The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    GTS250M upgrade results.

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Meaker@Sager, Jul 4, 2010.

  1. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,441
    Messages:
    58,202
    Likes Received:
    17,916
    Trophy Points:
    931
    3dmark06:
    ORB - Compare

    3dmark vantage:
    ORB - Compare

    Crysis:

    Results DX10 no AA:

    1080p VeryHigh = 10.12
    1080p Medium = 15.92

    DX9 no AA:

    1280x720 Medium = 45.94

    --------------------------------------------------------

    GT240M results for comparison:

    3dmark vantage:
    ORB - Compare

    3dmark06:
    ORB - Compare

    Crysis results (625/1450/950):

    1080p (very high) DX10= 6.92FPS
    1280x1024 (Medium) DX10 = 26.31FPS
    1280x768 (Medium) DX9 = 37.4FPS
     
  2. mitsuhide

    mitsuhide Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    109
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    what is you MXM interface ?

    2.0b or 3.0b ?

    Mobility HD 5850 may useable
     
  3. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,441
    Messages:
    58,202
    Likes Received:
    17,916
    Trophy Points:
    931
    MXM type A.

    Type B cards will not fit.

    CLocks were 550/1190/968

    Core 3d voltage is just 0.9v

    Crysis results (stock game)

    Results DX10 no AA:

    1080p VeryHigh = 10.12
    1080p Medium = 15.92
    1280x720 Medium = 42.59

    DX9 no AA:

    1280x720 Medium = 45.94