 5K320 in comparison to the Fujitsu.
You can also check out the Seagate 5400.5 and the WD3200BEVT.
Seagate, Hitachi and the Fujitsu are pretty quiet and cool, whereas the WD3200BEVT leads in benchmarks and real-world performance. (on par with most 7200RPMs) -
John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator
Also see this guide which has some more info and links.
One reason I got the Fujitsu HDDs is that the UK pricing is very reasonable.
John -
If the same cost? Hitachi even John the contrarian might agree?
-
Looking at the performance results, the WD3200BEVT is pretty nice and may worth the price upgrade! Good transfer rate and access time.
-
If you're looking at performance, then the WD is for you, but is said to have a higher power consumption than the rest of the 320gigs.
-
John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator
John
Fujitsu MHZ2320BH vs Hitachi 5K320?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Xcessiv, Aug 19, 2008.